| Literature DB >> 34960316 |
Olga Escuredo1, Laura Meno1, María Shantal Rodríguez-Flores1, Maria Carmen Seijo1.
Abstract
The aim of the present work was to determine the main quality parameters on tuber potato using a portable near-infrared spectroscopy device (MicroNIR). Potato tubers protected by the Protected Geographical Indication (PGI "Patata de Galicia", Spain) were analyzed both using chemical methods of reference and also using the NIR methodology for the determination of important parameters for tuber commercialization, such as dry matter and reducing sugars. MicroNIR technology allows for the attainment/estimation of dry matter and reducing sugars in the warehouses by directly measuring the tubers without a chemical treatment and destruction of samples. The principal component analysis and modified partial least squares regression method were used to develop the NIR calibration model. The best determination coefficients obtained for dry matter and reducing sugars were of 0.72 and 0.55, respectively, and with acceptable standard errors of cross-validation. Near-infrared spectroscopy was established as an effective tool to obtain prediction equations of these potato quality parameters. At the same time, the efficiency of portable devices for taking instantaneous measurements of crucial quality parameters is useful for potato processors.Entities:
Keywords: MPLS; NIR spectrometer; chemometrics; dry matter; intact potato; reducing sugars
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34960316 PMCID: PMC8707853 DOI: 10.3390/s21248222
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1NIR spectra measured by the MicroNIR spectrometer.
An overview of the samples by potato cultivar and distribution by the calibration and validation set.
| Mean | SD | Min | Max | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samples set by potato cultivar | |||||
| Kennebec (N = 48) | Dry matter (%) | 19.88 | 1.63 | 16.00 | 22.10 |
| Reducing sugar (g/100 g) | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.49 | |
| Agria (N = 41) | Dry matter (%) | 20.19 | 1.04 | 17.30 | 22.20 |
| Reducing sugar (g/100 g) | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.37 | |
| Calibration set (N = 70) | |||||
| Dry matter (%) | 19.67 | 2.07 | 16.0 | 22.0 | |
| Reducing sugar (g/100 g) | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.49 | |
| Validation set (N = 19) | |||||
| Dry matter (%) | 19.89 | 1.25 | 17.80 | 22.0 | |
| Reducing sugar (g/100 g) | 0.20 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.43 | |
| Total sample set (N = 89) | |||||
| Dry matter (%) | 20.03 | 1.39 | 16.00 | 22.20 | |
| Reducing sugar (g/100 g) | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.49 | |
SD: Relative standard deviation; Max: Maximum; Min: Minimum.
Figure 2Box and whisker plot for dry matter (p-value = 0.68) and reducing sugars (p-value < 0.0001) by potato cultivar. The p-value according to the Kruskal-Wallis test by potato cultivar.
Calibration descriptors of the best models obtained for each parameter by NIR.
| Constituent | Math Treatment * | N | Mean | SD | Range of | SEC | RSQ | SECV | RPD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Max | |||||||||
| Dry matter | Detrend only 0,0,1,1 | 65 | 20.09 | 1.36 | 16.00 | 24.18 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.93 | 1.90 |
| Standard MSC 2,10,10,1 | 65 | 20.04 | 1.42 | 15.77 | 24.31 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 10.21 | 1.89 | |
| None 2,4,4,1 | 65 | 20.17 | 1.25 | 16.41 | 23.94 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.98 | 1.85 | |
| Standard MSC 2,4,4,1 | 63 | 20.15 | 1.28 | 16.30 | 24.00 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.96 | 1.84 | |
| SNV only 2,4,4,1 | 66 | 20.07 | 1.43 | 15.76 | 24.37 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 10.31 | 1.82 | |
| Reducing sugars | SNV only 0,0,1,1 | 62 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 0.55 | 0.05 | 1.48 |
| Detrend only 2,8,6,1 | 61 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.02 | 0.51 | 0.03 | 1.42 | |
| Standard MSC 0,0,1,1 | 63 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.29 | 0.03 | 0.50 | 0.03 | 1.41 | |
| Detrend only 0,0,1,1 | 61 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.03 | 0.48 | 0.03 | 1.39 | |
| None 2,4,4,1 | 60 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 0.48 | 0.03 | 1.39 | |
N: Number of samples after removing the outliers; MSC: Multiplicative dispersion correction; SNV: Standard normal variate; SD: Standard deviation; Min: Minimum; Max: Maximum; RSQ: Multiple correlation coefficients; SEC: Standard error of calibration; SECV: Standard error of cross-validation; RPD: Ratio performance deviation. * In the math treatment, the first digit is the number of the derivative, the second is the gap over which the derivative is calculated, the third is the number of data points in a running average or smoothing, and the fourth is the second smoothing.
Figure 3Internal validation. Comparison of reference values with predicted values by the NIRS model for each quality parameter. RSQ: Multiple correlation coefficient; SEP: Standard error of prediction; SEP (C): Standard error of prediction corrected by BIAS.
External validation (19 samples) of potato quality parameters with the results of the NIR calibration.
| Constituent | Mean Residual | RMSE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry matter | 1.01 | 1.17 | 0.22 |
| Reducing sugars | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.16 |
RMSE: Root mean standard error. p-value: Level of significance calculated according to the Student’s test.