| Literature DB >> 34950438 |
Lan Hu1, Dongdong Han2, Diao Yu3, Dongji Ao1, Zhengyi Yang1.
Abstract
To explore the role of circulating blood miR-155 and miR-21 in promoting acute pancreatitis (AP) and evaluating the risk stratification of pancreatitis. In this experiment, 70 patients with AP treated in our hospital from October 2019 to December 2020 were included in the research group (RG), and the blood of 52 healthy cases was collected and they were included in the control group (CG). The expression of miR-155 and miR-21 in circulating blood was observed in the two groups. The diagnostic efficacy of miR-155 and miR-21 in AP was observed. The risk factors of patients with AP were observed. The expression of serum gastrointestinal hormones was observed in the two groups. The GAS and VIP in RG were higher than those in CG, while MTL and CCK were lower than those in CG. Moreover, the detection level of mild, moderate, severe, and critical patients was also significantly different (P < 0.05). The expression of miR-155 and miR-21 in circulating blood of RG was significantly lower than that of CG (P < 0.05), and the area under the miR-155 curve was 0.775 and the area under the miR-21 curve was 0.832. Alcoholism, GAS, VIP, MTL, CCK, miR-155, and miR-21 were the risk factors of patients. miR-155 and miR-21 show low expression in the serum of patients. The lower the expression, the more serious the disease. They are closely related to the development of AP. miR-155 and miR-21 have good diagnostic efficacy by ROC analysis, and they are expected to become effective indicators for the diagnosis and treatment of AP in the future.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34950438 PMCID: PMC8692001 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2064162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Primer sequence.
| Upstream sequence | Downstream sequence | |
|---|---|---|
| U6 | 5'-ATTGGAACGATACAGAGAAGATT-3' | 5'-GGAACGCTTCACGAATTTG-3' |
| miR-155 | 5'-GTCCGCTGGCAGTGTCTTAGCTGGTTGT-3'′ | 5'-GTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTC-3' |
| miR-21 | 5'-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3' | 5'-TGGTGTCGTGGAGTCG-3' |
Basic clinical data (n (%)).
| RG ( | CG ( |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age/years | 46.6 ± 4.3 | 46.2 ± 4.7 | 0.488 | 0.626 |
| BMI | 22.26 ± 0.37 | 22.21 ± 0.25 | 0.842 | 0.402 |
|
| ||||
| Gender | 0.271 | 0.603 | ||
| Male | 41 (58.57) | 28 (53.85) | ||
| Female | 29 (41.43) | 24 (46.15) | ||
|
| ||||
| Smoking history | 0.400 | 0.527 | ||
| Yes | 37 (61.67) | 29 (55.77) | ||
| No | 23 (38.33) | 23 (44.23) | ||
|
| ||||
| Drinking history | 0.915 | 0.339 | ||
| Yes | 33 (47.14) | 20 (38.46) | ||
| No | 37 (52.86) | 32 (61.54) | ||
|
| ||||
| Exercise habit | 1.111 | 0.292 | ||
| Yes | 35 (50.00) | 31 (59.62) | ||
| No | 35 (50.00) | 21 (40.38) | ||
|
| ||||
| Marital status | 0.109 | 0.742 | ||
| Married | 68 (97.14) | 51 (98.08) | ||
| Unmarried | 2 (2.86) | 1 (1.92) | ||
|
| ||||
| Place of residence | 0.070 | 0.791 | ||
| City | 36 (51.43) | 28 (53.85) | ||
| Rural | 34 (48.57) | 24 (46.15) | ||
Comparison of serum gastrointestinal hormones between the two groups.
| Groups | Cases | GAS ( | VIP ( | MTL (pg/ml) | CCK (pg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG | 52 | 94.24 ± 11.31a | 2.80 ± 0.34a | 340.23 ± 26.76a | 196.25 ± 17.80a |
| Mild | 17 | 102.46 ± 12.63 | 3.07 ± 0.47 | 332.15 ± 25.86 | 188.37 ± 16.35 |
| Moderate | 20 | 127.84 ± 13.79 | 5.25 ± 0.64 | 281.27 ± 22.74 | 160.26 ± 15.19 |
| Severe | 18 | 157.87 ± 16.10 | 7.42 ± 0.95 | 186.96 ± 19.86 | 122.73 ± 13.24 |
| Critical | 15 | 182.94 ± 19.33 | 9.97 ± 1.17 | 138.98 ± 15.20 | 96.64 ± 10.27 |
Note: compared with the degree of illness, P < 0.05; pairwise comparison of disease severity, all P < 0.05.
Figure 1Expression level of serum gastrointestinal hormones. (a) Expression level of GAS. (b) Expression level of VIP. (c) Expression level of MTL. (d) Expression level of CCK. Note: the symbol indicates that there is a difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).
Figure 2Expression of circulating blood miR-155 and miR-21 in the two groups. (a) The expression of miR-155 in RG was significantly lower than that in CG. (b) The expression of miR-21 in RG was significantly lower than that in CG. Note: the symbol indicates that there is a difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).
ROC curve.
| miR-155 | miR-21 | |
|---|---|---|
| AUC | 0.775 | 0.832 |
| Std. error | 0.046 | 0.037 |
| 95% CI | 0.685∼0.865 | 0.760∼0.904 |
| P | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Cutoff | 0.780 | 0.931 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 67.31 | 86.42 |
| Specificity (%) | 78.57 | 71.43 |
Figure 3Diagnostic efficacy of miR-155 and miR-21 in AP. (a) When the cutoff value was 0.780, the sensitivity and specificity of miR-155 were 67.31% and 78.57%, respectively. (b) When the cutoff value was 0.931, the sensitivity and specificity of miR-21 were 86.42% and 71.43%, respectively.
Univariate analysis (n (%)).
| Clinicopathological features | Mild and moderate ( | Severe and critical ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age/years | 0.368 | 0.607 | ||
| <30 | 12(32.43) | 13(39.39) | ||
| ≥30 | 25(67.57) | 20(60.61) | ||
|
| ||||
| Gender | 1.496 | 0.221 | ||
| Male | 23(62.16) | 25(75.76) | ||
| Female | 14(37.84) | 8(24.24) | ||
|
| ||||
| Alcoholism | 18.500 | 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 31(83.78) | 11(33.33) | ||
| No | 6(16.22) | 22(66.67) | ||
|
| ||||
| GAS ( | 115.62 ± 12.35 | 173.21 ± 17.32 | 16.150 | 0.001 |
| VIP ( | 4.27 ± 0.52 | 8.63 ± 0.96 | 23.980 | 0.001 |
| MTL (pg/ml) | 295.33 ± 24.53 | 179.42 ± 17.59 | 22.740 | 0.001 |
| CCK (pg/ml) | 175.21 ± 15.31 | 112.73 ± 11.84 | 18.930 | 0.001 |
| miR-155 | 1.53 ± 0.67 | 0.55 ± 0.51 | 6.821 | 0.001 |
| miR-21 | 1.69 ± 0.72 | 0.83 ± 0.61 | 5.357 | 0.001 |
Assignment table.
| Factors | Assignment |
|---|---|
| Alcoholism | Yes = 1, no = 0 |
| GAS ( | Data belonged to continuous variables and were analyzed by original data |
| VIP ( | Data belonged to continuous variables and were analyzed by original data |
| MTL (pg/ml) | Data belonged to continuous variables and were analyzed by original data |
| CCK (pg/ml) | Data belonged to continuous variables and were analyzed by original data |
| miR-155 | Data belonged to continuous variables and were analyzed by original data |
| miR-21 | Data belonged to continuous variables and were analyzed by original data |
Multivariate logistic regression analysis.
| Factors | B | SE | Wals | Sig. | Exp (B) | 95% CI of Exp (B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||||
| Alcoholism | 0.608 | 0.280 | 4.709 | 0.030 | 3.521 | 1.061 | 3.183 |
| GAS ( | 0.958 | 0.288 | 11.056 | 0.001 | 5.020 | 0.218 | 0.675 |
| VIP ( | 0.568 | 0.742 | 4.996 | 0.026 | 3.227 | 1.072 | 2.901 |
| MTL (pg/ml) | 0.721 | 0.239 | 5.705 | 0.002 | 4.019 | 1.467 | 4.218 |
| CCK (pg/ml) | 0.856 | 0.423 | 5.512 | 0.031 | 4.629 | 1.353 | 5.727 |
| miR-155 | 0.618 | 0.359 | 24.14 | 0.001 | 6.786 | 0.824 | 19.856 |
| miR-21 | 0.875 | 0.464 | 9.473 | 0.001 | 2.664 | 1.347 | 8.783 |