| Literature DB >> 34955871 |
Shin-Huei Liu1,2,3, Li-Wei Lo1,2,3, Yu-Hui Chou2, Wei-Lun Lin2, Tsung-Ying Tsai1, Wen-Han Cheng1,2,3, Yenn-Jiang Lin1,2,3, Shih-Lin Chang1,2,3, Yu-Feng Hu1,2,3, Fa-Po Chung1,2,3, Hui-Chun Huang3,4,5, Shih-Ann Chen2,3,6.
Abstract
Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CMP) is associated with altered cardiac electrophysiological (EP) properties, which leads to the risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). We aimed to evaluate the EP properties, autonomic, and structural remodeling in a rabbit model with early liver cirrhosis (LC). Twelve rabbits were assigned to the sham and LC groups. The early-stage LC was induced by the ligation of the common bile duct. All rabbits received an EP study, VA inducibility test, myocardial, and liver histology staining. Western blot analyses of protein expression and tyrosine hydroxylase stain for sympathetic nerves were performed. The effective refractory period the LC group was significantly longer than the sham group [i.e., left ventricle (LV) 205.56 ± 40.30 vs. 131.36 ± 7.94 ms; right ventricle (RV) 206.78 ± 33.07 vs. 136.79 ± 15.15 ms; left atrium (LA) 140.56 ± 28.75 vs. 67.71 ± 14.29 ms; and right atrium (RA) 133.78 ± 40.58 vs. 65.43 ± 19.49 ms, all p < 0.01], respectively. The VA inducibility was elevated in the LC group when compared with the sham group (i.e., 21.53 ± 7.71 vs. 7.76 ± 2.44%, p = 0.013). Sympathetic innervation (102/μm2/mm2) was increased in all cardiac chambers of the LC group compared with the sham group (i.e., LV 9.11 ± 4.86 vs. 0.17 ± 0.15, p < 0.01; RV 4.36 ± 4.95 vs. 0.18 ± 0.12, p = 0.026; LA 6.79 ± 1.02 vs. 0.44 ± 0.20, p = 0.018; and RA 15.18 ± 5.12 vs. 0.10 ± 0.07, p = 0.014), respectively. Early LC is presented with an increased ventricular vulnerability, structural heterogeneity, and sympathetic innervation. Close monitoring for fatal arrhythmias is warranted in patients with early stages of LC.Entities:
Keywords: cardiac electrophysiology; cirrhotic cardiomyopathy; liver cirrhosis; liver sympathetic innervation; ventricular tachycardia (VT)
Year: 2021 PMID: 34955871 PMCID: PMC8692789 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.719883
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Comparison of body weight, blood analysis, echocardiogram, and cardiac electrophysiological parameters between two groups.
| Sham ( | LC ( | ||
| BW (kg) | 2.85 ± 0.17 | 2.25 ± 0.41 | 0.029 |
| T-BIL (mg/dl) | 0.05 ± 0.04 | 7.45 ± 1.61 | <0.001 |
| ALT (U/L) | 25.17 ± 3.31 | 86.00 ± 50.52 | 0.032 |
| AST (U/L) | 19.17 ± 7.70 | 123.83 ± 121.61 | 0.042 |
| CREA (mg/dl) | 0.68 ± 0.11 | 1.32 ± 0.10 | 0.048 |
|
| |||
| LA (mm) | 9.72 ± 1.00 | 9.69 ± 1.07 | 0.644 |
| IVSd (mm) | 2.32 ± 0.21 | 2.29 ± 0.20 | 0.648 |
| IVSs (mm) | 3.11 ± 0.32 | 3.10 ± 0.35 | 0.812 |
| LVIDd (mm) | 16.35 ± 0.07 | 16.29 ± 0.03 | 0.723 |
| LVIDs (mm) | 10.12 ± 0.31 | 10.09 ± 0.27 | 0.901 |
| PWd (mm) | 2.29 ± 0.19 | 2.31 ± 0.16 | 0.651 |
| PWs (mm) | 3.51 ± 0.03 | 3.49 ± 0.06 | 0.911 |
| Mitral E/A | 1.23 ± 0.08 | 1.25 ± 0.04 | 0.887 |
| LVEF (%) | 54.02 ± 8.50 | 43.20 ± 7.30 | 0.011 |
|
| |||
| VA inducibility (%) | 7.76 ± 2.44 | 21.53 ± 7.71 | 0.013 |
| Bipolar DF (Hz) | 8.23 ± 4.41 | 9.20 ± 7.35 | <0.001 |
| Unipolar DF (Hz) | 7.27 ± 2.97 | 7.67 ± 4.47 | 0.007 |
BW, body weight; T-BIL, total bilirubin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate transaminase; CREA, creatinine; LA, left atrium; IVSd, diastolic phase of interventricular septum; IVSs, systolic phase of interventricular septum; LVIDd, diastolic phase of left ventricular internal diameter; LVIDs, systolic phase of left ventricular internal diameter; PWd, diastolic phase of left ventricular posterior wall; PWs, systolic phase of left ventricular posterior wall; mitral E/A, mitral valve early to atrial filling velocity ratio; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; EP, electrophysiology; VA, ventricular arrhythmia; DF, domain frequency.
FIGURE 1The echocardiograms and cardiac electrophysiological study. (A,B) Representative echocardiogram images in the sham group. (C,D) Representative echocardiogram images in the liver cirrhosis (LC) group. (E) Comparison of 2 and 10 times the pacing threshold for effective refractory period (ERP) (ms) in all the cardiac chambers between the sham and LC group. (F) A representative ECG of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) induced by VA inducibility test in the LC group. (G) A representative bipolar electrogram of the ventricle during VA in the LC group. (H) A representative unipolar electrogram of the ventricle during VA in the LC group. (E) Comparison of 2 and 10 times the pacing threshold for effective refractory period (ERP) (ms) in all the cardiac chambers between the sham and LC group. *p < 0.01, compared with the sham group.
FIGURE 2Fibrosis and inflammation quantification of the liver parenchyma. (A) Representative Western blot images of protein expressions of fibrosis and inflammation from the liver. The α-SMA and TGF-β levels in the LC group were significantly higher than in the sham group. The TNF-α level in the LC group was significantly higher than in the sham group. (B) The left panel shows the representative images of multiple CD68-positive staining cells (denoted in black arrowheads) from the liver parenchyma in the LC group, whereas the sham group revealed negative findings. The right panel shows that the number of CD68-positive cells in the LC group was significantly increased than that in the sham group. *p < 0.01, compared with the sham group. α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; β-actin, β-actin; CD68, anti-Cluster of Differentiation 68 antibody; HPF, high-power field; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.
FIGURE 3Masson’s trichrome stain for fibrosis quantification of the myocardium. (A) The Masson’s trichrome stain (magnification 200×) of the atrial and ventricular myocardium in the sham and LC groups. The red color indicates the normal myocardium. The blue color indicates the fibrotic tissue (denoted in black arrowheads). (B) The comparison of percentages of myocardial fibrotic area from Masson’s trichrome stain between the groups. *p < 0.01 compared with the LC group.
FIGURE 4Tyrosine hydroxylase stain for sympathetic innervation of the myocardium. (A) The immunohistochemistry stain (magnification 200×) for tyrosine hydroxylase of the atrial and ventricular myocardium in the sham and LC groups. The tyrosine hydroxylase stain showed an increased sympathetic innervation (denoted in black arrowheads) in the LC group compared with the sham group. (B) The comparison of the total area of sympathetic innervation in the myocardium between the sham and LC groups. **p < 0.01, compared with the sham group. *p < 0.05, compared with the sham group.
FIGURE 5Western blot analyses for protein expressions of the myocardium. (Left) Representative Western blot images of ion channel protein expressions from the left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), left atrium (LA), and right atrium (RA). (Right) The ionic channel protein level of CaV1.2 in the LC group was significantly higher than in the sham group in all cardiac chambers. The ionic channel protein level of SERCA 2 and NCX 1 showed no difference between the two groups in all cardiac chambers. The ionic channel protein level of RyR 2 in the LC group was significantly lower than the sham group in all cardiac chambers. *p < 0.01 compared with the sham group. CaV1.2, voltage-gated L-type Ca2+ channel; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; NCX 1, Na+/Ca2+-exchanger type 1; RyR 2, ryanodine receptor 2; SERCA 2, sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase 2.