Literature DB >> 34956941

Factors affecting systolic blood pressure trajectory in low and high activity conditions.

Saiedeh Haji-Maghsoudi1, Azadeh Mozayani Monfared2, Majid Sadeghifar3, Ghodratollah Roshanaei1,4, Hossein Mahjub1,5.   

Abstract

Background: Typically, blood pressure dips during sleep and increases during daytime. The blood pressure trend is affected by the autonomic nervous system. The activity of this system is observable in the low and high activity conditions. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of individual characteristics on systolic blood pressure (SBP) across day-night under low and high activity conditions.
Methods: The samples were 34 outpatients who were candidates for evaluation of 24 hours of blood pressure with an ambulatory. They were admitted to the heart clinic of Farshchian hospital, located in Hamadan province in the west of Iran. The hourly SBP during 24 hours was considered as a response variable. To determine the factors effecting SBP in each condition, the hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM), with 2 hidden states of low and high activity, was fitted to the data.
Results: Males had lower SBP than females in both states. The effect of age was positive in the low activity state (β=0.30; p<0.001) and negative in high activity state (β= -0.21; p=0.001). The positive effect of cigarette smoking on SBP was seen in low activity state (β=5.02; p=0.029). The overweight and obese patients had higher SBP compared to others in high activity state (β=11.60; p<0.001 and β=5.87; p=0.032, respectively).
Conclusion: The SBP variability can be displayed by hidden states of low and high activity. Moreover, the effects of studied variables on SBP were different in low and high activity states.
© 2021 Iran University of Medical Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity; Ambulatory monitoring; Body mass index; Cigarette smoking; Systolic blood pressure

Year:  2021        PMID: 34956941      PMCID: PMC8683785          DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.35.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran        ISSN: 1016-1430


↑What is “already known” in this topic:

Various studies have examined the relationship between age, gender, body mass, and smoking on systolic blood pressure. However, in the studies, the constant time effect of the variables have been evaluated.

→What this article adds:

The time-varying effects of age, gender, body mass, and smoking on systolic blood pressure were investigated under low and high activity conditions during the day-night.

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and stroke are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide (1). About 17 million deaths occur due to CVD annually. Among heart diseases, at least 45% of deaths are related to hypertension each year (2). High blood pressure is an important public health concern that is also preventable (3, 4). Blood pressure (BP) has fluctuations during a day-night. BP has the lower value at night, especially during sleeping. It starts to rise before waking up, then it has 2 peaks; the first: 2 or 3 hours after awakening; second: in early evening (5 - 7). This means the interindividual BP changes dynamically during 24 hours (8). These variations are influenced by the multilateral interaction of either external environmental and behavioral factors or the intrinsic mechanisms of cardiovascu lar regulation (9). The difference in BP profiles in day to night is affected by both activity levels of individuals and cycles of sleep and wake during 24 hours. Some influential mechanisms for these variations include decreasing the activity of sympathetic system during night (10) and renal sodium (11). BP and its decline in sleep time are important risk factors for CVD (7). The prevalence of some cardiovascular events is greatest in early morning (12 , 13). It is due to changes from sleep to the wakefulness state, which is associated with increased blood pressure, heart rate, and activity of the sympathetic nervous system (12). One limitation of previous studies is considering fixed clock hours for awaking and sleep time, which leads to inaccurate definition of daytime and nighttime. Therefore, calculation of BP during the rest and activity states may not be realistic (7). In recent years, longitudinal studies have increased in widespread fields, especially in medical and epidemiological research areas (14). Unlike cross-sectional studies in which the response is measured at a one-time point, in longitudinal studies, individual responses are collected at several time points (15). The main advantages of recording data at multiple time points are obtaining a more accurate evaluation of the outcome and effects of covariates during the time course. (16). In longitudinal studies, the temporal change of response is measured directly. In addition, some parts of changes are related to unobserved variables (17). There are several approaches for analysis of longitudinal data, such as mixed models and marginal models (18). The time-varying unobservable variables can be covered by other approaches. One interesting approach in analyzing such data is using hidden Markov models (HMMs) (19). In recent years, HMMs have been welcomed by researchers in epidemiologic and medical studies. The HMMs consist of 2 observed and unobserved processes. The observed process is conditional on a hidden process with finite states. This means the observed value at any time is affected by a hidden state at the same time. In a special case, the state of hidden process at any time depends only on the state in the previous time (19). In medical studies, hidden states can be a person's health status, which is not a well-defined quantity. Therefore, it seems reasonable that the health condition is not observed directly (20). The application of HMM in medical studies can be seen in analysis of hospital infection (21), electrocardiogram signal analysis (22), progression of liver cirrhosis (23), disease biomarker data (24), and risky teenage driving behavior (25). Hidden semi-Markov models (HSMMs) are generalization of HMMs. They are more flexible than HMMs in terms of occupancy distribution (26). The HSMMs have been used in many scientific areas such as pattern recognition (27 , 28), rainfall (29 , 30), and medical sciences (31 , 32). Usually, the diagnosis of hypertension and decision-making for treatment is based on daytime blood pressure (7). Compared with the traditional method, ambulatory BP monitoring measures the patients’ systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) pressure when they do regular daily activities without restriction during the day-night. This device usually records BP every half-hour during the day and hourly at night. The role of autonomic nervous system in the regulation of BP is important (33). The cardiovascular system is associated with the autonomic nervous system. The sympathetic and parasympathetic activities are determiners of high and low heart rates (33, 34). Therefore, activation of autonomic nervous system can be considered as a hidden process with low and high activity states for BP trend. Based on our knowledge there is no comprehensive study to evaluate the effects of individual characteristics on BP trend in 24 hours for low and high activity periods. As HSMMs are able to evaluate the effects of covariates on response variable in different hidden states, the aim of this study was to evaluate factors affecting on 24-hour SBP variability under a dynamic model using HSMMs.

Methods

In this observational study, 34 outpatients who were candidate for ambulatory monitoring were included in the study. They were referred by a cardiologist to the clinic of Farshchian heart center hospital in Hamadan, a city in the west of Iran. They were candidates for assessment of their blood pressure using ambulatory monitoring in the first 9-months of 2019. The patients were older than 18 years and provided their informed consent for participating in the study. The inpatients were excluded from the study. Their 24-hour blood pressures were recorded using an ambulatory monitoring on routine workdays. The study protocol was approved by the scientific committee of the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. All the participants provided signed informed consent before the study. The time-varying variables of SBP, DBP, and heart rate average were measured hourly based on the 24-hour ambulatory monitoring. The hourly SBP of each patient across 24 hours was considered as the response variable. The variables of age (year), gender, and body mass index (BMI), and history of cigarette smoking were the explanatory variables. The measured time was the official time. The evaluation of biomarkers effects on BP in the alternation of the autonomic nervous system is of interest. Due to the longitudinal structure of the data, conventional analytical methods such a marginal models should be used (18). As mentioned earlier, the effect of hidden variables is not considered in conventional approaches. It is important to apply a model that accounts for fluctuations of BP during the day-night.We handled this issue by using HSMM.

Statistical Analysis

Two models were fitted to the data. In the first scenario, the marginal model using generalized estimating equations (GEE) was fitted to the data. Due to the nonlinearity of the trend changes in blood pressure during the day-night, the polynomial trajectories of time were included in the model. In the second scenario, to account for the effect of hidden states on SPB across day-night, HSMM was fitted to the data. The model is defined as: where y is the value of response variable for subject i at time t; i=1, …, n and t=1, …, T. X is the covariate values at the same situation. β, is the p×1 vector of regression coefficients under hidden state j; j=1, …, J. Furthermore, ε indicates the error term for subject i at time t. Statistical analyses were performed using R freely software version 4.0.2. A program was written for the HSMM and the “geepack” package was used for applying the marginal model. The probability of type I error was considered .05 to evaluate the significance of variables.

Results

The sample included 34 outpatients, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 44.32 (15.67) years, ranging from 18 to 81 years. The majority of patients were female (n=20). More than half of the patients were overweight (n=18), of whom 12 were obese. Among the participants, 6 had the history of cigarette smoking (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of the Outpatients' Participants

VariableLevelFrequency (%)
GenderMale14 (41.18)
Female20 (58.82)
History of cigarette smokingYes6 (17.65)
No28 (82.35)
BMINormal (18.5-25 kg/m2)4 (11.76)
Overweight (25-30 kg/m2)18 (52.94)
Obese (>=30 kg/m2)12 (35.29)
MeanSD
Heart rate71.6312.49
Age (year)44.3215.67
Figure 1 presents the SBP, DBP, and heart rate average across day-night. In the first scenario, marginal model using generalized estimating equations (GEE) was fitted to the data. By applying this approach, only the linear, quadratic, and cubic effects of time were significant. The positive effect of time showed an increasing trend of SBP (p=0.004) during time. However, the negative significant effect of quadratic term of time showed a deceleration in an increasing trend (p<0.001). The significant effect of cubic term of time (p<0.001) revealed the reverse deceleration with increasing time (Table 2).
Fig. 1.
Table 2

Effects of variables on systolic blood pressure (SBP) in marginal model

Variable Coefficient SEp
Intercept115.614.70<0.001
Time2.330.820.004
Time^2-0.300.08<0.001
Time^30.010.00<0.001
Age-0.070.090.394
Male gender-4.874.010.224
History of cigarette smoking0.074.240.987
BMINormal(Ref)-
Overweight6.424.450.150
Obese3.084.730.514
Table 3 represents the results of 2-state HSMM. In State 1, which corresponds to high activity state, all variables except cigarette smoking history had significant effects on SBP. Age was negatively associated with SBP (p=0.001). Males had lower SBP mean than females (p=0.020). The overweight and obese patients had more SBP than healthy participants (p<0.05). In State 2, which corresponds to low activity state, age had a positive effect on SBP (p<0.010). Males had lower SBP average than females (p=0.001). The history of cigarette smoking had positive significant effects on SBP (p=0.029) (Table 3). Figure 2 presents the probability of belonging to each state during 24 hours. These probabilities were obtained using the HSMM. This figure is a good representative of low and high activity states.
Table 3

Effects of variables on systolic blood pressure (SBP) in two-state hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM)

VariableCoefficientSEp
High activity state
Intercept126.594.19<0.001
Age (year)-0.210.070.001
Male gender-4.722.040.020
History of cigarette smoking-0.302.350.897
BMINormal-
Overweight11.602.98<0.001
Obese5.872.740.032
Low activity state
Intercept93.203.94<0.001
Age (year)0.300.07<0.001
Male gender-6.211.850.001
History of cigarette smoking5.022.300.029
BMINormal-
Overweight-0.122.890.967
Obese5.032.650.058
Fig. 2.
Average of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate over day-night The probability of being in each state during day-night

Discussion

In the present study, 2 models were fitted to the data. The results of marginal model showed that the polynomial trajectories of time were significant. This means the trend of SBP is nonlinear during day-night. Moreover, HSMM, with 2 hidden states of low and high activity, was fitted to the data. The findings showed that males had lower SBP than females in both states. The effect of age was positive in low activity state and negative in the other state. Smokers had more SBP than nonsmokers in low activity state. The increasing effect of BMI was seen only in high activity state. The effects of some risk factors, such as BMI and cigarettes smoking, on SBP were assessed in different studies (35 - 38). One of the causes of increased systolic blood pressure (SBP) in aging is due to increased arterial stiffness (38 , 39). Comparison between the marginal and HSMM indicates that HSMM could reveal the significant effect of variables in time-varying conditions. In a Korean study, the factors associated with the prevalence of hypertension were aging and high BMI. However, in different age groups, prevalence, and control of hypertension differed in men and women. They pointed out that the association between gender and prevalence and control of hypertension are unclear (40). A conducted study at the University of Jordan among healthy university students showed that SBP for males was higher than the females (41). In the study, participants were chosen from healthy young people, while in our study the average age of the participants was 44 years. They found that SBP is associated with BMI. Moreover, smokers had higher systolic blood pressure (41). These findings are in line with our results. In recent studies using 24-hour outpatient blood pressure monitoring techniques, it has been found that blood pressure is higher in men than in women in similar ages (42). This is in contrast with our finding, which may be due to lack of age-matching for men and women in the present study. However, a closer look requires further study. The mentioned studies focused on factors affecting hypertension. Based on the literature review, we could not find a study that evaluates the effect of variables in 2 different situations of high and low activity during day-night. As mentioned, the SBP is affected by some unobservable variables. This may be due to biological complexity of humans. Unobserved variables account for some of the variations within and between individuals. More tangible results can be obtained by considering these variables in the model. It is possible to obtain contradictory results in different studies when investigators perform cross-sectional studies for evaluating the effects of risk factors on response. Because some individual characteristics such as heart rate and BP that change over time are affected by unmeasured factors, namely hidden states. For example, the association between smoking and BP in some studies is positive (43, 44) and it is inverse in the others (45 , 46), which may be due to hidden states. The strength of this study was the evaluation of the studied variables on SBP in low and high activity states using only one model. This can be important for clinical decisions because the applied model is able to explore low and high activity states for each person by considering his/her characteristics. Based on the results, the applied model has reasonably separated the 2 different situations of low and high activity states. One limitation of this study was that only the participants who referred to the heart clinic with symptoms of the disease were included in the study. Another limitation was the small sample size. Nonetheless, the small sample size was partially overcome by repeating the measurements in 24 hours. For better identification of the factors affecting blood pressure in low and high activity states, conducting a study for healthy population with a larger sample size can be valuable. Moreover, in this study, people from different age groups were included. Future studies can focus on specific age groups, such as adolescents, young adults, middle-aged people, and the elderly. Furthermore, future studies can be conducted to evaluate the effects of important risk factors on variation of SBP.

Conclusion

Although some individual characteristics such as sex are fixed across time, their effects can be varying across time. The effects of some variables were different on SBP in low and high activity states. The present study revealed that the effects of cigarette smoking, age, and BMI are different in 2 states of low and high activity

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  36 in total

Review 1.  Insights from the study of heart rate variability.

Authors:  P K Stein; R E Kleiger
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 13.739

2.  The analysis of disease biomarker data using a mixed hidden Markov model (Open Access publication).

Authors:  Johann C Detilleux
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Aging, Arterial Stiffness, and Blood Pressure Association in Chinese Adults.

Authors:  Shouling Wu; Cheng Jin; Shanshan Li; Xiaoming Zheng; Xinyuan Zhang; Liufu Cui; Xiang Gao
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Association Between Heart Rate Variability and Home Blood Pressure: The Toon Health Study.

Authors:  Isao Saito; Yasunori Takata; Koutatsu Maruyama; Eri Eguchi; Tadahiro Kato; Ryutaro Shirahama; Kiyohide Tomooka; Ryoichi Kawamura; Madoka Sano; Yasuharu Tabara; Haruhiko Osawa; Takeshi Tanigawa
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Advances in analysis of longitudinal data.

Authors:  Robert D Gibbons; Donald Hedeker; Stephen DuToit
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 18.561

6.  A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of incident hypertension in women.

Authors:  Thomas S Bowman; J Michael Gaziano; Julie E Buring; Howard D Sesso
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  2013 ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recommendations for the diagnosis of adult hypertension, assessment of cardiovascular and other hypertension-associated risk, and attainment of therapeutic goals.

Authors:  Ramón C Hermida; Michael H Smolensky; Diana E Ayala; Francesco Portaluppi
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 8.  Role of leptin in obesity-related hypertension.

Authors:  William G Haynes
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 2.969

9.  Sex differences in the risk profile of hypertension: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Saswata Ghosh; Simantini Mukhopadhyay; Anamitra Barik
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  The association between smoking and blood pressure in men: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Guoju Li; Hailing Wang; Ke Wang; Wenrui Wang; Fen Dong; Yonggang Qian; Haiying Gong; Chunxia Hui; Guodong Xu; Yanlong Li; Li Pan; Biao Zhang; Guangliang Shan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.