| Literature DB >> 34959917 |
Anna Jakubczyk1, Urszula Złotek1, Kamila Rybczyńska-Tkaczyk2.
Abstract
This research aims to investigate the influence of elicitation and drying methods (natural, convection, microwave, and freeze-drying), with jasmonic acid (JA) and yeast extract (YE) on the biological activity of extracts and hydrolysates from lovage (Levisticum officinale Koch) leaves. The results indicate that the highest TPC was determined for hydrolysates obtained from JA-elicited microwave-dried lovage (24.96 mg/gDW). The highest ACE and lipase inhibitory activity was noted for PBS extract obtained from JA-elicited lovage after microwave drying (EC50 = 0.16 and 0.12 mg/mL, respectively). Ethanolic extract from JA-elicited lovage after freeze-drying was characterized by the highest α-amylase inhibitory activity (EC50 = 3.92 mg/mL) and the highest α-glucosidase inhibitory activity (EC50 = 1.43 mg/mL) was noted for hydrolysates from control plants subjected to freeze-drying. The highest antimicrobial activity towards C. albicans yeasts was observed for microwave ethanolic extracts with minimal inhibition (MIC) and lethal (MLC) concentrations of 0.625 and 1.25 mg/mL, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: anti-metabolic syndrome; antimicrobial properties; drying method; elicitors; lovage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34959917 PMCID: PMC8708861 DOI: 10.3390/nu13124365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Total phenolic content (TPC) in the samples.
| Elicitor | C | JA | YE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drying Method | ||||
| Ehanolic extract (mg/gDW) | ||||
| natural | 11.47 ± 2.16 aA | 12.69 ± 1.53 aA | 18.09 ± 0.97 bB | |
| convection | 16.35 ± 1.30 abB | 17.92 ± 1.72 bB | 14.12 ± 1.83 aA | |
| microwave | 14.56 ± 1.41 abAB | 17.58 ± 2.25 bB | 13.22 ± 0.82 aA | |
| freeze-drying | 14.20 ± 0.75 aAB | 18.48 ± 1.66 bB | 15.76 ± 1.13 aAB | |
| PBS extract (mg/gDW) | ||||
| natural | 11.93 ± 1.29 aAB | 11.87 ± 0.25 aB | 9.99 ± 0.25 aA | |
| convection | 9.46 ± 3.02 aA | 14.52 ± 1.00 bAB | 12.31 ± 1.68 abA | |
| microwave | 11.70 ± 0.44 aAB | 12.48 ± 0.44 aA | 12.49 ± 1.53 aA | |
| freeze-drying | 14.18 ± 1.21 bB | 13.77 ± 0.30 bAB | 10.59 ± 0.6 aA | |
| Hydrolysates (mg/gDW) | ||||
| natural | 19.98 ± 1.5 bA | 21.35 ± 0.89 bA | 15.90 ± 2.12 aA | |
| convection | 22.34 ± 0.89 aA | 22.62 ± 0.78 aAB | 21.91 ± 2.65 aB | |
| microwave | 21.50 ± 1.74 bA | 24.96 ± 0.83 cC | 18.44 ± 0.49 aAB | |
| freeze-drying | 22.25 ± 0.58 bA | 23.76 ± 1.67 bBC | 18.77 ± 1.50 aAB | |
C—control samples without elicitation; JA—samples elicited with 10 µM jasmonic acid; YE—samples elicited with 0.1% yeast extract. All values are the mean ± standard deviation for triplicate experiments. Different capital letters in the same columns indicate significant differences for the same drying method in the same type of sample (ethanolic extract, PBS extract, or hydrolysates) (α = 0.05). Different lowercase letters in the same row indicate significant differences for the same drying method (α = 0.05). The data were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure.
ACE and lipase inhibitory activity of samples.
| Sample | C | JA | YE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibitor of Enzyme | ACE | Lipase | ACE | Lipase | ACE | Lipase | |
| Drying Method | |||||||
| Ehanolic Extract (EC50 mg/mL) | |||||||
| natural | 0.43 ± 0.06 aA | nd | 0.18 ± 0.02 aA | nd | 0.61 ± 0.06 bA | nd | |
| convection | 1.32 ± 0.05 aB | nd | 0.96 ± 0.01 aB | nd | nd | 0.15 ± 0.008 A | |
| microwave | 0.37 ± 0.01 abA | 0.17 ± 0.01 a | 0.49 ± 0.03 bAC | 0.51 ± 0.06 bA | 0.25 ± 0.03 aB | nd | |
| freeze-drying | 0.41 ± 0.04 aA | nd | 0.61 ± 0.03 bC | 0.25 ± 0.03 aB | 0.38 ± 0.02 aC | 0.24 ± 0.04 aB | |
| PBS Extract (EC50 mg/mL) | |||||||
| natural | nd | 0.22 ± 0.03 aAB | nd | 0.44 ± 0.06 bB | nd | 0.17 ± 0.01 aA | |
| convection | nd | 0.14 ± 0.008 aA | nd | 0.20 ± 0.01 aA | nd | 0.44 ± 0.05 bB | |
| microwave | 0.25 ± 0.01 b | 0.18 ± 0.01 aB | 0.16 ± 0.03 a | 0.12 ± 0.02 bA | 0.30 ± 0.01 b | 0.23 ± 0.02 aAB | |
| freeze-drying | nd | 0.26 ± 0.05 aAB | nd | 0.19 ± 0.01 aA | nd | 0.22 ± 0.01 aAB | |
| Hydrolysates (EC50 mg/mL) | |||||||
| natural | nd | 0.17 ± 0.005 aA | nd | 0.47 ± 0.07 bA | nd | 0.47 ± 0.02 bB | |
| convection | nd | 0.69 ± 0.04 aB | 1.14 ± 0.03 A | 0.67 ± 0.01 aA | nd | 0.26 ± 0.006 bA | |
| microwave | 3.87 ± 0.85 a | 0.69 ± 0.04 bB | 0.74 ± 0.02b B | 0.75 ± 0.01 bA | 0.51 ± 0.04 bA | 0.44 ± 0.05 aB | |
| freeze-drying | nd | 0.83 ± 0.09 cB | 1.32 ± 0.12 aA | 0.57 ± 0.06 bA | 0.63 ± 0.03 bA | 0.30 ± 0.03 aA | |
C—control samples without elicitation; JA—samples elicited with 10 µM jasmonic acid; YE—samples elicited with 0.1% yeast extract, Nd—not detected. All values are the mean ± standard deviation for triplicate experiments. Different capital letters in the same columns indicate significant differences for the same drying method in the same type of sample (α = 0.05). Different lowercase letters in the same row indicate significant differences for the same indicator (α = 0.05). The data were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure.
α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of sample.
| Sample | C | JA | YE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibition of Enzyme | α-Amylase | α-Glucosidase | α-Amylase | α-Glucosidase | α-Amylase | α-Glucosidase | |
| Drying Methods | |||||||
| Ehanolic extract (EC50 mg/mL) | |||||||
| natural | 4.73 ± 0.20 aA | 2.92 ± 0.03 bA | 4.79 ± 0.65 aA | 2.83 ± 0.03 aA | 5.90 ± 0.97 aA | 2.83 ± 0.05 aA | |
| convection | 14.00 ± 0.73 bB | 2.88 ± 0.08 aA | 4.01 ± 0.20 aA | 2.78 ± 0.05 aA | 3.92 ± 0.20 aA | 2.82 ± 0.03 aA | |
| microwave | 4.34 ± 0.81 aA | 3.31 ± 0.17 bB | 3.92 ± 0.81 aA | 2.84 ± 0.07 aA | 4.03 ± 0.66 aA | 2.78 ± 0.02 aA | |
| freeze-drying | 22.82 ± 2.32 cC | 2.78 ± 0.01 aA | 3.63 ± 0.81 aA | 2.85 ± 0.05 aA | 11.88 ± 2.47 bB | 2.85 ± 0.08 aA | |
| PBS extract (EC50 mg/mL) | |||||||
| natural | 56.43 ± 4.55 cB | nd | 26.16 ± 1.19 bB | 59.05 ± 9.17 bB | 14.89 ± 0.87 aA | nd | |
| convection | 23.84 ± 2.72 aA | nd | 67.54 ± 1.73 bC | 13.59 ± 0.88 aA | 24.77 ± 1.01 aB | 25.42 ± 3.39 bA | |
| microwave | 101.88 ± 7.75 bC | nd | 14.33 ± 0.42 aA | 73.14 ± 3.55 bC | 17.79 ± 2.3 aA | nd | |
| freeze-drying | 18.13 ± 2.01 bA | 32.96 ± 3.33 b | 11.32 ± 2.32 aA | 17.36 ± 0.94 aA | 16.68 ± 0.12 abA | 26.38 ± 3.68 bA | |
| Hydrolysates (EC50 mg/mL) | |||||||
| natural | 17.25 ± 3.22 bB | 1.98 ± 0.12 aB | 11.80 ± 0.25 aA | 1.77 ± 0.24 aA | 10.89 ± 0.59 aA | 1.94 ± 0.08 aB | |
| convection | 10.17 ± 0.83 aA | 1.45 ± 0.01 aA | 11.35 ± 0.22 aA | 1.49 ± 0.04 aA | 21.15 ± 2.97 bB | 1.57 ± 0.04 aA | |
| microwave | 22.95 ± 1.31 bC | 1.89 ± 0.01 bB | 21.96 ± 1.65 bB | 1.54 ± 0.07 aA | 12.50 ± 2.12 aA | 1.45 ± 0.04 aA | |
| freeze-drying | 11.07 ± 1.12 aA | 1.43 ± 0.02 aA | 10.82 ± 1.57 aA | 1.45 ± 0.06 aA | 16.46 ± 1.13 bB | 1.55 ± 0.02 bA | |
C—control samples without elicitation; JA—samples elicited with 10 µM jasmonic acid; YE—samples elicited with 0.1% yeast extract; Nd—not detected. All values are the mean ± standard deviation for triplicate experiments. Different capital letters in the same columns indicate significant differences for the same drying method in the same type of sample (α = 0.05). Different lowercase letters in the same row indicate significant differences for the same indicator (α = 0.05). The data were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure.
Antimicrobial activity of dry samples (nd –not detected).
| Microorganism | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | |||||||
| Dry Method | Elicitors | MIC/MLC (mg mL−1) | |||||
| Ethanolic extracts | |||||||
| natural | control | 2.5/5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 1.25/2.5 |
| JA | 2.5/5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 1.25/2.5 | |
| YE | 2.5/5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 1.25/2.5 | |
| convection | control | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 |
| JA | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 1.25/2.5 | |
| YE | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | |
| microwave | control | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 0.62/1.25 |
| JA | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 0.62/1.25 | |
| YE | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 0.62/1.25 | |
| freeze-drying | control | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 1.25/2.5 |
| JA | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 1.25/2.5 | |
| YE | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 2.5/5.0 | 1.252.5 | |
| PBS extracts | |||||||
| natural | control | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| JA | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | |
| YE | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | |
| convection | control | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| JA | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | |
| YE | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | |
| microwave | control | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| JA | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | |
| YE | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | |
| freeze-drying | control | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| JA | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | |
| YE | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | |
| Hydrolysates | |||||||
| natural | control | 2.5/5.0 | nd | nd | 2.5/5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 |
| JA | 2.5/5.0 | nd | nd | 5.0/>5.0 | nd | 5.0/>5.0 | |
| YE | 2.55.0 | nd | nd | 5.0/>5.0 | nd | 5.0/>5.0 | |
| convection | control | 1.25/2.5 | nd | nd | 2.5/5.0 | 5.0 | 1.25/2.5 |
| JA | 5.0/>5.0 | nd | nd | 5.0/>5.0 | nd | 5.0/>5.0 | |
| YE | 1.25/2.5 | nd | nd | 2.5/5.0 | nd | 1.25/2.5 | |
| microwave | control | 5.0/>5.0 | nd | nd | 1.25/2.5 | 5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 |
| JA | 5.0/>5.0 | nd | nd | 2.5/5.0 | nd | 1.25/2.5 | |
| YE | 5.0/>5.0 | nd | nd | 2.5/5.0 | nd | 1.25/2.5 | |
| freeze-drying | control | 1.25/2.5 | nd | nd | 2.5/5.0 | nd | 5.0/>5.0 |
| JA | 5.0/>5.0 | nd | nd | 5.0/>5.0 | nd | 5.0/>5.0 | |
| YE | 1.25/2.5 | nd | nd | 1.25/2.5 | 5.0 | 5.0/>5.0 | |
Figure 1Viability (in %) of yeast C. albicans ATCC 90028 against natural (A), convention (B), microwave (C), and freeze-drying samples (D).