| Literature DB >> 34955979 |
Jianfei Wu1, Dan Chen2, Zejuan Bian1, Tiantian Shen1, Weinan Zhang1, Wenjing Cai3,4,5.
Abstract
Despite accumulated evidence from previous studies that green creativity is highly emphasized in various industries, limited research has been conducted in the context of public sectors. Drawing on the dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations, this paper aims to propose and sequentially test the relationship between green training and employees' green creativity through green values and green intrinsic motivation. Based on the data collected in Chinese public sectors (N = 464) at two different time points, the results indicate that green training is positively related to green creativity. Moreover, this relationship is sequentially mediated by green values and green intrinsic motivation. The results in our study advance the emergent literature on green human resource management in the public sector for the practical applications of training and creativity in terms of green management.Entities:
Keywords: green creativity; green intrinsic motivation; green training; green values; sequential mediation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34955979 PMCID: PMC8692942 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759548
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1The hypothesized model.
Comparison of measurement models.
| Model | RMSEA | GFI | TLI | CFI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four factors (baseline model): Green training, green values, green intrinsic motivation and green creativity | 575.489 (218) | 0.060 | 0.904 | 0.953 | 0.959 |
| Three factors: Green values and green intrinsic motivation combined | 1572.768 (222) | 0.115 | 0.719 | 0.824 | 0.846 |
| Two factors: Green training, green values and green intrinsic motivation combined | 3206.299 (225) | 0.169 | 0.537 | 0.617 | 0.660 |
| One factor: All variables combined | 5123.279 (229) | 0.215 | 0.420 | 0.383 | 0.442 |
Descriptive statistics and correlations between variables.
| S. No. | Variables | Mean | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Green training | 4.927 | 0.918 | (0.859) | |||
| 2. | Green values | 5.250 | 1.179 | 0.280 | (0.944) | ||
| 3. | Green intrinsic motivation | 5.062 | 0.835 | 0.468 | 0.369 | (0.845) | |
| 4. | Green creativity | 5.037 | 0.977 | 0.243 | 0.540 | 0.388 | (0.943) |
N = 464. The diagonal is the Cronbach’s alpha.
p < 0.001.
Figure 2The results of the sequential model with path coefficients.
Results of sequential mediation analyses (PROCESS Model 6 in SPSS).
| Model 6 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y = Green creativity | ||||||
| X = Green training | ||||||
| M1 = Green values | ||||||
| M2 = Green intrinsic motivation | ||||||
| Covariates: | ||||||
| Age Gender Tenure Education | ||||||
| Sample size: 484 | ||||||
| Outcome: | Green values | |||||
| Model 1: | Summary | |||||
|
| R-sq |
| Df1 | Df2 |
| |
| 0.371 | 0.138 | 14.655 | 5 | 458 | 0.000 | |
| Coefficient | SE |
|
| |||
| Constant | 3.424 | 0.425 | 8.063 | 0.000 | ||
| Green training | 0.290 | 0.058 | 5.036 | 0.000 | ||
| Age | 0.026 | 0.008 | 3.231 | 0.001 | ||
| Gender | 0.153 | 0.103 | 1.485 | 0.138 | ||
| Tenure | −0.004 | 0.028 | −0.135 | 0.892 | ||
| Education | −0.308 | 0.075 | −4.100 | 0.000 | ||
| Outcome: | Green intrinsic motivation | |||||
| Model 2: | Summary | |||||
|
| R-sq |
| Df1 | Df2 |
| |
| 0.547 | 0.299 | 32.536 | 6 | 457 | 0.000 | |
| Coefficient | SE |
|
| |||
| Constant | 1.840 | 0.290 | 6.343 | 0.000 | ||
| Green training | 0.356 | 0.038 | 9.435 | 0.000 | ||
| Green values | 0.169 | 0.030 | 5.641 | 0.000 | ||
| Age | 0.018 | 0.005 | 3.367 | 0.001 | ||
| Gender | 0.016 | 0.066 | 0.245 | 0.807 | ||
| Tenure | −0.012 | 0.018 | −0.689 | 0.491 | ||
| Education | 0.024 | 0.049 | 0.482 | 0.630 | ||
| Outcome: | Green creativity | |||||
| Model 3: | Summary | |||||
|
| R-sq |
| Df1 | Df2 |
| |
| 0.585 | 0.342 | 33.832 | 7 | 456 | 0.000 | |
| Coefficient | SE |
|
| |||
| Constant | 1.689 | 0.344 | 4.917 | 0.000 | ||
| Green training | 0.028 | 0.047 | 0.601 | 0.548 | ||
| Green values | 0.395 | 0.035 | 11.255 | 0.000 | ||
| Green intrinsic motivation | 0.263 | 0.053 | 4.956 | 0.000 | ||
| Age | −0.013 | 0.006 | −2.119 | 0.035 | ||
| Gender | −0.021 | 0.075 | −0.277 | 0.782 | ||
| Tenure | 0.023 | 0.020 | 1.168 | 0.244 | ||
| Education | 0.080 | 0.056 | 1.442 | 0.150 | ||
| Outcome: | Green creativity | |||||
| Model 4: | Summary | |||||
|
| R-sq |
| Df1 | Df2 |
| |
| 0.254 | 0.064 | 6.306 | 5 | 458 | 0.000 | |
| Coefficient | SE |
|
| |||
| Constant | 3.677 | 0.367 | 10.028 | 0.000 | ||
| Green training | 0.249 | 0.050 | 5.017 | 0.000 | ||
| Age | 0.003 | 0.007 | 0.483 | 0.629 | ||
| Gender | 0.051 | 0.090 | 0.570 | 0.569 | ||
| Tenure | 0.019 | 0.024 | 0.779 | 0.436 | ||
| Education | −0.050 | 0.065 | −0.755 | 0.451 | ||
| Total, direct, indirect effects | ||||||
| Total effects of green training on green creativity | ||||||
| Effect | SE |
|
| |||
| 0.249 | 0.050 | 5.017 | 0.000 | |||
| Direct effects of green training on green creativity | ||||||
| Effect | SE |
|
| |||
| 0.028 | 0.047 | 0.601 | 0.548 | |||
| Indirect effects of green training on green creativity | ||||||
| Effect | Boot SE | BootLLCI | BootULCI | |||
| Total: | 0.221 | 0.036 | 0.155 | 0.294 | ||
| Ind 1: | 0.114 | 0.026 | 0.067 | 0.169 | ||
| Ind 2: | 0.094 | 0.023 | 0.052 | 0.143 | ||
| Ind 3: | 0.013 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.026 | ||
| Indirect effect key | ||||||
| Ind 1: | Green training → green values → green creativity | |||||
| Ind 2: | Green training → green intrinsic motivation → green creativity | |||||
| Ind 3: | Green training → green values → green intrinsic motivation → green creativity | |||||
| Analysis notes | ||||||
| Bootstrap samples for bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals: 5,000 | ||||||
| Level of confidence for all confidence intervals in output: 95% | ||||||
| BootLLCI = lower limit confidence interval; BootULCI = upper limit confidence interval | ||||||