Literature DB >> 34958418

Impact of polystyrene microplastics on major marine primary (phytoplankton) and secondary producers (copepod).

P Raju1, P Santhanam2, S Sonai Pandian1, M Divya1,3, A Arunkrishnan1, K Nanthini Devi1, S Ananth4, J Roopavathy5, P Perumal1.   

Abstract

The effect of microplastic adsorption on marine microalgae Tetraselmis suecica, Amphora subtropica, and copepod Pseudodiaptomus annandalei was investigated in the present study. Fluorescence microscopic images were used to evaluate MP interactions with algae and copepods. T. suecica growth rate decreased with effects of 0.1 µm polystyrene exposure to 75 µl/100 ml (0.899 to 0.601 abs), 50 µl/100 ml (0.996 to 0.632 abs) and 25 µl/100 ml (0.996 to 0.632 abs), respectively. On the other hand, at 10th day of experiment, the control T. suecica showed the highest growth rate (0.965 abs), chlorophyll concentration (Chl-'a' = 21.36 µg/L; Chl-'b' = 13.65 µg/L), and cell density (3.3 × 106 cells/ml). A marine diatom A. subtropica absorbed 2.0 μm microplastics, and the maximal inhibition rate increased at higher MP concentration until 10th day. The highest MPs (75 μl/100 ml) treatment resulted in decreased growth rate of A. subtropica from 0.163 to 0.096 abs. A. subtropica (without MPs) had the highest lipid concentration of 27.15%, whereas T. suecica had the lowest lipid concentration of 11.2% (without MP). The maximum survival (80%) of P. annandalei was found in control on 15th day whereas on 12th day, the microplastics ingested copepod had the lowest survival rate (0%). On 15th day, the maximum Nauplii Production Rate (NPR) (19.33) female-1 was observed in control, whereas the minimum (17.33) female-1 NPR was observed in copepod ingested with MPs. The maximum lipid production (17.33% without MPs) was reported in control, whereas MPs fed copepods had the lowest lipid production (16%). Long-term exposure to polystyrene microplastics significantly reduced algae growth and chlorophyll concentration and also NPR and lipid concentration rate of copepod. We inferred that microplastic exposure of algae and copepods might results in persistent decreases in ingested carbon biomass over time.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diatom; Microalgae; Microplastics; Pseudodiaptomus annandalei; Total lipids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34958418     DOI: 10.1007/s00203-021-02697-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Microbiol        ISSN: 0302-8933            Impact factor:   2.552


  16 in total

1.  Establishment of numerical beach-litter hindcast/forecast models: an application to Goto Islands, Japan.

Authors:  Shin'ichiro Kako; Atsuhiko Isobe; Shinya Magome; Hirofumi Hinata; Satoquo Seino; Azusa Kojima
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton.

Authors:  Matthew Cole; Pennie Lindeque; Elaine Fileman; Claudia Halsband; Rhys Goodhead; Julian Moger; Tamara S Galloway
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Applications and societal benefits of plastics.

Authors:  Anthony L Andrady; Mike A Neal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Marine neustonic microplastics around the southeastern coast of Korea.

Authors:  Jung-Hoon Kang; Oh Youn Kwon; Kyun-Woo Lee; Young Kyoung Song; Won Joon Shim
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 5.553

5.  A decadal prediction of the quantity of plastic marine debris littered on beaches of the East Asian marginal seas.

Authors:  Shin'ichiro Kako; Atsuhiko Isobe; Tomoya Kataoka; Hirofumi Hinata
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.553

Review 6.  (Nano)plastics in the environment - Sources, fates and effects.

Authors:  João Pinto da Costa; Patrícia S M Santos; Armando C Duarte; Teresa Rocha-Santos
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Current opinion: What is a nanoplastic?

Authors:  Julien Gigault; Alexandra Ter Halle; Magalie Baudrimont; Pierre-Yves Pascal; Fabienne Gauffre; Thuy-Linh Phi; Hind El Hadri; Bruno Grassl; Stéphanie Reynaud
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 8.  Microplastics in freshwater systems: A review on occurrence, environmental effects, and methods for microplastics detection.

Authors:  Jingyi Li; Huihui Liu; J Paul Chen
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Effects of inorganic ions and natural organic matter on the aggregation of nanoplastics.

Authors:  Li Cai; Lingling Hu; Huahong Shi; Junwei Ye; Yunfei Zhang; Hyunjung Kim
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Microplastics in mussels along the coastal waters of China.

Authors:  Jiana Li; Xiaoyun Qu; Lei Su; Weiwei Zhang; Dongqi Yang; Prabhu Kolandhasamy; Daoji Li; Huahong Shi
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 8.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.