Literature DB >> 34954868

Clinical Value of Surveillance Biopsies in Pediatric Liver Transplantation.

Brittany Rocque1, Aaron Zaldana1, Carly Weaver2,3, Julia Huang1, Arianna Barbetta1, Victoria Shakhin3, Cameron Goldbeck1, George Yanni3, Shannon Zielsdorf1,2, Yong Kwon1,2, Kambiz Etesami1,2, Yuri Genyk1,2, Shengmei Zhou4, Rohit Kohli3, Juliet Emamaullee1,2.   

Abstract

Although pediatric liver transplantation (LT) results in excellent long-term outcomes, a high incidence of early acute cellular rejection and late graft fibrosis persists. Routine measurement of allograft enzymes may not reliably detect rejection episodes, identify candidates for immunosuppression minimization, or indicate allograft fibrosis. Surveillance biopsies (SBs) can provide valuable information in this regard, but their role in pediatric LT is not fully established. A retrospective cohort of 236 pediatric LT recipients from a high-volume center was studied to characterize the risks and benefits of SB versus for-cause biopsies (FCBs). The study population was 47.1% male and 54.7% Hispanic, and 31% received living donor grafts. Our data suggest that patients in the SB group had better transplant outcomes (rejection-free, graft, and patient survival) compared with patients who had FCBs or who never underwent biopsy. Among 817 biopsies obtained from 236 patients, 150 (18.4%) were SBs. Only 6 patients had a biopsy-related complication, and none were observed in the SB subset. Graft biochemical blood tests did not accurately predict rejection severity on biopsy, with aspartate aminotransferase area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.66, alanine aminotransferase AUROC 0.65 (very poor predictions), and gamma-glutamyltransferase AUROC 0.58 (no prediction). SBs identified subclinical rejection in 18.6% of biopsies, whereas 63.3% of SBs had evidence of fibrosis. SBs prompted changes in immunosuppression including dose reduction. Our experience suggests that SB in pediatric LT is safe, offers valuable information about subclinical rejection episodes, and can guide management of immunosuppression, including minimization. Improved outcomes with SB were likely multifactorial, potentially relating to a more favorable early posttransplant course and possible effect of management optimization through SB. Further multicenter studies are needed to examine the role of SBs on long-term outcomes in pediatric LT.
© 2021 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34954868      PMCID: PMC9078451          DOI: 10.1002/lt.26399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   6.112


  21 in total

Review 1.  The long-term liver graft and protocol biopsy: do we want to look? What will we find?

Authors:  Udeme D Ekong
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 2.  Banff schema for grading liver allograft rejection: an international consensus document.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Use of anti-platelet agents in the prevention of hepatic fibrosis in patients at risk for chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Umair Iqbal; Brittany B Dennis; Andrew A Li; George Cholankeril; Donghee Kim; Muhammad Ali Khan; Aijaz Ahmed
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 6.047

4.  US-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Soma Mandal; Roberto Miraglia; Luigi Maruzzelli; Rosa Liotta; Fabio Tuzzolino; Marco Spada; Silvia Riva; Angelo Luca
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.839

5.  Protocol liver biopsy is the only examination that can detect mid-term graft fibrosis after pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Yukihiro Sanada; Koshi Matsumoto; Taizen Urahashi; Yoshiyuki Ihara; Taiichi Wakiya; Noriki Okada; Naoya Yamada; Yuta Hirata; Koichi Mizuta
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Late allograft fibrosis in pediatric liver transplant recipients: Assessed by histology and transient elastography.

Authors:  Atchariya Chanpong; Napat Angkathunyakul; Pattana Sornmayura; Pornthep Tanpowpong; Chatmanee Lertudomphonwanit; Tanapong Panpikoon; Suporn Treepongkaruna
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2019-07-06

7.  Immunological factors and liver fibrosis in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Małgorzata Markiewicz-Kijewska; Piotr Kaliciński; Przemysław Kluge; Barbara Piątosa; Irena Jankowska; Aneta Rękawek; Ewa Kostecka; Przemysław N Kurowski
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 1.530

Review 8.  What does the long-term liver allograft look like for the pediatric recipient?

Authors:  Stefan Hübscher
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adaptation of Imaging Mass Cytometry to Explore the Single Cell Alloimmune Landscape of Liver Transplant Rejection.

Authors:  Nolan Ung; Cameron Goldbeck; Cassandra Man; Julianne Hoeflich; Ren Sun; Arianna Barbetta; Naim Matasci; Jonathan Katz; Jerry S H Lee; Shefali Chopra; Shahab Asgharzadeh; Mika Warren; Linda Sher; Rohit Kohli; Omid Akbari; Yuri Genyk; Juliet Emamaullee
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 8.786

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.