| Literature DB >> 34950034 |
Jawaria Iltaf1, Sobia Noreen1, Muhammad Fayyaz Ur Rehman1, Shazia Akram Ghumman2, Fozia Batool1, Muhammad Mehdi1, Sara Hasan1, Bushra Ijaz3, Muhammad Safwan Akram4, Haider Butt5.
Abstract
The screening of hair follicles, dermal papilla cells, and keratinocytes through in vitro, in vivo, and histology has previously been reported to combat alopecia. Ficus benghalensis has been used conventionally to cure skin and hair disorders, although its effect on 5α-reductase II is still unknown. Currently, we aim to analyze the phytotherapeutic impact of F. benghalensis leaf extracts (FBLEs) for promoting hair growth in rabbits along with in vitro inhibition of the steroid isozyme 5α-reductase II. The inhibition of 5α-reductase II by FBLEs was assessed by RP-HPLC, using the NADPH cofactor as the reaction initiator and Minoxin (5%) as a positive control. In silico studies were performed using AutoDock Vina to visualize the interaction between 5α-reductase II and the reported phytoconstituents present in FBLEs. Hair growth in female albino rabbits was investigated by applying an oral dose of the FBLE formulation and control drug to the skin once a day. The skin tissues were examined by histology to see hair follicles. Further, FAAS, FTIR, and antioxidants were performed to check the trace elements and secondary metabolites in the FBLEs. The results of RP-HPLC and the binding energies showed that FBLEs reduced the catalytic activity of 5α-reductase II and improved cell proliferation in rabbits. The statistical analysis (p < 0.05 or 0.01) and percentage inhibition (>70%) suggested that hydroalcoholic FBLE has more potential in increasing hair growth by elongating hair follicle's anagen phase. FAAS, FTIR, and antioxidant experiments revealed sufficient concentrations of Zn, Cu, K, and Fe, together with the presence of polyphenols and scavenging activity in FBLE. Overall, we found that FBLEs are potent in stimulating hair follicle maturation by reducing the 5α-reductase II action, so they may serve as a principal choice in de novo drug designing to treat hair loss.Entities:
Keywords: 5α-reductase; Ficus benghalensis; Minoxin; RP-HPLC; androgenic alopecia; dihydrotestosterone
Year: 2021 PMID: 34950034 PMCID: PMC8688993 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.774583
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Composition of RMs for in vitro enzyme activity assay.
| Sr.no | Reagents | Standard (µL) | IS (µL) | PC (µL) | 1–3 (µL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FBLEs |
|
|
| 200 |
| 2 | SPB |
|
|
|
|
| 3 | 10% alc. testoviron |
|
| 150 | 150 |
| 4 | Crude enzyme |
|
|
|
|
| 5 | NADPH |
| 200 | 200 | 200 |
| 6 | Testosterone enanthate | 10 |
|
|
|
| 7 | Minoxin® (5%) |
|
| 200 |
|
FIGURE 5Characterization of FBLEs and RP-HPLC analysis. In (A), FTIR fingerprints show the functional groups; (B) presence of essential minerals in dried leaves; (C) depicts antioxidants present in FBLEs. Values are mean ± SD. (D) demonstrates how much FBLEs are active in limiting SRD5AII activity. The peak (B) in RP-HPLC graphs indicates the availability of testosterone in RMs; the same peak is represented by (A) in the graph labeled as “IS”.
Peak area ratio (r) and percentage inhibition of SRD5AII by RMs.
| Peak | Area (mm2) | Ratio | % inhibition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | 330 | 2.5 | − |
| IS | 132.6 | 1.0 | − |
| Minoxin 5% | 233.3 | 1.76 | 50.6 |
| PE 1 | 225.5 | 1.7 | 46.6 |
| PE 2 | 215.1 | 1.62 | 41.3 |
| PE 3 | 274.5 | 2.07 | 71.3 |
FIGURE 1Molecular docking of SD5ARII with the ligands. (A)–(–Gallocatechin); (B) Rhein; (C) Mucusasoide, and (D) Minoxidil.
Docking of bioactive compounds reported in Ficus benghalensis leaf extracts.
| Ligands | Docking score (kcal/mol) | Residues | Interaction |
|---|---|---|---|
| (-)- Gallo catechin | −6.9 | NDX A:602 | Conventional H-bond |
| PHE A:114 | Conventional H-bond and Pi–Pi T shaped | ||
| ARG A:114 | Pi-alkyl | ||
| LEU A:17 | Pi-alkyl | ||
| ALA A:117 | Pi-alkyl and C–H bond | ||
| Rhein (1,8-OH,3-COOH) | −7.4 | ALA A:117 | Amide-Pi-stacked |
| GLY A:121 | Amide-Pi-stacked | ||
| LEU A:125 | Pi-alkyl | ||
| Mucusoside | −4.5 | GLY A:32 | Conventional H-bond |
| THR A:37 | Conventional H-bond | ||
| PHE A:223 | Pi-sigma and alkyl | ||
| HIS A:36 | C–H bond | ||
| ILE A:110 | Alkyl | ||
| LEU A:110 | Alkyl | ||
| PRO A:108 | Alkyl | ||
| PRO A:30 | Alkyl | ||
| NDX A:602 | Alkyl | ||
| VAL A:27 | Alkyl | ||
| ARG A:227 | Alkyl | ||
| LUE A:26 | Alkyl | ||
| Minoxidil | −6.0 | GLY A:13 | C–H bond |
| LEU A:125 | Pi-alkyl | ||
| LEU A:17 | Pi-alkyl | ||
| PHE A:118 | Pi-alkyl |
FIGURE 2In vivo hair growth progress after 28 days of treatment.
FIGURE 3Improvement in hair growth within due time shows the weekly increase in hair length. Mean ± SD * Significant at p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
FIGURE 4Photomicrographs of the longitudinal section of skin biopsies under digital microscope × 10 resolution; PC (Minoxin 5%) and crude FBLE extracts depict HF= Hair Follicle, anagen (A), and C= catagen (B).
Preliminary phytochemical screening of extracts of Ficus benghalensis.
| Phytochemicals | Phytochemical tests | Observation | (Pet. ether) | (EtOAc) | (EtOH) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proteins | 1) Ninhydrin test | Blue/violet color/ppt | +++ | ++ | − |
| 2) Biuret test | +++ | ++ | + | ||
| Carbohydrates | 1) Fehling’s test | Brick red ppt | + | ++ | +++ |
| 2) Benedict’s test | + | ++ | +++ | ||
| Alkaloids | Wagner’s test | Reddish-brown | + | + | ++ |
| Saponins | Foam test | Foam on surface | +++ | + | − |
| Phenols and tannins | Ferric chloride test | Bluish-green | + | + | + |
| Terpenoids and steroids | Salkowski test | Reddish-brown | ++ | + | +++ |
| Glycosides | A) Keller–Kilani test | Brown ring/reddish-brown | ++ | + | +++ |
| B) Salkowski test | ++ | + | +++ | ||
| Anthocyanins | Hydrochloric acid test | Blue color | ++ | + | + |
| Quinones | Sulfuric acid test | Red color | + | + | + |
| Flavonoids and coumarins | Sodium hydroxide test | Yellow color | + | + | ++ |
+Slightly present, ++ present, +++ strongly present, − absent.
DPPH radical scavenging and antioxidant capacity of FBLEs.
| Plants extracts | TPC (mg GAE/g) | TFC (mg CE/g) | % RSA | IC50 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBLE (PE) | 23.1 ± 0.33*** | 70.2 ± 0.72*** | 75.8 ± 0.01 | 2.57 ± 0.05 |
| FBLE (EtOAc) | 19.4 ± 0.60*** | 94.4 ± 0.51*** | 60.3 ± 0.01 | 14.1 ± 0.01 |
| FBLE (aq. EtOH) | 21.1 ± 0.79*** | 38.9 ± 0.36*** | 77.5 ± 0.01 | 18.9 ± 0.01 |
Values are mean ± SD; n = 3; ***significant at p < 0.001 applying the Tukey test.