| Literature DB >> 34956295 |
Yongheng Zhang1, Jingyuan He1, Yezi Xiao1, Yingao Zhang1, Yingqin Liu1, Siqing Wan1, Lu Liu1, Yuan Dong1, Huan Liu1, Youben Yu1.
Abstract
Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) constitute a large family of enzymes with a wide range of cellular functions. Recently, plant GSTs have gained a great deal of attention due to their involvement in the detoxification of electrophilic xenobiotics and peroxides under adverse environmental conditions, such as salt, cold, UV-B and drought stress. A previous study reported that a GST gene (CsGSTU8) in tea plant was distinctly induced in response to drought, suggesting this gene plays a critical role in the drought stress response. In this study, by using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter lines, we further demonstrated that CsGSTU8 was upregulated in response to drought stress and exogenous abscisic acid (ABA) treatments. Overexpression of CsGSTU8 in Arabidopsis resulted in enhanced drought tolerance as indicated by the improved scavenging of excess amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) under drought conditions. Furthermore, we found that CsWRKY48 acts as a transcriptional activator and that its expression is induced in response to drought stress and ABA treatment. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs), dual-luciferase (LUC) assays and transient expression assays in tea plant leaves revealed that CsWRKY48 directly binds to the W-box elements in the promoter of CsGSTU8 and activates its expression. Taken together, our results provide additional knowledge of drought stress responses in tea plant.Entities:
Keywords: Camellia sinensis; ROS; WRKY TF; drought stress; glutathione S-transferases (GSTs)
Year: 2021 PMID: 34956295 PMCID: PMC8696008 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.795919
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Characterization of CsGSTU8 from Camellia sinensis. (A) Conserved domain analysis of the CsGSTU8 protein sequence retrieved from the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/). (B) Phylogenetic analysis of CsGSTU8 and GSTU proteins from Arabidopsis. (C) Expression of CsGSTU8 in different tissues. FL (first leaf), TL (third leaf), S (stems), R (root tips). The data are the means ± SDs of three independent experiments. The values not followed by the same letter are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05). (D) Subcellular localization of 35S::CsGSTU8-GFP and 35S::GFP in tobacco cells,. Bar = 20 μm.
FIGURE 2Expression patterns of CsGSTU8 under PEG and ABA treatments. (A) Expression of CsGSTU8 after PEG treatment. (B) Expression of CsGSTU8 under ABA treatment. (C) Construction of CsGSTU8pro::GUS transgenic lines. Hygromycin B was used to screen transgenic Arabidopsis plants. (D) Measurement of the GUS activities in CsGSTU8pro::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis leaves under PEG and ABA treatments. The Data are presented as the means ± SDs of three independent experiments. Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05).
FIGURE 3Overexpression of CsGSTU8 improves drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. (A) Growth phenotypes under control and mannitol conditions in MS media. (B) Measurement of survival rate in MS media. The Data are presented as the means ± SDs of three independent experiments. (C) Growth phenotypes under control and drought stress conditions in the soil. (D) Measurement of relative electrolyte leakage. The Data are the means ± SDs of five independent experiments. The Values not followed by the same letter are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 4Overexpression of CsGSTU8 alleviated ROS and MDA accumulation under drought stress. (A) Histochemical detection of O2– and H2O2 via NBT staining and DAB staining, respectively. (B) Measurement of GST activity under control and drought conditions. (C) Measurement of H2O2 content under control and drought conditions. (D) Measurement of O2– content under control and drought conditions. (E) Measurement of MDA content under control and drought conditions. The Data are presented as the means ± SDs of three independent experiments. Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05).
FIGURE 5CsWRKY48 acts as a transcriptional activator and is expressed in response to drought and ABA treatment. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of CsWRKY48 and its homologs in other plant species. The red line indicates the WRKY DNA-binding domain. (B) Transactivation analysis of CsWRKY48 in yeast. (C) Transcript levels of CsWRKY48 under PEG treatment. (D) Transcript levels of CsWRKY48 under ABA treatment. (E) Subcellular localization of 35S::CsWRKY48-GFP in tobacco cells. Bar = 20 μm. The data are presented as the means ± SDs of three independent experiments. Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05).
FIGURE 6CsWRKY48 binds to the promoter of CsGSTU8 and activates its expression. (A) EMSAs using purified GST and GST-CsWRKY48 proteins incubated together with biotin-labeled probes of W-box core elements (TGAC sequences) presented in CsGSTU8 promoter. -: absence; +: presence. (B) Schematics of the reporter and effector constructs used in the dual-LUC assays. (C) LUC signal detected in tobacco leaves. (D) LUC/REN ratio, as measured by the dual-LUC assays. (E) Transient expression of 35S::CsWRKY48-GFP and 35S::GFP in tea plant leaves. (F) RT-PCR was used to identify the transformation of 35S::CsWRKY48-GFP and 35S::GFP by using specific primers. (G) Expression of CsGSTU8 in transformed tea plant leaves. The data are presented as the means ± SDs of three independent experiments. Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05).