| Literature DB >> 34960312 |
Namhoon Ha1, Han-Seung Lee2, Songjun Lee1.
Abstract
Structural health monitoring (SHM) can be more efficient with the application of a wireless sensor network (WSN). However, the hardware that makes up this system should have sufficient performance to sample the data collected from the sensor in real-time situations. High-performance hardware can be used for this purpose, but is not suitable in this application because of its relatively high power consumption, high cost, large size, and so on. In this paper, an optimal remote monitoring system platform for SHM is proposed based on pulsed eddy current (PEC) that is utilized for measuring the corrosion of a steel-framed construction. A circuit to delay the PEC response based on the resistance-inductance-capacitance (RLC) combination was designed for data sampling to utilize the conventional hardware of WSN for SHM, and this approach was verified by simulations and experiments. Especially, the importance of configuring sensing modules and the WSN for remote monitoring were studied, and the PEC responses caused by the corrosion of a specimen made with steel were able to be sampled remotely using the proposed system. Therefore, we present a remote SHM system platform for diagnosing the corrosion condition of a building with a steel structure, and proving its viability with experiments.Entities:
Keywords: corrosion; pulsed eddy current; steel-framed construction; structural health monitoring; wireless sensor network
Year: 2021 PMID: 34960312 PMCID: PMC8704296 DOI: 10.3390/s21248199
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1A typical PEC response.
Figure 2The delay circuit of a sensor module for sampling PEC response.
Figure 3A simulation of the delay circuit for monitoring the PEC response.
Figure 4Hardware configuration of the sensor node.
Figure 5The proposed architecture of the monitoring system.
Figure 6The experimental setup.
Figure 7The delayed PEC response measured by the sensor circuit.
Figure 8The variation of the PEC response by corrosion level.
Figure 9Resistance and inductance of the sensor coil by corrosion level.
Figure 10Detectable range of the proposed sensor.
Figure 11The dashboard for monitoring corrosion.