Jordan Jenrette1, Kerry Schwarz2, Toby Trujillo3, Lance Ray4. 1. Department of Pharmacy, UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA; University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, USA. Electronic address: Jordan.Jenrette@cuanschutz.edu. 2. Department of Pharmacy, UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA; University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, USA. Electronic address: Kerry.Schwarz@uchealth.org. 3. University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, USA; Anticoagulation Services, UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA. Electronic address: Toby.Trujillo@cuanschutz.edu. 4. University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Pharmacy, Denver Health, Denver, CO, USA. Electronic address: Lance.Ray@dhha.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use presents a challenge to all providers involved in emergency care of patients since widely accepted laboratory tests to assess the level of anticoagulation for such medications are lacking. Viscoelastic tests such as thromboelastography (TEG) tests are increasingly used throughout major trauma centers to help guide resuscitation efforts in patients presenting with trauma and/or hemorrhagic shock. OBJECTIVE: The primary outcome compared TEG parameters between emergency department trauma patients reporting DOAC therapy and known normal TEG parameter values. The secondary outcome evaluated patients who reported time of last known DOAC dose within a preferred time frame of <12 h for once daily dosing DOAC therapy or < 6 h for twice daily dosing DOAC therapy. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study assessed TEG values in patients receiving DOAC therapy and compared these to institution TEG ranges considered normal. TEG values of reaction time (R time), kinetics (K), alpha angle (AA), maximum amplitude (MA), and percent lysis in 30 min (LY30) were collected for patients reporting DOAC therapy. RESULTS: 40 patients were included in this study. 19 patients reported apixaban therapy and 21 reported rivaroxaban therapy. 5 (12.5%) patients had an elevated R time and 1 (2.5%) patient had a reduced MA. All other TEG values did not suggest hypocoagulability. For the secondary outcome assessing patients reporting last known dose within the preferred time frame, only the R time was elevated in 2 (14.3%) patients. Lastly, in a subgroup analysis of patients with elevated low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) orAnti- Xa levels, the R time was the only parameter affected in 25% of patients. CONCLUSION: TEG values were typically not affected by rivaroxaban or apixaban use in an emergency department trauma population suggesting that TEG is not sensitive for Xa inhibitor detection and should not be relied upon for assessing anticoagulation in such settings.
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use presents a challenge to all providers involved in emergency care of patients since widely accepted laboratory tests to assess the level of anticoagulation for such medications are lacking. Viscoelastic tests such as thromboelastography (TEG) tests are increasingly used throughout major trauma centers to help guide resuscitation efforts in patients presenting with trauma and/or hemorrhagic shock. OBJECTIVE: The primary outcome compared TEG parameters between emergency department trauma patients reporting DOAC therapy and known normal TEG parameter values. The secondary outcome evaluated patients who reported time of last known DOAC dose within a preferred time frame of <12 h for once daily dosing DOAC therapy or < 6 h for twice daily dosing DOAC therapy. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study assessed TEG values in patients receiving DOAC therapy and compared these to institution TEG ranges considered normal. TEG values of reaction time (R time), kinetics (K), alpha angle (AA), maximum amplitude (MA), and percent lysis in 30 min (LY30) were collected for patients reporting DOAC therapy. RESULTS: 40 patients were included in this study. 19 patients reported apixaban therapy and 21 reported rivaroxaban therapy. 5 (12.5%) patients had an elevated R time and 1 (2.5%) patient had a reduced MA. All other TEG values did not suggest hypocoagulability. For the secondary outcome assessing patients reporting last known dose within the preferred time frame, only the R time was elevated in 2 (14.3%) patients. Lastly, in a subgroup analysis of patients with elevated low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) orAnti- Xa levels, the R time was the only parameter affected in 25% of patients. CONCLUSION: TEG values were typically not affected by rivaroxaban or apixaban use in an emergency department trauma population suggesting that TEG is not sensitive for Xa inhibitor detection and should not be relied upon for assessing anticoagulation in such settings.