| Literature DB >> 34957029 |
Saša Ðurić1, Špela Bogataj1,2, Vinko Zovko3, Vedrana Sember1.
Abstract
There is evidence that physical activity (PA) can improve the academic performance. We recruited healthy adolescent girls, aged 11-12 years, and measured their PA with the accelerometer ActiGraph GT3X for the consecutive 5 days. Physical fitness (PF) was measured with eight motoric tests and three anthropometry measures. Academic performance (AP) was assessed for the six academic narrated school subjects. The results revealed that the girls were more physically active during the week days and less active at weekend (557 vs. 516 counts/min). Physical education grade shows the highest overall correlations with the results of the PF test battery (r = 0.53-0.95, p < 0.01). Nevertheless, correlations surprisingly decrease for the combined daily PA (r = 0.45), especially the weekend PA (r = 0.28). Grade point average and PF correlated moderately (r = 0.43-0.64), while they were moderate to high for PA (r = 0.59-0.87). Many questions arose after the completion of the present study and several new topics opened up, such as the question of how parental education affects the duration of PA and AP of the children and the influence of the place of residence AP of the children.Entities:
Keywords: academic performance; girls; grade point average; mathematic grade; physical activity; physical fitness
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34957029 PMCID: PMC8695801 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.778837
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Descriptive statistics of the physical fitness of the pupils.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taping (n) | 42.3 | 2.8 | 37.0 | 47.0 | 6.7 |
| Long jump (cm) | 178.8 | 27.5 | 130.0 | 230.0 | 15.4 |
| Polygon backwards (s) | 13.5 | 8.7 | 8.4 | 45.0 | 6.5 |
| Sit-ups (n) | 49.3 | 10.8 | 30.0 | 63.0 | 21.9 |
| Stand and reach (cm) | 49.0 | 6.6 | 35.0 | 60.0 | 13.6 |
| Bent arm hang (s) | 51.7 | 36.1 | 3.0 | 120.0 | 69.8 |
| Sprint 60 m (s) | 9.9 | 1.0 | 8.6 | 12.2 | 9.9 |
| Running 600 m (s) | 150.8 | 33.5 | 109.0 | 215.0 | 22.2 |
Mean, averaged value; SD, standard deviation; Min, minimum value; Max, maximum value; CV%, coefficient of variation.
Figure 1Combined physical activity (PA), weekday PA, and weekend PA of adolescent school girls.
Sports participation and commuting of included participants.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engaging in sport | Additional sport | 12,5% | 25,0% | 12,5% | 50,0% |
| Without additional sport | 50,0% | 12,5% | 12,5% | 25,0% | |
| Commuting | Active | 0,0% | 28,6% | 14,3% | 57,1% |
| Driven | 55,6% | 11,1% | 11,1% | 22,2% | |
Very low PA (<30 min of PA/day); low PA (>30 min PA/day <450 min PA/day); normal PA (>45 min PA/day <60 min PA/day); high PA (>60 min PA/day).
Descriptive statistics for academic performance.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 3.44 | 0.93 |
| Slovene language | 3.78 | 0.80 |
| English language | 3.34 | 1.02 |
| Second language | 3.56 | 0.85 |
| Physical Education | 4.25 | 0.70 |
| GPA | 4.10 | 0.64 |
AP, academic performance; Mean grade, average grade throughout the school year for selected subject or GPA; SD, standard deviation; GPA, grade point average.
Figure 2Correlation between physical fitness and academic performance, and physical activity and academic performance. Statistically significant correlations were marked with *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.