| Literature DB >> 34952832 |
Aida Bertoli-Avella1, Ronja Hotakainen2, Maryam Al Shehhi3, Alice Urzi2, Catarina Pareira2, Anett Marais2, Khoula Al Shidhani4, Sumaya Aloraimi3, Galina Morales-Torres2, Steffen Fisher2, Laura Demuth2, Laila Abdel Moteleb Selim5, Nihal Al Menabawy5, Maryam Busehail6, Mohammed AlShaikh6, Naser Gilani7, Dler Nooruldeen Chalabi8, Nasser S Alharbi9, Majid Alfadhel10,11, Mohammed Abdelrahman12, Hanka Venselaar13, Nadeem Anjum14, Anjum Saeed14, Malak Ali Alghamdi15, Hamad Aljaedi16, Hisham Arabi17, Vasiliki Karageorgou2, Suliman Khan2, Zahra Hajjari2, Mandy Radefeldt2, Ruslan Al-Ali2, Kornelia Tripolszki2, Amer Jamhawi2, Omid Paknia2, Claudia Cozma2, Huma Cheema14, Najim Ameziane2, Saleh Al-Muhsen12, Peter Bauer2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We sought to describe a disorder clinically mimicking cystic fibrosis (CF) and to elucidate its genetic cause.Entities:
Keywords: RNA-Seq; genetic research; genetics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34952832 PMCID: PMC9554030 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2021-108150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Genet ISSN: 0022-2593 Impact factor: 5.941
Figure 1Summarised family trees of the nine families and the identified AGR2 variants. Variants are colour-coded, the founder missense variant is shown in red font, with the corresponding haplotypes (families 2, 3, 4 and 7). Genotypes are shown below available individuals. AGR2 genotypes show full co-segregation with the phenotype.
Figure 2AGR2 variants identified in the patients and abnormal splicing caused by an intronic variant. (A) The deletion region of AGR2/3 is shown in the Integrative Genome Viewer (IGV). Reads for the exonic regions of the AGR2/3 genes can be seen in the control (lower panel), whereas no reads are seen in the index sample III-1 (deleted region is boxed, chr7:16834456–16918247). This deletion was confirmed by qPCR. (B) Schematic representation of AGR2 gene, with the detected variants shown (font colours match the respective family). (C) Sashimi plots from IGV, illustrating AGR2 splicing junctions. Arcs represents splice junctions and connect the exons, the number of reads split is displayed across the junction. The variant c.330+1del causes aberrant splicing, note the junctions skipping exon 5 (arrow). See also online supplemental figure 2A–C.
Figure 3Structural protein analysis of the missense variants. (A) Dimer of the AGR2 residues 36–175. Monomers are individually coloured in grey or blue. Side chains of the residues are not shown, except for the mutated P71, H117 and G143 in red. (B) Overview of AGR2 as seen from the side; one monomer is shown as grey surface only. This view shows the distance between the mutated residues (red side chains) and the putative active site of the protein CPHS-motif (orange). (C) Variant P71T: The proline side chain is shown in magenta; note the attachment of the side chain to its own backbone; the threonine side chain is shown in yellow. Side chains of the protein are coloured by atom type (carbon=cyan, oxygen=red, nitrogen=blue, sulfur=green). The proline side chain is slightly larger than threonine, but the main differences between these two residues lie in the shape of the side chain and proline tendency to make rigid turns that stabilise the protein structure. (D) Variant H117Y: The histidine side chain is shown in magenta, whereas the tyrosine side chain is yellow. Other atoms are coloured as described. The change from histidine to tyrosine indicates a small difference in size, and a different potential for interactions since histidine’s side chain can be used for electron storage. (E) Variant G143E: The side chain of the mutant residue glutamic acid will not fit in the same space (note that wild-type glycine does not have a side chain). The change in charge and side chain size will affect the local structure and may affect interactions with other proteins.