| Literature DB >> 34960453 |
Jianping Zhao1,2, Yong Cheng1, Gen Cai1, Shengbo He1, Libing Liao1, Guoqiang Wu1, Li Yang1, Chang Feng1,2.
Abstract
This paper proposes a calibration method for a self-rotating, linear-structured-light (LSL) scanning, three-dimensional reconstruction system based on plane constraints. The point cloud of plane target collected by the self-rotating, LSL scanning, 3D reconstruction system should be constrained to the basic principle of the plane equation; it can quickly and accurately calibrate the position parameters between the coordinate system of the LSL module and the coordinate system of the self-rotating, LSL scanning, 3D reconstruction system. Additionally, the transformation equation could be established with the calibrated optimal position parameters. This paper obtains the above-mentioned position parameters through experiments and uses the calibrated self-rotating, LSL scanning, 3D reconstruction system to perform three-dimensional scanning and reconstruction of the test piece. The experimental results show that the calibration method can effectively improve the measurement accuracy of the system.Entities:
Keywords: calibration; linear-structured light; rotation center; three-dimensional reconstruction
Year: 2021 PMID: 34960453 PMCID: PMC8708291 DOI: 10.3390/s21248359
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1The self-rotating, linear-structured light scanning measurement system.
Figure 2The transformation between the coordinate system of the LSL module and the coordinate system of the self-rotating, LSL scanning, 3D reconstruction system.
Figure 3The calibration of self-rotating, LSL scanning, 3D reconstruction system based on plane constraints.
Figure 4Schematic of different plane positions.
Figure 5Calibration experiment of self-rotating, LSL scanning, 3D reconstruction system based on plane constraints.
Figure 6The relationship between the root-mean-squared error S value and the parameters M and N.
Calibration results of parameters M and N.
| Mopt | Nopt | Min(S) |
|---|---|---|
| 123 mm | 409 mm | 5.88 × 10−4 mm |
Figure 7Test piece.
Figure 8The measurement experiment of test piece.
Figure 9Point cloud data in the coordinate system of the self-rotating, LSL scanning, 3D reconstruction when M = 123 and N = 409.
Comparison of measurement results.
| Measurement Target | Values Measuredby CMM | Values and Errors Measured by LSL When M = 123, N = 409 (10 Times) | Values and Errors Measured by LSL When M = 110, N = 395 (10 Times) | Values and Errors Measured by LSL When M = 130 and N = 425 (10 Times) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left round groove | Diameter | 50.01 mm | 49.97 mm | −0.08% | 47.24 mm | −5.54% | 51.58 mm | +3.14% |
| Depth | 30.03 mm | 29.96 mm | −0.23% | 29.94 mm | −0.30% | 29.86 mm | −0.57% | |
| Right round groove | Diameter | 50.02 mm | 49.96 mm | −0.12% | 47.30 mm | −5.32% | 51.53 mm | +0.30% |
| Depth | 30.02 mm | 29.96 mm | −0.20% | 29.91 mm | −0.37% | 29.85 mm | −0.57% | |
| Rectangu-lar groove | Length | 39.99 mm | 40.01 mm | −0.05% | 38.01 mm | −4.95% | 41.17 mm | +2.95% |
| Width | 80.03 mm | 80.01 mm | −0.02% | 79.99 mm | −0.05% | 80.01 mm | −0.02% | |
| Depth | 20.01 mm | 19.99 mm | −0.10% | 19.86 mm | −0.75% | 19.85 mm | 0.80% | |