Edvard Johansson1, Roope A Kallionpää2, Petri Böckerman3, Sirkku Peltonen4, Juha Peltonen5. 1. Faculty of Social Sciences, Business, and Economics, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland. 2. Institute of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. 3. Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland; Labour Institute for Economic Research, Helsinki, Finland; IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany. 4. Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Dermatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. 5. Institute of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. Electronic address: juhpel@utu.fi.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study investigated whether individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) fare worse than individuals without NF1 in terms of economic well-being. NF1 is relatively common in the population and provides an informative case of a rare hereditary disease. METHODS: We examined a subset of 692 individuals with verified NF1 from the Finnish total population-based NF1 cohort and compared that with 7407 control individuals matched for age, sex, and municipality during 1997-2014. Economic well-being was operationalized with annual work earnings and total income, including social income transfers. RESULTS: NF1 significantly worsened economic well-being. Low education, increased morbidity, and reduced labor market participation partly explained the effect of NF1. Yet, NF1 was independently associated with lower income even after adjusting for these factors. Furthermore, NF1 had a larger negative effect on income from work than it had on total income, which indicated that the Finnish social security system partly compensated the labor market losses suffered by individuals with NF1. NF1 had a larger impact on economic inequality for men than for women. CONCLUSION: NF1 contributes to economic inequality. A hereditary disease may convey worse economic well-being over several generations.
PURPOSE: This study investigated whether individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) fare worse than individuals without NF1 in terms of economic well-being. NF1 is relatively common in the population and provides an informative case of a rare hereditary disease. METHODS: We examined a subset of 692 individuals with verified NF1 from the Finnish total population-based NF1 cohort and compared that with 7407 control individuals matched for age, sex, and municipality during 1997-2014. Economic well-being was operationalized with annual work earnings and total income, including social income transfers. RESULTS: NF1 significantly worsened economic well-being. Low education, increased morbidity, and reduced labor market participation partly explained the effect of NF1. Yet, NF1 was independently associated with lower income even after adjusting for these factors. Furthermore, NF1 had a larger negative effect on income from work than it had on total income, which indicated that the Finnish social security system partly compensated the labor market losses suffered by individuals with NF1. NF1 had a larger impact on economic inequality for men than for women. CONCLUSION: NF1 contributes to economic inequality. A hereditary disease may convey worse economic well-being over several generations.