AIM: Catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter carries a risk of thromboembolism and major bleeding. In light of recent prospective trial data on the safety and efficacy of uninterrupted edoxaban in patients undergoing AF/flutter ablation, real-world Data was aimed for validation. METHODS: A total of 228 patients who underwent AF/atrial flutter ablation over 14 months at our centre were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received uninterrupted oral anticoagulation for at least 4 weeks prior to ablation and 3 months post-ablation. Both bleeding and thromboembolic events were assessed at 24 hours comparing patients on warfarin, rivaroxaban and edoxaban. RESULTS: Mean age of patients were 68.5 +/- 8 years in the warfarin group ( N =86), 63.4 +/- 10.6 years; in the edoxaban group ( N =63) and 62.3 +/- 11.6 years in the rivaroxaban group ( N =79). CHADSVASc scores were 2.43 +/- 1.34, 1.68 +/- 1.34 and 1.64 +/- 1.38 respectively. The mean left atrial sizes were 42.7 +/- 6.8 mm, 42.0 +/- 6 mm and 41.1 +/- 6.5 mm respectively. The study endpoint was death, acute thromboembolism or major bleeding. There was 1 pericardial effusion (1.2%) in the warfarin group, 1 pericardial effusion and 1 transient ischaemic attack (2.5%) in the rivaroxaban group and 1 pericardial effusion needing drainage (1.6%) in the edoxaban group. There were no significant differences in the study endpoints between groups. CONCLUSION: This real-world study demonstrated no significant difference in safety and efficacy between uninterrupted edoxaban, warfarin and rivaroxaban in patients undergoing AF/flutter ablation.
AIM: Catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter carries a risk of thromboembolism and major bleeding. In light of recent prospective trial data on the safety and efficacy of uninterrupted edoxaban in patients undergoing AF/flutter ablation, real-world Data was aimed for validation. METHODS: A total of 228 patients who underwent AF/atrial flutter ablation over 14 months at our centre were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received uninterrupted oral anticoagulation for at least 4 weeks prior to ablation and 3 months post-ablation. Both bleeding and thromboembolic events were assessed at 24 hours comparing patients on warfarin, rivaroxaban and edoxaban. RESULTS: Mean age of patients were 68.5 +/- 8 years in the warfarin group ( N =86), 63.4 +/- 10.6 years; in the edoxaban group ( N =63) and 62.3 +/- 11.6 years in the rivaroxaban group ( N =79). CHADSVASc scores were 2.43 +/- 1.34, 1.68 +/- 1.34 and 1.64 +/- 1.38 respectively. The mean left atrial sizes were 42.7 +/- 6.8 mm, 42.0 +/- 6 mm and 41.1 +/- 6.5 mm respectively. The study endpoint was death, acute thromboembolism or major bleeding. There was 1 pericardial effusion (1.2%) in the warfarin group, 1 pericardial effusion and 1 transient ischaemic attack (2.5%) in the rivaroxaban group and 1 pericardial effusion needing drainage (1.6%) in the edoxaban group. There were no significant differences in the study endpoints between groups. CONCLUSION: This real-world study demonstrated no significant difference in safety and efficacy between uninterrupted edoxaban, warfarin and rivaroxaban in patients undergoing AF/flutter ablation.
Authors: Kevin Phan; Nelson Wang; Laurent Pison; Narendra Kumar; Kerry Hitos; Stuart P Thomas Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Christian Sticherling; Francisco Marin; David Birnie; Giuseppe Boriani; Hugh Calkins; Gheorghe-Andrei Dan; Michele Gulizia; Sigrun Halvorsen; Gerhard Hindricks; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Angel Moya; Tatjana Potpara; Vanessa Roldan; Roland Tilz; Gregory Y H Lip Journal: Europace Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Kevin Phan; Nelson Wang; Laurent Pison; Narendra Kumar; Kerry Hitos; Stuart P Thomas Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Stephan Willems; Edward P Gerstenfeld; Atul Verma; Richard Schilling; Stefan H Hohnloser; Ken Okumura; Harvey Serota; Matias Nordaby; Kelly Guiver; Branislav Biss; Marc A Brouwer; Massimo Grimaldi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-03-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Narendra Kumar; Pietro Bonizzi; Laurent Pison; Kevin Phan; Theo Lankveld; Bart Maesen; Bart Maessen; Mark La Meir; Sandro Gelsomino; Jos Maessen; Harry Crijns Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Paulus Kirchhof; Karl Georg Haeusler; Benjamin Blank; Joseph De Bono; David Callans; Arif Elvan; Thomas Fetsch; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Philip Gentlesk; Massimo Grimaldi; Jim Hansen; Gerhard Hindricks; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Tyler Massaro; Lluis Mont; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Georg Nölker; Jonathan P Piccini; Tom De Potter; Daniel Scherr; Ulrich Schotten; Sakis Themistoclakis; Derick Todd; Johan Vijgen; Luigi Di Biase Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 29.983