| Literature DB >> 34949986 |
Anfeng Xiang1,2, Meiyu Chen1, Chuan Qin1, Jun Rong3, Can Wang1, Xueyong Shen1, Sheng Liu1.
Abstract
Objective: Recent advances in brain imaging have deepened our knowledge of the neural activity in distinct brain areas associated with acupuncture analgesia. However, there has not been conclusive research into the frequency-specific resting-state functional changes associated with acupuncture analgesia in patients with chronic pain. Here, we aimed to characterize changes across multiple frequencies of resting-state cortical activity associated with ankle acupuncture stimulation (AAS) in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and healthy controls.Entities:
Keywords: ankle acupuncture stimulation; cerebellum; immediate analgesia; insular; resting-state brain activity
Year: 2021 PMID: 34949986 PMCID: PMC8688988 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.786490
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
FIGURE 1AAS was performed at the left lower 5th AAS zone. (A) The acupuncturist inserted the needle into the skin at an angle of about 30°. The needle was angled horizontally into the subcutaneous layer and inserted toward the direction of the knee about 35 mm; (B) the needle insertion point (three-finger widths above the lateral malleolus, near the posterior edge of the fibula and adjacent tendons); (C) the locations of needle stimulation were taped with medical adhesive tape.
FIGURE 2fMRI scanning paradigm. The order of TSA and AAS runs was pseudo-randomized across subjects. After TAS or AAS stimulation run (needles withdrawal), rest runs were conducted. During rest runs, subjects were asked to lie quietly, keep their eyes closed and stay awake. The TSA and AAS portions of the scan session were separated by functional and structure image scan lasting 15 min.
Characteristics of included participants.
| Group | ||||
| Healthy control | Patient | |||
| Gender (M/F) | 11/8 | 12/7 | 0.11 | 0.74 |
| Age (years) | 38.95 ± 15.45 | 46.61 ± 7.35 | 1.66 | 0.11 |
| Weight (kg) | 66.18 ± 10.18 | 64.05 ± 5.63 | 0.80 | 0.43 |
| Height (cm) | 168.10 ± 7.33 | 165.40 ± 7.86 | 1.11 | 0.27 |
| Pain duration | – | 9.00 ± 7.72 | – | – |
FIGURE 3Whole-brain parameter maps showing the main ALFF effects (AAS-TSA).
The ALFF results of main effects (AAS-TSA).
| Band | Area | BA | Cluster size | MNI coordinate | |||
| x | y | Z | |||||
| Norm-1 | mPFC | 10‵ 11 | 1,222 | 4.99 | –6 | 54 | –21 |
| Cerebellum, PCC, parahippocampus | 27‵ 30 | 655 | –5.48 | 3 | –39 | –15 | |
| Right insula | 13 | 421 | –5.31 | 39 | –6 | 21 | |
| Norm-2 | mPFC | 10‵ 11 | 1,199 | 5.21 | –6 | 54 | –21 |
| Right superior temporal gyrus | 38 | 231 | 4.88 | 60 | 9 | –6 | |
| Cerebellum, PCC, parahippocampus | 27‵ 30 | 572 | –5.71 | 3 | –39 | –15 | |
| Right insula, precentral gyrus, postcentral gyrus, amygdala | 13‵ 6‵ 24 | 346 | –5.35 | 39 | –6 | 21 | |
| Slow-5 | mPFC | 10‵ 11 | 1,009 | 5.06 | –30 | 66 | 0 |
| Cerebellum, PCC, parahippocampus | 27‵ 30 | 288 | –5.06 | 21 | –33 | –27 | |
| Slow-4 | mPFC | 10‵ 11‵ 34 | 890 | 5.12 | –6 | 54 | –21 |
| Right superior temporal gyrus | 38‵ 22 | 258 | 5.19 | 57 | 9 | –9 | |
| Cerebellum, PCC, parahippocampus | 30‵ 25 | 454 | –5.44 | 3 | –39 | –15 | |
| Right insula | 13‵ 6 | 253 | –4.84 | 39 | –6 | 21 | |
| Slow-3 | mPFC, Right superior temporal gyrus | 10‵ 11‵ 38 | 1,622 | 6.10 | 0 | 39 | –24 |
| 8‵ 6 | 301 | 4.18 | 9 | 24 | 60 | ||
| Cerebellum, PCC, parahippocampus | 30‵ 35 | 629 | –4.75 | 27 | –39 | –30 | |
| Right insula, precentral gyrus, postcentral gyrus, amygdala | 13‵ 4,722‵ 3,834‵ 6 | 448 | –4.58 | 51 | 9 | 6 | |
| Slow-2 | mPFC, Right superior temporal gyrus | 6‵ 8–1,138‵ 46 | 3,327 | 5.16 | 12 | 36 | –24 |
| Cerebellum, PCC, parahippocampus | 23‵ 2,730 | 1,358 | –5.43 | 15 | –36 | –15 | |
| Right insula, precentral gyrus, postcentral gyrus, amygdala | 13‵ 4,738‵ 2,234‵ 6 | 764 | –5.12 | 45 | 0 | 3 | |
| Left insula, precentral gyrus, amygdala | 13‵ 2,234‵ 4,144 | 439 | –4.68 | –45 | –18 | 3 | |
BA, Brodmann; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex.
FIGURE 4Individual and group values of zALFF across frequency bands in mPFC, cerebellum/PCC, right and left insula (TSA, tactile sham acupuncture; AAS, ankle acupuncture stimulation, frequency bands in gray denote no difference in the present comparison).
FIGURE 5The scatter plots between zALFF and pain. Frequency-specific resting-state activity in the cerebellum and insular was correlated to AAS analgesia (the relationship were determined by Pearson coefficient value).