Literature DB >> 34956701

Stability and Differences in Empathy Between Men and Women Medical Students: a Panel Design Study.

Baila Elkin1, Eric Martin LaPlant1, Andrew P J Olson2, Claudio Violato1.   

Abstract

PHENOMENON: Empathy is central to the physician-patient relationship, and affects clinical outcomes. There is uncertainty about the stability of empathy in medical students over the course of medical school, as well as differences in empathy between men and women. APPROACH: A panel study design was used to follow first year through fourth year medical students (MS1-4) during the 2018-2019 school year. Empathy was measured using the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI), a self-report scale that separates empathy into a cognitive perspective taking (PT) and affective empathic concern (EC) component.
FINDINGS: A total of 631 (359 women and 272 men) from 970 students (65% response rate) responded to a baseline survey, and a total of 536 students (300 women and 236 men) from 970 students (55% response rate) responded to surveys throughout the year. At baseline, women had significantly higher EC scores than men (p < 0.0001), with no significant PT difference between men and women (p > 0.05). These differences were stable for all MS cohorts. INSIGHTS: Women had self-reported higher affective empathy (EC component) than men, while there were no differences in cognitive empathy (PT component). We discuss these data in the context of defining gender vs. sex, socialized gender stereotypes, and implications for future research. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empathy; Gender; Medical students

Year:  2021        PMID: 34956701      PMCID: PMC8651952          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-021-01373-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  34 in total

1.  An empirical study of decline in empathy in medical school.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Hojat; Salvatore Mangione; Thomas J Nasca; Susan Rattner; James B Erdmann; Joseph S Gonnella; Mike Magee
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Toward a common taxonomy of competency domains for the health professions and competencies for physicians.

Authors:  Robert Englander; Terri Cameron; Adrian J Ballard; Jessica Dodge; Janet Bull; Carol A Aschenbrener
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Empathy and quality of care.

Authors:  Stewart W Mercer; William J Reynolds
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Patient-rated physician empathy and patient satisfaction during pain clinic consultations.

Authors:  Sarah Walsh; Aoife O'Neill; Ailish Hannigan; Dominic Harmon
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Frans Derksen; Jozien Bensing; Antoine Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: an empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy.

Authors:  Stefano Del Canale; Daniel Z Louis; Vittorio Maio; Xiaohong Wang; Giuseppina Rossi; Mohammadreza Hojat; Joseph S Gonnella
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions.

Authors:  Simone G Shamay-Tsoory; Judith Aharon-Peretz; Daniella Perry
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences.

Authors:  Simon Baron-Cohen; Sally Wheelwright
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2004-04

9.  Occupational burnout and empathy influence blood pressure control in primary care physicians.

Authors:  Oriol Yuguero; Josep Ramon Marsal; Montserrat Esquerda; Jorge Soler-González
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Men, women…who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition.

Authors:  Sandra Baez; Daniel Flichtentrei; María Prats; Ricardo Mastandueno; Adolfo M García; Marcelo Cetkovich; Agustín Ibáñez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.