| Literature DB >> 34959839 |
Hongying Fan1, Youteng Gan1, Ruohang Wang1, Siming Chen1, Małgorzata Lipowska2, Jianye Li3, Keqiang Li3, Daniel Krokosz3, Yin Yang1, Mariusz Lipowski3.
Abstract
A strong sociocultural context could affect an individual's aesthetic standards. In order to achieve a socially recognized ideal appearance, obligatory exercisers might increase dieting behavior when exercise actions are disturbed, thereby placing the individual at risk of eating disorders. The current study mainly examined the relationship between obligatory exercise and eating attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic, and considered the mediating role of externalized sociocultural attitudes towards appearance between the two. A total of 342 participants (175 females, 167 males) from various regions of China were invited to fill out the questionnaires including the Obligatory Exercise Questionnaire, the Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire-3, and the Eating Attitudes Test. In total, 51.5% of the participants presented symptoms of an obligatory exercise behavior. Among them, males, young adults, and the participants with lower BMI had higher OEQ scores, whereas females and young adults had higher EAT-26 scores. Meanwhile, 9.4% of the participants might have had an eating disorder. The OEQ score was positively correlated with the EAT-26 total score as well as SATAQ-3 'Pressures' and 'Information' subscales. In addition, the EAT-26 total score was positively correlated with the SATAQ-3 'Pressures' and 'Information' subscales. Externalized sociocultural attitudes towards appearance served as a mediator between obligatory exercise behavior and eating attitudes, and the mediation effect accounted for 56.82% of the total effect. Obligatory exercise behavior may have an indirect effect on eating attitudes through sociocultural attitudes towards appearance. Given the sociocultural information and pressures, in order to maintain or pursue an ideal appearance, many people tend to keep a pathological diet. Thus, forming a positive and healthy social aesthetic orientation is beneficial in helping obligatory exercisers to develop reasonable eating habits.Entities:
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; body esteem; eating habits; obligatory run
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34959839 PMCID: PMC8709158 DOI: 10.3390/nu13124286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Descriptive statistics and differential analysis of participants’ scores on the OEQ, EAT-26, and SATAQ scales.
| Variables | Category ( | OEQ | EAT-26 | SATAQ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dieting | Bulimia | Oral Control | Total Score | Pressures | Information | |||
| Gender | Female (175) | 45.80 ± 10.159 | 6.83 ± 5.371 | 1.06 ± 1.708 | 2.30 ± 2.525 | 10.19 ± 6.775 | 20.50 ± 6.961 | 26.98 ± 5.406 |
| Male (167) | 51.21 ± 9.705 | 5.50 ± 5.212 | 1.04 ± 1.468 | 1.75 ± 2.133 | 8.26 ± 6.548 | 18.25 ± 6.840 | 24.81 ± 5.383 | |
| t value | −5.031 *** | 2.335 ** | 0.123 | 2.165 * | 2.678 ** | 3.015 ** | 3.706 *** | |
| Age | ≤24 years (160) | 51.09 ± 9.698 a | 5.64 ± 5.514 a | 1.18 ± 1.644 | 2.31 ± 2.403 a | 9.11 ± 6.744 ad | 19.34 ± 6.698 a | 25.15 ± 5.345 a |
| 25~34 years (88) | 50.00 ± 9.261 a | 8.55 ± 5.498 b | 1.23 ± 1.687 | 2.45 ± 2.382 a | 12.23 ± 6.959 b | 21.42 ± 6546 b | 28.55 ± 5.228 b | |
| 35~44 years (37) | 40.65 ± 9.956 b | 4.19 ± 3.511 a | 0.73 ± 1.592 | 0.92 ± 1.422 b | 5.84 ± 4.947 c | 16.97 ± 7.392 a | 24.35 ± 5.427 a | |
| 45~54 years (34) | 44.12 ± 8.693 b | 5.26 ± 4.882 a | 0.50 ± 1.052 | 1.79 ± 2.750 ab | 7.56 ± 6.325 cd | 18.18 ± 8.204 a | 25.28 ± 5.484 a | |
| ≥55 years (23) | 43.00 ± 11.107 b | 5.43 ± 3.449 a | 0.74 ± 1.322 | 0.70 ± 1.329 b | 6.87 ± 3.900 cd | 17.83 ± 6.386 a | 24.74 ± 4.683 a | |
| F value | 13.228 *** | 6.832 *** | 2.180 | 5.540 *** | 8.688 *** | 3.622 ** | 7.477 *** | |
| Residence | Rural or township (61) | 48.75 ± 11.067 ab | 5.20 ± 5.102 | 1.33 ± 1.895 | 1.95 ± 2.617 | 8.48 ± 7.108 | 20.82 ± 7.284 a | 26.41 ± 5.719 |
| Medium-sized city (69) | 51.65 ± 10.054 a | 6.30 ± 5.877 | 1.14 ± 1.683 | 2.19 ± 2.088 | 9.64 ± 6.575 | 20.64 ± 6.642 a | 26.17 ± 6.007 | |
| Large city (212) | 47.31 ± 9.947 b | 6.42 ± 5.197 | 0.93 ± 1.459 | 2.01 ± 2.365 | 9.35 ± 6.675 | 18.59 ± 6.913 b | 25.70 ± 5.265 | |
| F value | 4.782 ** | 1.283 | 1.618 | 0.197 | 0.541 | 3.816 * | 0.487 | |
| Body Mass Index BMI * | ≤18.4 Thin (36) | 50.39 ± 13.096 a | 4.36 ± 5.452 | 1.06 ± 1.511 | 3.78 ± 3.415 a | 9.19 ± 6.899 | 21.29 ± 7.436 a | 26.28 ± 5.348 ab |
| 18.5~23.9 Average (206) | 50.21 ± 9.729 a | 6.66 ± 5.589 | 1.12 ± 1.559 | 2.12 ± 2.200 b | 9.88 ± 6.805 | 20.49 ± 6.625 a | 26.59 ± 5.589 a | |
| 24.0~27.9 | 44.42 ± 8.740 b | 5.70 ± 4.769 | 0.88 ± 1.605 | 1.23 ± 1.783 c | 7.81 ± 6.603 | 16.33 ± 6.917 b | 24.38 ± 5.056 b | |
| ≥28 Obesity (29) | 42.48 ± 9.206 b | 6.34 ± 4.228 | 0.93 ± 1.963 | 1.03 ± 1.500 c | 8.31 ± 5.971 | 16.45 ± 6.384 b | 24.21 ± 4.924 b | |
| F value | 9.933 *** | 2.155 | 0.437 | 12.295 *** | 1.851 | 9.288 *** | 3.958 ** | |
Note: Independent-samples t-tests were used for analyses by gender, and one-way analysis of variance tests (ANOVA) was used for analyses by age, residence, or BMI. abcd the same letter means that there is no difference between pairwise comparisons within the group, and different letters mean that there is a difference. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Pearson correlation between OEQ, EAT-26, and SATAQ scores.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEQ | 1 | ||||||
| EAT-26 Dieting | 0.035 | 1 | |||||
| EAT-26 Bulimia | 0.185 ** | 0.357 ** | 1 | ||||
| EAT-26 Oral control | 0.111 * | 0.044 | 0.192 ** | 1 | |||
| EAT-26 Total score | 0.111 * | 0.894 ** | 0.588 ** | 0.431 ** | 1 | ||
| SATAQ Pressures | 0.372 ** | 0.071 | 0.233 ** | 0.161 ** | 0.168 ** | 1 | |
| SATAQ Information | 0.324 ** | 0.124 * | 0.150 ** | 0.199 ** | 0.204 ** | 0.585 ** | 1 |
Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Stepwise multiple linear regression predicting EAT-26 by demographic characteristics, OEQ and SATAQ scales.
| Adjusted R2 | β (B, Standard Error) Predictors | |
|---|---|---|
| EAT-26 | ||
| Dieting | 0.013 | −0.128 (−1.362, 0.576) Gender * |
| Bulimia | 0.061 | 0.220 (0.050, 0.012) SATAQ Pressures ** |
| −0.110 (0.014, 0.007) Age * | ||
| Oral control | 0.124 | −0.311 (−0.196, 0.032) BMI ** |
| 0.133 (0.057, 0.022) SATAQ Information * | ||
| Total score | 0.070 | 0.164 (0.202, 0.066) SATAQ Information ** |
| −0.164 (−0.088, 0.028) Age ** | ||
| −0.127 (−1.706, 0.723) Gender * |
Note: Gender was dummy coded such that 1 = male and 2 = female; Bs were unstandardized coefficients; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 1Path analysis of the relationship between OEQ, EAT-26, and SATAQ of participants. Note: OEQ = Obligatory Exercise Questionnaire; SATAQ = Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire; EAT-26 = Eating Attitudes Test-26; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Bootstrap analysis of the mediation effect size and significance test of SATAQ in OEQ and EAT-26.
| Path | Standardized | Standard Error | Effect Size | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Effect) | (Boot SE) | (%) | LL | UL | |
| OEQ→EAT-26 (Direct effect) | 0.090 | 0.017 | 42.86 | (−0.013, 0.054) | |
| OEQ→SATAQ→EAT-26 (Mediation effect) | 0.120 ** | 0.014 | 57.14 | (0.004, 0.059) | |
| OEQ→EAT-26 (Total effect) | 0.210 ** | 0.017 | 100 | (0.016, 0.084) | |
Note: CI confidence interval, LL lower limit, UL upper limit. ** p < 0.01.