| Literature DB >> 34950722 |
Ana Gabriela Hernández Toxqui1, Jazmín Ramírez Ramírez1, José Manuel Pino Moreno2, José Moisés Talamantes Gómez3, Sergio C Angeles Campos3, Juan Carlos Ramírez Orejel3.
Abstract
Functional ice creams were developed by adding larvae of the insect Tenebrio molitor mixed with a seed (Salvia hispanica) and a pseudocereal (Chenopodium quinoa) to strawberry-cranberry ice cream. The objective was to increase micronutrients, macronutrients, and antioxidants, thus rendering the product a food complement. Four ice cream formulations were manufactured: the control strawberry-cranberry ice cream and three experimental mixtures, one of them with an addition of Tenebrio larvae (HT) and two others with a combination of Tenebrio larvae, chia (HTC), and quinoa (HTQ). The ice creams were submitted to proximate chemical analysis: mineral, fatty acid, vitamin, and one antioxidant (cyanidin 3 glucoside) determination. The strawberry-cranberry ice cream was used as a control formulation to evaluate if there were significant differences among nutrients, to which a Dunnett test with a critical value of α = 0.05% was applied. The three formulations that were studied showed a significant increase in the analyzed micronutrients and macronutrients compared to the control formulation. We observed increases of up to 62% in lipid content in the HTC formulation, while an increase of 41% in the protein content of the HT formulation was observed. We quantified an increase and enrichment of vitamins and minerals in the manufactured products, so that their nutritional value was significantly enhanced. In the determination of cyanidin 3 glucoside, we found that the formulation to which chia had been added showed an increase of 74% as compared to the control ice cream; this is important because anthocyanins are a group of flavonoids that stand out for their antioxidant and antimutagenic capabilities.Entities:
Keywords: Tenebrio; edible insects; functional foodstuff; larvae; nutritional value
Year: 2021 PMID: 34950722 PMCID: PMC8688395 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.629180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Results of the proximate chemical analyses of the ice cream upon a dry basis (g/100 g of sample).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fat | 11.07 | 14.34 | 12.01 | |
| Protein | 9.36 | 11.36 | 10.95 | |
| Dietary fiber | 15.01 | 13.89 | 15.59 | |
| Reducing carbohydrates | 26.91 | 25.87 | 26.76 | |
| Ash | 1.88 | 2.11 | 2.02 | |
| Carbohydrates | 31.98 ± 0.00 | 22.54 ± 0.00 | 32.67 ± 0.00 |
HCOo, control ice cream; HT, Tenebrio molitor ice cream; HTC, Tenebrio and chia ice cream; HTQ, Tenebrio and quinoa ice cream.
The values in the rows with a different letter indicate that there exists a significant difference among them. Coefficient of variation (CV), known as relative standard deviation (RSD), corresponds to the average value of the three samples processed, that is, less than 3% and with an alpha level of significance equal to 0.05 (α = 0.05). The highest values quantified in each determination made in bold.
Results of the types of fatty acids in each formulation manufactured (g FA/100 g of fresh sample).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.15b ± 0.00 | 2.86b ± 0.00 | 2.37b ± 0.03 | |
|
| 1.21a ± 0.00 | 0.62b ± 0.01 | 0.88b ± 0.00 | |
|
| 0.77b ± 0.02 | 1.37b ± 0.02 | 0.97b ± 0.00 | |
|
| 2.61a ± 0.02 | 2.43b ± 0.01 | 2.16b ± 0.01 | |
|
| 4.36a ± 0.01 | 4.06b ± 0.01 | 3.88b ± 0.03 | |
|
| 0.13 ± 0.00 | — | — | |
|
| 10.75b ± 0.00 | 8.89b ± 0.03 | 10.52b ± 0.1 | |
|
| 0.96b ± 0.00 | 1.35b ± 0.04 | 1.01b ± 0.01 | |
|
| 1.03b ± 0.00 | 1.33b ± 0.02 | 1.39b ± 0.02 | |
|
| 29.29a ± 0.19 | 30.66b ± 0.02 | 31.96b ± 0.51 | |
|
| 1.59a ± 0.02 | 1.41b ± 0.00 | 1.53a ± 0.01 | |
|
| 0.43b ± 0.00 | 0.72b ± 0.01 | 0.61b ± 0.00 | |
|
| 10.60a ± 0.32 | 10.03b ± 0.08 | 10.64a ± 0.12 | |
|
| 22.00a ± 0.17 | 23.61b ± 0.03 | 23.59b ± 0.17 | |
|
| 2.89a ± 0.02 | 3.37b ± 0.01 | ||
|
| — | — | 0.28 ± 0.01 | — |
|
| 0.35a ± 0.00 | 0.06b ± 0.00 | 0.21b ± 0.00 | |
|
| 1.49b ± 0.09 | 2.20b ± 0.01 | 2.22b ± 0.01 | |
|
| 0.09b ± 0.01 | 0.82b ± 0.00 | 0.717b ± 0.00 | |
|
| — | 0.66b ± 0.00 | 0.458b ± 0.00 | |
| Total Lipids | 4.25 | 5.427 |
| 4.943 |
| Saturated | 2.977 | 3.733 |
| 3.337 |
| Unsaturated | 1.275 | 1.694 |
| 1.606 |
| Monounsaturated | 1.137 | 1.508 |
| 1.351 |
| Polyunsaturated | 0.138 | 0.187 |
| 0.255 |
HCOo, control ice cream; HT, Tenebrio molitor ice cream; HTC, Tenebrio and chia ice cream; HTQ, Tenebrio and quinoa ice cream.
The values in the rows with a different letter indicate that there exists a significant difference among them. Coefficient of variation (CV), known as relative standard deviation (RSD), corresponds to the average value of the three samples processed, that is, <3% and with an alpha level of significance equal to 0.05 (α = 0.05).
Saturated Fatty Acid
∑SFA = (C4:0 + C6:0 + C8:0 + C10:0 + C12:0 + C13:0 + C14:0 + C15:0 + C16:0 + C17:0 + C18:0 + C20:0 + C22:0). Unsaturated Fatty Acid classification
∑MUFA = (C14:1 + C16:1 + C18:1 + C20:1 + C22:1). ∑PUFA = (C18:2 + C18:3n6 + C18:3n3). The highest values quantified in each determination made in bold.
Comparative analysis of the nutritional value of ice cream with other foods made from insects and beef at a g/100 g dry basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Flour | 433.00 | 24.20 | 49.00 | 4.50 | 3.20 | a |
|
| Flour | 477.00 | 23.70 | 57.70 | 11.01 | 2.60 | a |
|
| Flour | 410.00 | 12.50 | 20.00 | 54.30 | 8.70 | a |
|
| Cookies | 477 | 25.06 | 26.47 | 34.83 | 3.08 | b |
| Wheat flour | 474.98 | 10.89 | 19.82 | 63.26 | 2.54 | b | |
| HCOo | Ice cream | 388.07 | 9.36 | 11.07 | 62.75 | 1.8 | |
| HT | Ice cream | 407.66 | 11.81 | 14.34 | 57.84 | 2.11 | |
| HTC | Ice cream | 383.75 | 11.36 | 15.55 | 49.59 | 2.24 | |
| HTQ | Ice cream | 389.13 | 10.90 | 12.01 | 59.36 | 2.02 | |
| Beef | 277.00 | 25.60 | 18.70 | c |
a, Ombeni and Munyuli (;
= contains sorghum flour, maize flour, liquid oil, and sugar;
= contains maize flour, liquid oil, and sugar;
= contains sorghum flour maize flour, oil, sugar, and salt; and
= contains 50% wheat flour and 50% R. phoenicis.
Profiles of minerals and vitamins quantified in the manufactured formulations.
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Calcium | 254.70 | 265.42b ± 0.60 | 239.05b ± 1.58 | |
| Phosphorus | 156.36a ± 4.39 | 185.07b ± 4.34 | 198.98b ± 2.06 | |
| Sodium | 202.04a ± 8.14 | 215.27a ± 3.14 | 188.66a ± 4.99 | |
| Potassium | 337.93a ± 8.43 | 403.97b ± 1.57 | 365.43b ± 6.99 | |
| Magnesium | 23.92a ± 0.83 | 32.11b ± 0.89 | 42.07b ± 0.77 | |
| Iron | 1.05a ± 0.07 | 1.15a ± 0.07 | 1.58b ± 0.06 | 2.23b ± 0.12 |
|
| ||||
| A, retinol | 0.97a ± 0.01 | 1.04b ± 0.01 | 1.50b ± 0.00 | |
| D, calciferol (μg/100 g) | 479.74a ± 8.87 | 584.34b ± 11.5 | 679.30b ± 14.9 | |
| E, α-tocopherol | 4.87a ± 0.09 | 5.93b ± 0.08 | 6.34b ± 0.10 | |
| K, phylloquinone (μg/100 g) | N/D | N/D | 554.75b ± 24.3 | |
|
| ||||
| Thiamine, B1 | 21.53a ± 0.20 | 22.60b ± 0.61 | 25.03b ± 0.12 | |
| Riboflavin, B2 | 30.58a ± 0.14 | 33.74b ± 0.02 | 33.35b ± 0.32 | |
| Niacin, B3 | 74.55a ± 1.07 | 86.69b ± 0.42 | 90.10b ± 0.92 | |
| Folic acid, B9 | 17.50a ± 0.1 | 36.82b ± 0.58 | 38.73b ± 0.58 | |
| Cobalamin, B12 | 4.35a ± 0.02 | 4.26b ± 0.01 | 4.17b ± 0.01 | |
HCOo, control ice cream; HT, Tenebrio molitor ice cream; HTC, Tenebrio and chia ice cream; HTQ, Tenebrio and quinoa ice cream; N/D, not determined.
The values in the rows with a different letter indicate that there exists a significant difference among them. Coefficient of variation (CV), known as relative standard deviation (RSD), corresponds to the average value of the three samples processed, that is, <3% and with an alpha level of significance equal to 0.05 (α = 0.05). The highest values quantified in each determination made in bold.
Composition of the four formulations (%).
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ice cream base | 40.0 | 31.5 | 21.5 | 21.5 |
| Strawberry | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 |
| Cranberry | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 |
| – | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 | |
| Chia | – | – | 10.0 | – |
| Quinoa | – | – | – | 10.0 |
The components of the control ice cream are the following: water, powdered whole milk, sugar, carob bean gum, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), carrageenan gum, strawberry, and cranberry in 1 kg.
Cyanidin chloride concentration upon a dry basis of the formulations.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Control ice cream HCOo | 33.39a ± 0.00 |
| 36.04b ± 0.00 | |
| 42.35b ± 0.00 | |
| 31.57b ± 0.00 |
*HCOo, control ice cream; HT, Tenebrio molitor ice cream; HTC, Tenebrio and chia ice cream; and HTQ, Tenebrio and quinoa ice cream. *The values in the rows with a different letter indicate that there exists a significant difference among them. Coefficient of variation (CV), known as relative standard deviation (RSD), corresponds to the average value of the three samples processed, that is, <3% and with an alpha level of significance equal to 0.05 (α = 0.05).
Figure 1Cyanidin chloride calibration curve.