Literature DB >> 3495089

Propofol emulsion for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. A combined technique of general and regional anaesthesia.

P M De Grood, L G Coenen, J van Egmond, L H Booij, J F Crul.   

Abstract

To provide general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation during regional blockades, three dose regimens of propofol emulsion were studied: induction 2 mg kg-1, infusion rate 9 mg kg-1 h-1 (Group 1); induction 2.5 mg kg-1, infusion rate 12 mg kg-1 h-1 (Group 2); induction 2.5 mg kg-1, infusion rate 9 mg kg-1 (Group 3). Each group comprised 10 healthy (ASA class 1 or 2) unpremedicated patients. The induction times measured from the start of injection until counting ceased (+/- 50 s) and until eye-lash reflex disappeared (+/- 80 s) showed no statistical differences between groups. In five patients in Group 1 and one patient in each of Groups 2 and 3 the induction dose was too low for intubation. Pain on injection was seen in 13 cases (mild 6, moderate 6 and severe 1). Cough accompanied by hypersalivation was the most important side-effect. Recovery times varied widely and showed no statistical differences. Answering simple questions was possible after 14 min in Group 1, 23 min in Group 2 and 19 min in Group 3. Apart from a short period of euphoria, recovery was uneventful. There was no tendency to fall asleep again. None of the combinations of induction doses and infusion rates provided good anaesthesia conditions for an acceptable number of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3495089     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1987.tb02554.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  7 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics, induction of anaesthesia and safety characteristics of propofol 6% SAZN vs propofol 1% SAZN and Diprivan-10 after bolus injection.

Authors:  C A Knibbe; H J Voortman; L P Aarts; P F Kuks; R Lange; H J Langemeijer; M Danhof
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Propofol reduces the incidence of emergence agitation in preschool-aged children as well as in school-aged children: a comparison with sevoflurane.

Authors:  Shin Nakayama; Hajime Furukawa; Hiromune Yanai
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Prevention of sevoflurane related emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy: A comparison of dexmedetomidine and propofol.

Authors:  Monaz Abdulrahman Ali; Ashraf Abualhasan Abdellatif
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2013-07

4.  Efficacy of sevoflurane as an adjuvant to propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for attenuating secretions in ocular surgery.

Authors:  Hou-Chuan Lai; Yun-Hsiang Chang; Ren-Chih Huang; Nan-Kai Hung; Chueng-He Lu; Jou-Hsiu Chen; Zhi-Fu Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Relationship between anesthesia and postoperative endophthalmitis: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Hou-Chuan Lai; Wei-Cheng Tseng; Shu-I Pao; Chih-Shung Wong; Ren-Chih Huang; Wei-Hung Chan; Zhi-Fu Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Comparison of effects of propofol and ketofol (Ketamine-Propofol mixture) on emergence agitation in children undergoing tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Saeed Jalili; Ali Esmaeeili; Koorosh Kamali; Vahideh Rashtchi
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 0.927

7.  The effect of propofol on emergence agitation in children receiving sevoflurane for adenotonsillectomy.

Authors:  Cheol Jin Lee; Sang Eun Lee; Min Kyung Oh; Chee Mahn Shin; Young Jae Kim; Young Kyun Choe; Soon Ho Cheong; Kun Moo Lee; Jeong Han Lee; Se Hun Lim; Young Hwan Kim; Kwang Rae Cho
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-08-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.