| Literature DB >> 34956194 |
Yunmeng Bai1,2, Meiling Hu1, Zixi Chen1, Jinfen Wei1, Hongli Du1.
Abstract
T-cell exhaustion is one of the main reasons of tumor immune escape. Using single-cell transcriptome data of CD8+ T cells in multiple cancers, we identified different cell types, in which Pre_exhaust and exhausted T cells participated in negative regulation of immune system process. By analyzing the coexpression network patterns and differentially expressed genes of Pre_exhaust, exhausted, and effector T cells, we identified 35 genes related to T-cell exhaustion, whose high GSVA scores were associated with significantly poor prognosis in various cancers. In the differentially expressed genes, RGS1 showed the greatest fold change in Pre_exhaust and exhausted cells of three cancers compared with effector T cells, and high expression of RGS1 was also associated with poor prognosis in various cancers. Additionally, RGS1 protein was upregulated significantly in tumor tissues in the immunohistochemistry verification. Furthermore, RGS1 displayed positive correlation with the 35 genes, especially highly correlated with PDCD1, CTLA4, HAVCR2, and TNFRSF9 in CD8+ T cells and cancer tissues, indicating the important roles of RGS1 in CD8+ T-cell exhaustion. Considering the GTP-hydrolysis activity of RGS1 and significantly high mRNA and protein expression in cancer tissues, we speculated that RGS1 potentially mediate the T-cell retention to lead to the persistent antigen stimulation, resulting in T-cell exhaustion. In conclusion, our findings suggest that RGS1 is a new marker and promoting factor for CD8+ T-cell exhaustion and provide theoretical basis for research and immunotherapy of exhausted cells.Entities:
Keywords: RGS1; T-cell exhaustion; multiple cancers; poor prognosis; single-cell transcriptome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34956194 PMCID: PMC8692249 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.767070
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Clustering of CD8+ T cells in three cancers. (A) UMAP of single cells to visualize cell-type clusters (left), Pseudo-time trajectory graph (middle), and the proportion of different cell types in different sources (right). (B) Heatmap showing marker genes for CD8+ cell types. (C) The top 10 DEGs in each cell type in three cancers. (D) The GO enrichment analysis of different cell types of CD8+ T cells in three cancers.
Figure 2Candidate gene set associated with CD8+ Tex cells. (A) The gene coexpression network modules of CD8+ T cells with correlation coefficient and p-value. (B) The number of genes with differential expression (left) and coexpression (right). (C) The Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves of TCGA patients grouped by the middle expression value of Candidate gene set. The red and blue lines denote higher and lower expression group, respectively. (D) Distinguishing Tex cells from the other CD8+ T cells effectively in different cancers by GSVA score of Candidate gene set.
The logarithm of fold change of Candidate gene set in three cancers.
| CRC | HCC | NSCLC | CRC | HCC | NSCLC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.41 | 1.94 | 1.29 |
| 1.52 | 1.31 | 1.05 |
|
| 1.02 | 0.63 | 0.74 |
| 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.51 |
|
| 1.53 | 1.53 | 1.58 |
| 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.52 |
|
| 2.15 | 1.75 | 2.05 |
| 1.06 | 1.00 | 1.10 |
|
| 0.71 | 0.92 | 0.74 |
| 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.65 |
|
| 0.59 | 0.79 | 1.24 |
| 0.83 | 0.37 | 0.74 |
|
| 0.41 | 0.99 | 0.34 |
| 0.66 | 0.82 | 0.74 |
|
| 0.62 | 0.31 | 0.43 |
| 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.45 |
|
| 0.69 | 0.41 | 0.62 |
| 0.27 | 0.68 | 0.30 |
|
| 0.71 | 0.81 | 1.06 |
| 1.62 | 1.31 | 1.62 |
|
| 1.33 | 0.46 | 1.21 |
| 1.17 | 0.75 | 1.36 |
|
| 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.55 |
| 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.63 |
|
| 0.89 | 0.36 | 1.03 |
| 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.51 |
|
| 1.30 | 1.04 | 0.95 |
| 0.64 | 0.36 | 0.71 |
|
| 0.81 | 0.45 | 1.08 |
| 0.38 | 0.49 | 0.35 |
|
| 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.82 |
| 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.44 |
|
| 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.68 |
| 0.43 | 0.31 | 0.35 |
|
| 0.76 | 0.54 | 0.56 |
Figure 3DEGs in Pre_exhasuted and Tex cells compared with Teff cells. (A) The common upregulated genes in Pre_exhasuted and Tex cells compared with Teff cells. (B) The mRNA expression value of RGS1 in single-cell dataset and TCGA database (C). (D) The Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves of TCGA patients grouped by the middle expression value of RGS1. The red and blue lines denote higher and lower expression group, respectively. (E) Representative IHC images of RGS1 protein in tumor and normal tissues of liver derived from the HPA database and verification experiment (F, scale bar 100 µm, magnification ×20). (G) The protein expression value of RGS1 in hepatocarcinoma and adjacent noncancerous tissues in the IHC verification experiment. **p <= 0.01, ***p <= 0.001, ****p <= 0.0001.
Figure 4The correlation coefficient between RGS1 and Candidate gene set of Tex cells in CD8+ T cells (left) and TCGA database(right).