| Literature DB >> 34951057 |
Qimeng Gao1, Robert Davis1, Zachary Fitch1, Michael Mulvihill1, Brian Ezekian1, Paul Schroder1, Robin Schmitz1, Mingqing Song1, Frank Leopardi1, Marianna Ribeiro1, Allison Miller1, Dimitrios Moris1, Brian Shaw1, Kannan Samy1, Keith Reimann2, Kyha Williams1, Bradley Collins1, Allan D Kirk1.
Abstract
Porcine islet xenotransplantation is a viable strategy to treat diabetes. Its translation has been limited by the pre-clinical development of a clinically available immunosuppressive regimen. We tested two clinically relevant induction agents in a non-human primate (NHP) islet xenotransplantation model to compare depletional versus nondepletional induction immunosuppression. Neonatal porcine islets were isolated from GKO or hCD46/GKO transgenic piglets and transplanted via portal vein infusion in diabetic rhesus macaques. Induction therapy consisted of either basiliximab (n = 6) or rhesus-specific anti-thymocyte globulin (rhATG, n = 6), combined with a maintenance regimen using B7 costimulation blockade, tacrolimus with a delayed transition to sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Xenografts were monitored by blood glucose levels and porcine C-peptide measurements. Of the six receiving basiliximab induction, engraftment was achieved in 4 with median graft survival of 14 days. All six receiving rhATG induction engrafted with significantly longer xenograft survival at 40.5 days (P = 0.03). These data suggest that depletional induction provides superior xenograft survival to nondepletional induction, in the setting of a costimulation blockade-based maintenance regimen.Entities:
Keywords: belatacept; islet transplantation; rhesus anti-thymocyte globulin; xenotransplantation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34951057 PMCID: PMC8715890 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12713
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Xenotransplantation ISSN: 0908-665X Impact factor: 3.907