Literature DB >> 34956949

Predictors of death in patients with COVID-19: A cross-sectional study in West of Iran.

Manoochehr Karami1,2, Mohammad Mirzaei3, Fatemeh Shahbazi1,4, Fariba Keramat5, Ebrahim Jalili6, Saeid Bashirian7, Rashid Heidarimoghadam8, Jalal Bathaei3, Salman Khazaei9,10.   

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a contagious disease caused by a newly identified coronavirus. Our knowledge about the survival rate and prognostic factors of the disease is not established well. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictors of COVID-19 mortality in Hamadan province in western Iran.
Methods: In this study, we included all laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases with known treatment outcomes in Hamadan province, Iran, between 20, 2020, to May 10, 2020. Demographic, clinical, laboratory data, and treatment outcomes were obtained from computerized medical records and compared between survived cases and patients with death outcomes. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the predictors of death.
Results: From 749 investigated patients, 77 patients (10.28%) died during the treatment. The Mean age of patients was 53.97±19.04 years. Multivariable logistic regression showed that males had 2.07 (95% CI: 1.73, 2.54) fold higher odds of death. Those with 60 years old and more had 6.49 (95% CI: 4.53, 7.93) fold higher odds of death. Patients with an underlying disease had 7.14 (95% CI: 6.94, 7.38) fold higher odds of death, and patients who were hospitalized in the ICU ward had 2.24 (95% CI: 1.75, 2.90) times higher odds of COVID-19 related mortality.
Conclusion: The potential predictors of death in COVID-19 cases, including the male gender, older age, and having an underlying disease could help physicians to identify patients with poor prognoses at an early stage and better management of them.
© 2021 Iran University of Medical Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Coronavirus; Epidemiology; Iran; Mortality

Year:  2021        PMID: 34956949      PMCID: PMC8683832          DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.35.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran        ISSN: 1016-1430


↑What is “already known” in this topic:

A critical point for better management of COVID-19 is identifying the factors affecting patient mortality by each geographical area.

→What this article adds:

Analyzing the data from 749 confirmed cases indicated that men, the elderly over 60 years old, people with underlying diseases and patients who were admitted to the ICU unit were more likely to die from coronavirus infection.

Introduction

An outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection first emerged in late 2019 in Wuhan, China resulting in more than 80000 confirmed cases in this country and being exported to a growing number of countries (1). World Health Organization (WHO) declares a global public health emergency over the COVID-19 outbreak on 30 January 2020. Alongside severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), COVID-19 is another common type of coronavirus that infects humans (2). Although the outbreak is possible to have originated from a zoonotic transmission event correlated with a great seafood marketplace that too traded in live wild animals, it quickly converted clear that efficient person-to-person transmission was also happening (3). The clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 infection seems to be widespread, including asymptomatic infection, mild upper respiratory tract disorder, and severe viral pneumonia with respiratory malfunction and also death (4-6). Based on previous epidemiological research, mortality is higher between men, the elderly, and residents in rural area. The typical clinical characteristics of subjects with COVID-19 were weakness, fever, dry cough, and dyspnea (5-7). It was published that existing diseases such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus are important risk factors for the fatality of patients affected by COVID-19 (5,6,8). To the best of the author’s knowledge, no earlier studies have been committed to established death cases in Hamadan province. Also, the epidemiological and clinical features of approved death cases in the Hamadan province have not yet been described. Therefore, the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of death cases with COVID-19 were summarized with the intent of early identification of critically ill patients, thereby reducing mortality. To understand the characteristics of patients who die of COVID-19, we evaluated the outcome of 749 COVID-19 confirmed cases in the west of Iran.

Methods

This study was conducted on 749 confirmed COVID-19 cases according to WHO interim guidance, treated in all hospitals affiliated to Hamadan University of Medical Sciences between February 20, 2020, and May 10, 2020. In this study, a known treatment outcome was considered as inclusion criteria, and those who died or were discharged with good condition were entered into the study. The protocol of the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. In this study, the diagnosis of COVID-19 was based on the result of real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) detection and cases with positive RT-PCR on samples collected from upper respiratory oropharyngeal swabs, with or without nasopharyngeal swabs and sputum were considered as a confirmed case. A standardized data collection tool contains demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, laboratory findings, chest CT examination, and disease outcomes of identified cases were used for collecting data. Demographic and clinical data including signs, symptoms and underlying disease history, were asked directly from the patients and when the patient was unable to respond due to a bad physical condition, the information was taken with the physician, his/her families or referring to the patients' medical records. Biochemical blood test results were gathered by referring to the patient's medical record. Finally, the gathered data was transported to the deputy of health. Descriptive statistics were reported as number (%) for categorical variables and mean (SD) for continuous variables across the patient’s background. Univariable logistic regression was conducted to estimate the crude association between demographic, laboratory, and clinical characteristics of patients and disease outcomes (Remission/ Death). Those with P-value < 0.2 were considered as potential significant determinants of death and were included in multivariable logistic regression. All statistical analyses were conducted in Stata version 14 software. A significant level was considered less than 5%.

Results

Up to April 20, 2020, a total of 749 confirmed COVID-19 patients were diagnosed in hospitals, as well as outpatient care centers affiliated to Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. Of them, 77 patients died during the treatment (case fatality rate: 10.28%). Baseline characteristics of identified COVID-19 cases are shown in Figure 1. The number of 375 (50.07%) cases were males, and 529 (70.63%) were urban dwellers. The Mean age of them was 53.97±19.04 years and in total, only 16 (2.14%) of patients were under 20 years of age.
Fig. 1
A full comparison of demographic and clinical variables of survived cases compared with those dead, as well as the results of univariable logistic regression analyses associated with death, are presented in Table 1. In univariable analysis male gender (OR: 1.75, 95 CI: 1.08, 2.95), age groups 60 years and older (OR: 12.26, 95 CI: 11.12, 13.42), having an underlying disease (OR: 9.58, 95% CI: 8.84, 10.14), abnormal lung CT scan findings (OR: 2.67, 95 CI: 1.69, 3.55), having chest pain (OR: 2.27, 95 CI: 1.08, 4.06) and hospitalized in the ICU ward (OR: 2.24, 95 CI: 1.75, 2.90), were potentially associated with higher odds of death in COVID-19 cases (p<0.05).
Table 1

Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics between recovered and dead COVID-19 cases as well as univariable logistic regression

Variable RecoveredN= 672 (89.72%) DeathN= 77 (10.28%) pCrude model
OR (95% CI)p
Gender
Female345 (92.25)29 (7.75)0.023References0.024
Male327 (87.20)48 (12.80)1.75 (1.08, 2.84)
Age group (Year)
< 40197 (98.01)4 (1.99)0.001References
40-59 230 (95.04)12 (4.96)2.46 (0.82, 8.09)0.110
60+245 (80.07)61 (19.93)12.26 (4.38, 34.31)0.001
Location
Urban478 (90.36)51 (9.64)0.370References0.370
Rural194 (88.18)26 (11.82)1.26 (0.76, 2.07)
Underling diseases
No501 (96.53)18 (3.47)0.001References0.001
Yes171 (74.35)59 (25.65)9.58 (5.50, 16.70)
Lung CT Scan findings
Normal612 (90.67)63 (9.33)0.010References0.012
Abnormal60 (81.08)14 (18.92)2.67 (1.20, 4.29)
Chest pain
No601 (90.24)65 (9.76)0.180References0.012
Yes71 (85.54)12 (14.46)2.27 (1.2, 4.29)
Respiratory distress
No180 (89.55)21 (10.45)0.930References0.930
Yes492 (89.78)56 (10.22)0.98 (0.57, 1.66)
Hospital ward
General531 (91.71)48 (8.29)0.001References0.001
ICU141 (82.94)29 (17.06)2.27 (1.38, 3.73)
Baseline characteristics of identified COVID-19 cases with known treatment outcomes in Hamadan province Table 2 shows the results of the multivariate logistic regression. After adjusting for other variables, males had 2.09 fold higher odds of death ([OR=2.09, 95% CI: 1.22, 3.60)], p=0.007). Compared to patients under 40 years of age, patients with 60 years and more had 6.49 fold higher odds of death ([OR=6.49, 95% CI: 2.23, 18.88)], P=0.001). Patients with an underlying disease had 7.14 fold higher odds of death (p<0.001), and patients who were hospitalized in ICU had 2.24 times higher odds of COVID-19 related mortality (p=0.005). As shown in Figure 2, the area under the curve (AUC) for assessing the discriminant power of the explanatory variables for COVID-19 related death is 0.85, which indicates the entry of important variables into the model.
Table 2

Multivariable analysis of demographic and clinical characteristics associated with death from COVID-19

Variable Multivariable model
OR (95% CI)p
Gender
FemaleReferences0.007
Male2.09 (1.22, 3.60)
Age group (Year)
< 40References
40-59 1.61 (0.49, 5.27)0430
60+6.49 (2.23, 18.88)0.001
Underling diseases
NoReferences0.001
Yes7.14 (3.98, 12.82)
Hospital ward
GeneralReferences0.005
ICU2.24 (1.28, 3.94)
Fig. 2
The area under the curve (AUC) for assessing the discriminant power of the explanatory variables for COVID-19 related death

Discussion

This study proposed to determine risk factors associated with death in identified COVID-19 cases in Hamadan province. The demographic features such as age, sex, residence, cause of death, and comorbidities of the cases were obtained from the patients' medical records. In particular, the male gender, elderly over 60 years, having an underlying disease, and hospitalization in the ICU ward were associated with higher odds of COVID-19 related death. The current study verified that increased age was associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19. This result is in concordance with the previous research, which demonstrated a higher case fatality rate between the elderly populations (9,10). Elderly people, because they have a less capable cell-mediated immune response to infectious challenges, are more susceptible to infection. On the other hand, based on the previous research, aging has been expressed as an important independent risk factor for mortality in SARS-CoV and MERS- CoV. Early studies in macaques treated with SARS-CoV found that older macaques had more powerful host innate responses to virus infection than more juvenile adults, with an increase in differential expression of genes correlated with inflammation, whereas expression of type I interferon beta was decreased. The age-dependent defects in T-cell and B-cell function and the excess generation of type 2 cytokines could lead to a deficiency in control of viral replication and more prolonged proinflammatory responses, potentially leading to a poor outcome (11). Analysis of data showed that the chance of death due to COVID-19 in men is 2.09 times higher than in women. Epidemiological studies show that males experiencing higher CFRs compared with females after COVID-19 infection (12,13). Investigations from mainland China showed that men manifest more serious forms of the disease during the COVID-19 epidemic compared to women (14,15). Male dominance in cases of COVID-19 has been reported by other countries as well (16-18). On the other hand, this limited sensitivity of women to viral contaminations can be assigned to the protection from sex hormones and the X chromosome, which play a crucial function in intrinsic and adaptive stability (5). From another perspective, a greater incidence rate of COVID-19 in males might be due to greater social communications in workplaces. Federal service for statistics in 2019 stated that men include 81 percent of the workforce in Iran, while more than 50 percent of them are engaged in service jobs. Consequently, there is a higher chance for men to get SARS-CoV2 infection due to higher social interactions in work settings (19,20). According to the information presented in this article, more than 70% of the patients in this research were residents in urban areas. The accumulation of cases in urban areas may occur due to agents associated with access to healthcare or incomplete or poor surveillance and monitoring in rural areas (21,22). Another interesting finding of this research is that having an underlying disease increases the chance of death from COVID-19 (4-6). Based on the previous case series in 2020, the incidence of underlying diseases such as hypertension and subsequent hospitalization in the invasive care unit and death has been reported in patients with COVID-19 (23,24). In the present study, the proportion of death in patients with abnormal lung CT scans was significantly higher (18.92% vs. 9.33%). According to the researches, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus contaminates the lungs by the angiotensin-converting enzyme II receptor (25). More research is required to determine the mechanism of COVID-19. Also, clinical investigations are needed to verify whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers could stay profitable for cases with COVID-19. The study has some limitations. Due to the retrospective study design, not all epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory data were done in all patients. Second, due to the small sample size, the external validity of the study decreases. However, by including all patients in the study population, we considered our study is representative of cases diagnosed and treated in Hamadan province. Third, our data were from patients who died during late April 2020, and they may not be representative of later cases of COVID-19. Fourth, there may occur selection bias because mainly patients with relatively severe COVID-19 pneumonia were hospitalized during this period and moderate patients are not admitted to the hospitals.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study introduced several factors that associated with death from COVID-19 infection. The potential predictors of death in COVID-19 cases, including the male gender, older age, and having an underlying disease could help physicians to identify patients with poor prognoses at an early stage and better management of them.

Acknowledgment

Deputy of Research and Technology of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences approved our study (ID: IR.UMSHA.REC.1400.155). We would like to gratefully acknowledge all hospital staff involved in treating COVID-19 patients. Conflict of Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  20 in total

1.  SARS in Singapore--predictors of disease severity.

Authors:  Hoe-Nam Leong; Arul Earnest; Hong-Huay Lim; Chee-Fang Chin; Colin S H Tan; Mark E Puhaindran; Alex C H Tan; Mark I C Chen; Yee-Sin Leo
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.473

2.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.

Authors:  Qun Li; Xuhua Guan; Peng Wu; Xiaoye Wang; Lei Zhou; Yeqing Tong; Ruiqi Ren; Kathy S M Leung; Eric H Y Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Xuesen Xing; Nijuan Xiang; Yang Wu; Chao Li; Qi Chen; Dan Li; Tian Liu; Jing Zhao; Man Liu; Wenxiao Tu; Chuding Chen; Lianmei Jin; Rui Yang; Qi Wang; Suhua Zhou; Rui Wang; Hui Liu; Yinbo Luo; Yuan Liu; Ge Shao; Huan Li; Zhongfa Tao; Yang Yang; Zhiqiang Deng; Boxi Liu; Zhitao Ma; Yanping Zhang; Guoqing Shi; Tommy T Y Lam; Joseph T Wu; George F Gao; Benjamin J Cowling; Bo Yang; Gabriel M Leung; Zijian Feng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 176.079

3.  Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Nanshan Chen; Min Zhou; Xuan Dong; Jieming Qu; Fengyun Gong; Yang Han; Yang Qiu; Jingli Wang; Ying Liu; Yuan Wei; Jia'an Xia; Ting Yu; Xinxin Zhang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Single-Cell RNA Expression Profiling of ACE2, the Receptor of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Yu Zhao; Zixian Zhao; Yujia Wang; Yueqing Zhou; Yu Ma; Wei Zuo
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Survival Rates and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Registry-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Shahbazi; Manoochehr Karami; Mohammad Mirzaei; Younes Mohammadi
Journal:  J Res Health Sci       Date:  2021-04-24

6.  Pandemic potential of 2019-nCoV.

Authors:  Robin Thompson
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 25.071

7.  Do men have a higher case fatality rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome than women do?

Authors:  J Karlberg; D S Y Chong; W Y Y Lai
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges.

Authors:  Chih-Cheng Lai; Tzu-Ping Shih; Wen-Chien Ko; Hung-Jen Tang; Po-Ren Hsueh
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 5.283

9.  Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Ting Yu; Ronghui Du; Guohui Fan; Ying Liu; Zhibo Liu; Jie Xiang; Yeming Wang; Bin Song; Xiaoying Gu; Lulu Guan; Yuan Wei; Hui Li; Xudong Wu; Jiuyang Xu; Shengjin Tu; Yi Zhang; Hua Chen; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Socio-economic inequality in global incidence and mortality rates from coronavirus disease 2019: an ecological study.

Authors:  F Shahbazi; S Khazaei
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2020-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.