Michael Kresken1, Ingo Klare2, Thomas A Wichelhaus3, Esther Wohlfarth4, Franziska Layer-Nicolaou5, Bernd Neumann6, Guido Werner7. 1. Antiinfectives Intelligence GmbH, Cologne, Germany; Rheinische Fachhochschule Köln gGmbH, Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: michael.kresken@antiinfectives-intelligence.de. 2. Robert Koch Institute, Division Nosocomial Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistances, Wernigerode Branch, Germany. Electronic address: ingo.klare@gmx.de. 3. Institute of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Electronic address: Wichelhaus@em.uni-frankfurt.de. 4. Antiinfectives Intelligence GmbH, Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: esther.wohlfarth@antiinfectives-intelligence.de. 5. Robert Koch Institute, Division Nosocomial Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistances, Wernigerode Branch, Germany. Electronic address: LayerF@rki.de. 6. Robert Koch Institute, Division Nosocomial Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistances, Wernigerode Branch, Germany; Institute of Clinical Hygiene, Medical Microbiology and Infectiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany. Electronic address: Bernd.Neumann@klinikum-nuernberg.de. 7. Robert Koch Institute, Division Nosocomial Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistances, Wernigerode Branch, Germany. Electronic address: WernerG@rki.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of glycopeptide resistance in enterococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and to determine the susceptibilities of the identified glycopeptide-resistant isolates to dalbavancin. METHODS: Twenty-two medical laboratories participated in the study conducted in 2016/17 by the Paul-Ehrlich-Society for Chemotherapy. Each laboratory was asked to collect 30 Enterococcus spp. (limited to Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium) and 30 CoNS isolates consecutively from hospitalised patients with a proven or suspected infection. RESULTS: A total of 1285 isolates were collected, comprising 364 E. faecalis, 291 E. faecium and 630 CoNS. No E. faecalis isolates (0%) but 76 E. faecium isolates (26.1%) were vancomycin-resistant, of which 21 showed the VanA type and 55 the VanB type. The proportion of vancomycin-resistant strains among E. faecium isolates from patients in intensive care units (21.6%) was significantly lower than that from patients on regular wards (30.5%). Among the CoNS, 67 isolates (10.6%) were teicoplanin-resistant but none were vancomycin-resistant, with resistance only detected in Staphylococcus epidermidis (12.2%), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (17.9%) and Staphylococcus hominis (13.2%). Dalbavancin at ≤0.25 mg/L inhibited all VanB-type enterococci and 95.5% of teicoplanin-resistant CoNS. CONCLUSION: The level of glycopeptide resistance in E. faecalis remains very low in Germany but achieved 26% in E. faecium and was >10% in CoNS. Dalbavancin appears to be a feasible option for treating infections caused by VanB-type vancomycin-resistant E. faecium and teicoplanin-resistant CoNS.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of glycopeptide resistance in enterococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and to determine the susceptibilities of the identified glycopeptide-resistant isolates to dalbavancin. METHODS: Twenty-two medical laboratories participated in the study conducted in 2016/17 by the Paul-Ehrlich-Society for Chemotherapy. Each laboratory was asked to collect 30 Enterococcus spp. (limited to Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium) and 30 CoNS isolates consecutively from hospitalised patients with a proven or suspected infection. RESULTS: A total of 1285 isolates were collected, comprising 364 E. faecalis, 291 E. faecium and 630 CoNS. No E. faecalis isolates (0%) but 76 E. faecium isolates (26.1%) were vancomycin-resistant, of which 21 showed the VanA type and 55 the VanB type. The proportion of vancomycin-resistant strains among E. faecium isolates from patients in intensive care units (21.6%) was significantly lower than that from patients on regular wards (30.5%). Among the CoNS, 67 isolates (10.6%) were teicoplanin-resistant but none were vancomycin-resistant, with resistance only detected in Staphylococcus epidermidis (12.2%), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (17.9%) and Staphylococcus hominis (13.2%). Dalbavancin at ≤0.25 mg/L inhibited all VanB-type enterococci and 95.5% of teicoplanin-resistant CoNS. CONCLUSION: The level of glycopeptide resistance in E. faecalis remains very low in Germany but achieved 26% in E. faecium and was >10% in CoNS. Dalbavancin appears to be a feasible option for treating infections caused by VanB-type vancomycin-resistant E. faecium and teicoplanin-resistant CoNS.