| Literature DB >> 34957401 |
Md Abdur Rahman1, Rinku Rani Paul1, Chaina Biswas1, Hakima Akter1, Razina Rouf2, Sushmita Nath3, Jamil A Shilpi1, Lutfun Nahar4, Stayajit D Sarker3, Shaikh Jamal Uddin1.
Abstract
Plants act as a rich source of novel natural pesticides. In the backdrop of the recent revival of interest in developing plant-based insecticides, this study was carried out to investigate the pesticidal activity of Sundarban mangrove plants. A total of nine different plant parts from five plants, namely, Aegiceras corniculatum, Excoecaria agallocha, Heritiera fomes, Xylocarpus moluccensis, and Xylocarpus granatum, were extracted with methanol and tested for insecticidal activity against two common stored product pests Sitophilus oryzae and Sitophilus zeamais using direct contact feeding deterrent wafer disc method. Three bark extracts from A. corniculatum, E. agallocha, and H. fomes showed potent and statistically significant insecticidal activity against both S. oryzae and S. zeamais pests (80-100% mortality). All the active bark extracts were further fractionated using C-18 solid-phase extraction (SPE) columns and tested for their insecticidal activity against S. oryzae pest to identify the active fraction. Only the SPE4 fraction (100% MeOH) from all the three active plants showed the activity against S. oryzae pest with a lethal concentration 50% (LC50) value of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg/disc for A. corniculatum, E. agallocha, and H. fomes, respectively. The active fraction of A. corniculatum was further profiled for identification of active compounds using LC-ESI-MS and identified (along with some unknown peaks) two previously reported compounds at m/z 625.17630 (isorhamnetin 3-O-rutinoside) and 422.25346 (paspaline) as major constituents. Insecticidal activities of these plants are reported in this study for the first time and would be useful in promoting research aiming for the development of new biopesticides from mangrove plants.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34957401 PMCID: PMC8695028 DOI: 10.1155/2021/1540336
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci ISSN: 2633-4690
List of collected Sundarban plant species for methanol extraction, their traditional uses, part used, and extraction yields [24]].
| Plant name | Family | Local name | Traditional uses | Part used | Extraction yield (%)∗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Myrsinaceae | Kholisha | Rheumatism, painful arthritis, inflammation, and fish poison | Bark | 13.5 |
|
| Euphorbiaceae | Geoa | Epilepsy, conjunctivitis, dermatitis, hematuria, leprosy toothache, and fish poison | Bark | 7.2 |
|
| Sterculiaceae | Sundari | GIT disorders, hepatic disorders, skin diseases, diabetes, and goiter | Bark | 8.9 |
| Leaf | 10.2 | ||||
|
| Meliaceae | Dhundul | Antibacterial, malaria, inflammation, dysentery, diarrhea, cholera, CNS depressant, and anticancer | Bark | 17.1 |
|
| Meliaceae | Pashur | Fever, inflammation, dysentery, diarrhea, cholera, and abdominal problems | Bark | 14.1 |
| Leaf | 4.7 | ||||
| Fruit | 13.3 | ||||
| Pneumatophore | 23.2 |
Extraction yield (%) = dry weight of methanol extract/dry weight of test plant part) x100.
Insecticidal activity of the methanolic crude extract of Sundarban plants against S. oryzae and S. zeamais insects at 2.5 mg/disc concentration.
| Name of plant extract | Plant part¥ | No. of insect | No of dead adult | No of dead adult | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days after treatment | Days after treatment | |||||||
| 5th | 5th | 15th | 5th | 5th | 15th | |||
|
| B | 10 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 8.3 ± 0.3 | 9.6 ± 0.3 | 5.0 ± 0.5 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 8.3 ± 0.8 |
|
| B | 10 | 7.7 ± 0.3 | 9.0 ± 0.6 | 10 ± 0.0 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 8.0 ± 0.5 | 9.3 ± 0.6 |
|
| B | 10 | 4.6 ± 0.3 | 8.3 ± 1.6 | 10 ± 0.0 | 5.0 ± 0.6 | 6.3 ± 0.8 | 10 ± 0.0 |
| L | 10 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 3.6 ± 0.8∗ | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 1.3 ± 0.33 | 3.6 ± 0.3 | |
|
| B | 10 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.5 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.33 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.33 |
|
| B | 10 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 3.0 ± 0.5 | 5.0 ± 0.6 | 0.33 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 1.6 ± 0.3 |
| L | 10 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.6 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 1 ± 0.6 | 2.6 ± 0.33 | 7.3 ± 1.4 | |
| F | 10 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 1 ± 0.0 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | |
| P | 10 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 1 ± 0.6 | 2.3 ± 1.4 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.5 | |
| Permethrin (2.0 mg/disc) | - | 10 | 7.6 ± 0.3 | 8.3 ± 0.4 | 10 ± 0.0 | 8.0 ± 0.6 | 9.0 ± 0.5 | 10 ± 0.0 |
| Control disc (vehicle) | - | 10 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.6 |
¥ B= Bark, L = leaf, F = fruit, P = pneumatophore; results are expressed as mean ± SEM. p < 0.001 vs. control.
Insecticidal activity of the SPE4 fractions of A. corniculatum, E. agallocha, and H. fomes against S. oryzae insect at 2.0 mg/disc and their LC50.
| Name of plant | Fraction | No. of insects | No of dead adult insects | % of mortality | Lethal concentration 50% (LC50) mg/disc | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days after treatment | |||||||
| 5th | 10th | 15th | |||||
|
| SPE4 | 10 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 7.3 ± 0.47 | 9.7 ± 0.5 | 97 | 0.5 |
|
| SPE4 | 10 | 2.0 ± 0.6 | 5.3 ± 0.5 | 9.0 ± 0.7 | 90 | 1.0 |
|
| SPE4 | 10 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 8.0 ± 0.6 | 80 | 1.5 |
| Pemethrin | - | 10 | 5.6 ± 0.8 | 6.3 ± 1.2 | 10 ± 0.0 | 100 | 0.4 |
| Control (vehicle only) | - | 10 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 10 | - |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. p < 0.001 vs. control.
Figure 1LC-ESI-MS chromatogram of a base peak [M+ H]+ with m/z 625.17598 at 6.05 min present in SPE4 fraction of A. corniculatum for the identified flavonol compound (1).
Figure 2LC-ESI-MS chromatogram of a base peak [M+ H]+ with m/z 422.25332 at 7.84 min present in SPE4 fraction of A. corniculatum for the identified indole-diterpenoid compound (2).