| Literature DB >> 34958863 |
Sarah Kim1, Arnold Louie2, George L Drusano2, Mohammed Almoslem3, Soyoung Kim1, Jenny Myrick2, Jocelyn Nole2, Brandon Duncanson2, Charles A Peloquin4, Charles A Scanga5, Walter Yamada6, Michael Neely6, Stephan Schmidt7.
Abstract
In recent years, clofazimine (CFZ) has been regaining prominence for the treatment of tuberculosis. However, it shows limited efficacy as a single drug and optimal combination partners have not been identified. Therefore, the objective of our analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of CFZ-containing two-drug regimens with pretomanid (PMD), bedaquiline (BDQ) or linezolid (LZD) by: (i) determining their pharmacodynamic (PD) mode of interaction against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) strain H37Rv in log- phase and acid-phase metabolic states, and against Mtb strain 18b in a non-replicating persister (NRP) metabolic state; (ii) predicting bacterial cell kill of the drugs alone and in combination; and (iii) evaluating the relationship between the interaction mode and the extent of bacterial cell kill. The results of our Greco universal response surface analysis showed that CFZ was at least additive with a clear trend towards synergy when combined with PMD, BDQ and LZD against Mtb in all explored metabolic states under in vitro checkerboard assay conditions. The results further showed that all two-drug combination regimens exerted greater bacterial kill than any of the drugs alone. CFZ alone showed the least antimicrobial efficacy amongst the evaluated drugs, and there was a lack of correlation between the mode of interaction and the extent of bacterial kill. However, we may underestimate the effect of CFZ in this screening approach owing to limited in vitro study duration and neglect of target site accumulation. Clofazimine; Pretomanid; Bedaquiline; Linezolid; Combination chemotherapy; Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Entities:
Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; bedaquiline; clofazimine; combination chemotherapy; linezolid; pretomanid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34958863 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106509
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents ISSN: 0924-8579 Impact factor: 5.283