Literature DB >> 34951958

Overcoming constraints on the detection of recessive selection in human genes from population frequency data.

Daniel J Balick1, Daniel M Jordan2, Shamil Sunyaev3, Ron Do4.   

Abstract

The identification of genes that evolve under recessive natural selection is a long-standing goal of population genetics research that has important applications to the discovery of genes associated with disease. We found that commonly used methods to evaluate selective constraint at the gene level are highly sensitive to genes under heterozygous selection but ubiquitously fail to detect recessively evolving genes. Additionally, more sophisticated likelihood-based methods designed to detect recessivity similarly lack power for a human gene of realistic length from current population sample sizes. However, extensive simulations suggested that recessive genes may be detectable in aggregate. Here, we offer a method informed by population genetics simulations designed to detect recessive purifying selection in gene sets. Applying this to empirical gene sets produced significant enrichments for strong recessive selection in genes previously inferred to be under recessive selection in a consanguineous cohort and in genes involved in autosomal recessive monogenic disorders.
Copyright © 2021 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  constraint scores; genetic dominance; inference of selection; mode of inheritance; population genetics; recessive human genes; recessive selection; site frequency spectrum

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34951958      PMCID: PMC8764206          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.043


  59 in total

1.  Directional selection and the site-frequency spectrum.

Authors:  C D Bustamante; J Wakeley; S Sawyer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence for diploid selection models with arbitrary dominance.

Authors:  Scott Williamson; Adi Fledel-Alon; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Dominance genetic variation contributes little to the missing heritability for human complex traits.

Authors:  Zhihong Zhu; Andrew Bakshi; Anna A E Vinkhuyzen; Gibran Hemani; Sang Hong Lee; Ilja M Nolte; Jana V van Vliet-Ostaptchouk; Harold Snieder; Tonu Esko; Lili Milani; Reedik Mägi; Andres Metspalu; William G Hill; Bruce S Weir; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher; Jian Yang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Measuring intolerance to mutation in human genetics.

Authors:  Zachary L Fuller; Jeremy J Berg; Hakhamanesh Mostafavi; Guy Sella; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  Mechanisms of Mendelian dominance.

Authors:  R A Veitia; S Caburet; J A Birchler
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Overview of Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines.

Authors:  Steven M Harrison; Leslie G Biesecker; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2019-09

7.  Characterising and predicting haploinsufficiency in the human genome.

Authors:  Ni Huang; Insuk Lee; Edward M Marcotte; Matthew E Hurles
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Genic intolerance to functional variation and the interpretation of personal genomes.

Authors:  Slavé Petrovski; Quanli Wang; Erin L Heinzen; Andrew S Allen; David B Goldstein
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Patterns of genic intolerance of rare copy number variation in 59,898 human exomes.

Authors:  Douglas M Ruderfer; Tymor Hamamsy; Monkol Lek; Konrad J Karczewski; David Kavanagh; Kaitlin E Samocha; Mark J Daly; Daniel G MacArthur; Menachem Fromer; Shaun M Purcell
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Refining the role of de novo protein-truncating variants in neurodevelopmental disorders by using population reference samples.

Authors:  Jack A Kosmicki; Kaitlin E Samocha; Daniel P Howrigan; Stephan J Sanders; Kamil Slowikowski; Monkol Lek; Konrad J Karczewski; David J Cutler; Bernie Devlin; Kathryn Roeder; Joseph D Buxbaum; Benjamin M Neale; Daniel G MacArthur; Dennis P Wall; Elise B Robinson; Mark J Daly
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.