| Literature DB >> 34959710 |
Nabil A Alhakamy1,2,3,4, Shaimaa M Badr-Eldin1,5, Waleed S Alharbi1, Mohamed A Alfaleh1,6, Omar D Al-Hejaili1, Hibah M Aldawsari1, Basma G Eid7, Rana Bakhaidar1, Filippo Drago8, Filippo Caraci9,10, Giuseppe Caruso9.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer currently represents a severe issue for the entire world. Therefore, much effort has been made to develop an effective treatment against it. Emerging evidence has shown that icariin, a flavonoid glycoside, is an effective anti-pancreatic cancer drug. Melittin, as a natural active biomolecule, has also shown to possess anticancer activities. In the present study, with the aim to increase its effectiveness against cancerous cells, icariin-loaded bilosome-melittin (ICA-BM) was developed. For the selection of an optimized ICA-BM, an experimental design was implemented, which provided an optimized formulation with a particle size equal to 158.4 nm. After estimation of the release pattern, the anti-pancreatic cancer efficacy of this new formulation was evaluated. The MTT assay was employed for the determination of half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), providing smaller IC50 for ICA-BM (2.79 ± 0.2 µM) compared to blank-BM and ICA-Raw (free drug) against PNAC1, a human pancreatic cancer cell line isolated from a pancreatic carcinoma of ductal cell origin. Additionally, cell cycle analysis for ICA-BM demonstrated cell arrest at the S-phase and pre-G1 phase, which indicated a pro-apoptotic behavior of the new developed formulation. The pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative activity of the optimized ICA-BM against PNAC1 cells was also demonstrated through annexin V staining as well as estimation of caspase-3 and p53 protein levels. It can be concluded that the optimized ICA-BM formulation significantly improved the efficacy of icariin against cancerous pancreatic cells.Entities:
Keywords: apoptosis; bilosomes; icariin; melittin; pancreatic cancer
Year: 2021 PMID: 34959710 PMCID: PMC8703505 DOI: 10.3390/ph14121309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
The obtained particle size from various trials by Box-Behnken experimental design for the ICA-BM.
| Factors | Response | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run | X1 | X2 | X3 | Size (nm) |
| 1 | 2.0 | 0.375 | 5.0 | 198 |
| 2 | 3.0 | 0.25 | 1.0 | 208 |
| 3 | 3.0 | 0.375 | 3.0 | 265 |
| 4 | 3.0 | 0.375 | 3.0 | 264 |
| 5 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 387 |
| 6 | 4.0 | 0.25 | 3.0 | 365 |
| 7 | 4.0 | 0.375 | 5.0 | 453 |
| 8 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 187 |
| 9 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 223 |
| 10 | 2.0 | 0.375 | 1.0 | 164 |
| 11 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 301 |
| 12 | 3.0 | 0.375 | 3.0 | 243 |
| 13 | 4.0 | 0.375 | 1.0 | 311 |
| 14 | 3.0 | 0.25 | 5.0 | 288 |
| 15 | 2.0 | 0.25 | 3.0 | 165 |
X1: cholesterol:Span 20 molar ratio; X2: bile salt molar concentration; X3: MEL concentration.
Statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the responses (particle size).
| Effect | Estimate | F-Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 200.5 | 1053.28 | 0.0000 |
| X2 | 18.0 | 8.49 | 0.0333 |
| X3 | 83.5 | 182.68 | 0.0000 |
| X1X1 | 45.1667 | 24.67 | 0.0042 |
| X1X2 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 1.0000 |
| X1X3 | 54.0 | 38.20 | 0.0016 |
| X2X2 | −7.83333 | 0.74 | 0.4284 |
| X2X3 | −1.0 | 0.01 | 0.9133 |
| X3X3 | 3.16667 | 0.12 | 0.7419 |
| R2 | 99.6195 | ||
| Adjusted R2 (adjusted for degree of freedom) | 98.9345 | ||
| Standard Error of estimated | 8.73689 | ||
| Mean absolute error | 3.64444 | ||
Figure 1Preto chart for particle size of ICA-BM formulations, where X1, X2, and X3 represent the concentration of cholesterol:Span 20 ratio, bile salt, and MEL.
Figure 2Contours of an estimated response surface for the particle size.
Figure 3In vitro release profile of optimized ICA-BM.
Figure 4IC50 of the Blank BM, erlotinib, ICA-Raw, and ICA-BM in the PANC1 cells. Data are the mean of 4 independent experiments ± standard deviation (SD). ϕϕϕ Significantly different vs. Blank BM (p < 0.001); θθθ Significantly different vs. Erlotinib (p < 0.001); ### Significantly different vs. ICA-Raw (p < 0.001).
Figure 5Effect of Blank BM, ICA-Raw, and ICA-BM on PANC1 cell cycle phases. Data are the mean of 4 independent experiments ± SD. * Significantly different vs. Control (p < 0.05); ** Significantly different vs. Control (p < 0.01); *** Significantly different vs. Control (p < 0.001); ϕϕϕ Significantly different vs. Blank BM (p < 0.001); ### Significantly different vs. ICA-Raw (p < 0.001).
Figure 6Effect of Blank BM, ICA-Raw, and ICA-BM on the percentage of apoptotic or necrotic PANC1 cells. Data are the mean of 4 independent experiments ± SD. * Significantly different vs. Control (p < 0.05); ** Significantly different vs. Control (p < 0.01); *** Significantly different vs. Control (p < 0.001); ϕϕϕ Significantly different vs. Blank BM (p < 0.001); ## Significantly different vs. ICA-Raw (p < 0.01); ### Significantly different vs. ICA-Raw (p < 0.001).
Figure 7Effect of Blank BM, ICA-Raw, and ICA-BM treatments on caspase-3 enzyme content in PANC1 cells. Data are the mean of 4 independent experiments ± SD. *** Significantly different vs. Control (p < 0.001); ϕϕ Significantly different vs. Blank BM (p < 0.01); ϕϕϕ Significantly different vs. Blank BM (p < 0.001); ### Significantly different vs. ICA-Raw (p < 0.001).
Figure 8Effect of Blank BM, ICA-Raw, and ICA-BM treatments on p53 content in PANC1 cells. Data are the mean of 4 independent experiments ± SD. *** Significantly different vs. Control (p < 0.001); ϕϕϕ Significantly different vs. Blank BM (p < 0.001); ### Significantly different vs. ICA-Raw (p < 0.001).
Factors involved in Box-Behnken design and their selected levels with the response and their constraints and goals.
| Factor | Low | High | Units |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4 | ||
| 0.25 | 0.5 | (mM) | |
| 1.0 | 5.0 | (% | |
|
| Low | High | Goal |
| 164 | 453 | minimize |