| Literature DB >> 34960259 |
Tunan Chen1,2, Kang Li1, Fengxiang Ma3, Xinjie Qiu3, Zongjia Qiu1, Zhenghai Liao1,2, Guoqiang Zhang1,2.
Abstract
Accurate quantitative detection for trace gas has long been the center of failure diagnosis for gas-insulated equipment. An absorption spectroscopy-based detection system was developed for trace SF6 decomposition SO2 detection in this paper. In order to reduce interference from other decomposition, ultraviolet spectrum of SO2 was selected for detection. Firstly, an excimer lamp was developed in this paper as the excitation of the absorption spectroscopy compared with regular light sources with electrodes, such as electrodeless lamps that are more suitable for long-term monitoring. Then, based on the developed excimer lamp, a detection system for trace SO2 was established. Next, a proper absorption peak was selected by calculating spectral derivative for further analysis. Experimental results indicated that good linearity existed between the absorbance and concentration of SO2 at the chosen absorption peak. Moreover, the detection limit of the proposed detection system could reach the level of 10-7. The results of this paper could serve as a guide for the application of excimer lamp in online monitoring for SF6-insulated equipment.Entities:
Keywords: SF6-insulated equipment; absorption spectroscopy; excimer lamp; online monitoring
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34960259 PMCID: PMC8705914 DOI: 10.3390/s21248165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Absorption cross section of SO2 in UV range.
Common formula and nominal wavelength of excimer lamp.
| Formula | Nominal Wavelength |
|---|---|
| F-Kr | 220 nm, 248 nm, 272 nm, 275 nm |
| Cl-Kr | 200 nm, 222 nm, 240 nm, 235 nm |
| Br-Kr | 207 nm, 222 nm, 228 nm |
| I-Kr | 190 nm, 195 nm, 206 nm, 225 nm |
Figure 2Emission intensity of excimer lamps.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of the detection system.
Figure 4Absorption spectra of transmission at different concentration of SO2.
Figure 5Smoothed spectra at different concentration of SO2.
Figure 6Derivative spectra of absorbance at different concentration of SO2.
Figure 7Linear fitting between absorbance and concentration.
Accuracy of detection system.
| Gas Sample | Detection Result (μL/L) | Gas Concentration (μL/L) | Relative Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.9 (±23.189%) | 3.3 (±2.255%) | 18.1 |
| 2 | 6.2 (±20.239%) | 6.4 (±2.255%) | 3.1 |
| 3 | 15.5 (±7.026%) | 15.8 (±2.255%) | 1.9 |
| 4 | 84.6 (±2.023%) | 83.5 (±2.255%) | 1.3 |
| 5 | 126.3 (±1.857%) | 116.9 (±2.255%) | 8.0 |
| 6 | 139.5 (±3.393%) | 135.6 (±2.255%) | 2.9 |
Systematic noise and detection limit of the detection system.
| Signal of Gas Sample | Systematic Noise | Signal to Noise Ratio | Detection Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.310 | 3.47 × 10−3 | 90.038 | 0.632 μL/L |
Figure 8Output of the excimer lamp.
Figure 9Fluctuation over time of the spectrometer.
Comparison of the performances of common optical detection methods.
| Methods | Detection Limit | Response Speed |
|---|---|---|
| UV-DOAS | Sub-ppm | Fast |
| UV fluorescence | Sub-ppm | Fast |
| FTIR | ppm | Medium |
| PAS | Sub-ppm | Fast |
| Proposed detection system | Sub-ppm | Fast |