Changrui Jing1, Jing Liu1, Wenxian Yang1, Yongzhong Li1, Yan Ren1, Yuanyuan Cai2. 1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Wuxi NO. 2 People's Hospital Wuxi, Jiangsu, China. 2. Department of Plastic Surgery, Changzhou NO. 2 People's Hospital No. 29, Xinglong Lane, Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical effect of the four-step pouch plastic surgery in ocular plastic surgery. METHODS: Patients with ocular plastic surgery admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to October 2019 were selected as the study subjects. The patients were divided into the observation group (n=41) and the control group (n=43) according to the different surgical modalities received. The traditional skin approach of lower eyelid, and the four-step pouch plastic surgery were used as the control group and observation group, respectively. The operation time, postoperative recovery time of the eye skin, clinical effect, postoperative complications, and satisfaction rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The operation time was compared between the two groups, indicating no significant difference (P > 0.05). The postoperative recovery time of the eye skin was significantly shorter in the observation group than the control group (P < 0.05). The total clinical effective rate (95.12%) was significantly higher in the observation group than that in the control group (79.07%) (P < 0.05). The total incidence of complications (7.32%) was significantly lower in the observation group than that in the control group (25.58%) (P < 0.05). The overall satisfaction rate was significantly higher in the observation group than the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The clinical effect of four-step pouch plastic surgery in ocular plastic surgery is significant. AJTR
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical effect of the four-step pouch plastic surgery in ocular plastic surgery. METHODS: Patients with ocular plastic surgery admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to October 2019 were selected as the study subjects. The patients were divided into the observation group (n=41) and the control group (n=43) according to the different surgical modalities received. The traditional skin approach of lower eyelid, and the four-step pouch plastic surgery were used as the control group and observation group, respectively. The operation time, postoperative recovery time of the eye skin, clinical effect, postoperative complications, and satisfaction rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The operation time was compared between the two groups, indicating no significant difference (P > 0.05). The postoperative recovery time of the eye skin was significantly shorter in the observation group than the control group (P < 0.05). The total clinical effective rate (95.12%) was significantly higher in the observation group than that in the control group (79.07%) (P < 0.05). The total incidence of complications (7.32%) was significantly lower in the observation group than that in the control group (25.58%) (P < 0.05). The overall satisfaction rate was significantly higher in the observation group than the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The clinical effect of four-step pouch plastic surgery in ocular plastic surgery is significant. AJTR