| Literature DB >> 34949966 |
Maarten Vanhaverbeke1, Ward Eertmans2, Wouter Holvoet2, Ief Hendrickx2, Keir McCutcheon1,3, Christophe Dubois1,3, Joseph Dens2, Johan Bennett1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The field of CTO PCI is expanding, but successful and safe percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) requires a substantial resource and experience investment. We aimed to assess temporal trends in strategies and outcomes of 2 dedicated programs for CTO PCI.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34949966 PMCID: PMC8670896 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8042633
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Interv Cardiol ISSN: 0896-4327 Impact factor: 2.279
Baseline patient characteristics.
| All ( | Years 1–4 ( | Years 5–9 ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | ||||
| Age | 66 ± 10 | 65 ± 11 | 66 ± 10 | 0.201 |
| Male | 784 (85.2) | 259 (86.0) | 525 (84.8) | 0.692 |
| BMI | 28.5 ± 8.1 | 29.6 ± 12.7 | 28.0 ± 4.4 |
|
|
| ||||
| Risk factors | ||||
| Current smoker | 202 (22.0) | 66 (21.9) | 136 (22.0) | 1.0 |
| Hypertension | 634 (68.9) | 188 (62.5) | 446 (72.1) |
|
| Hypercholesterolemia | 784 (85.2) | 230 (76.4) | 554 (89.5) |
|
| Diabetes | 251 (27.3) | 79 (26.2) | 172 (27.8) | 0.637 |
|
| ||||
| Medical history | ||||
| Prior MI | 338 (36.7) | 92 (30.6) | 246 (39.7) |
|
| Prior PCI | 436 (47.4) | 132 (43.9) | 304 (49.1) | 0.140 |
| Prior CABG | 130 (14.1) | 37 (12.3) | 93 (15.0) | 0.313 |
| Prior stroke | 59 (6.4) | 22 (7.3) | 37 (6.0) | 0.474 |
| PAD | 193 (21.0) | 62 (20.7) | 131 (21.2) | 0.931 |
| CKD | 211 (23.3) | 64 (22.1) | 147 (23.9) | 0.556 |
| Multivessel disease | 489 (56.4) | 165 (54.8) | 324 (57.2) | 0.518 |
|
| ||||
| LV function | ||||
| LV EF | 55 ± 12 | 57 ± 12 | 54 ± 12 |
|
| LV EF ≤ 35% | 83 (9.2) | 21 (7.0) | 62 (10.4) | 0.113 |
|
| ||||
| CTO presentation | ||||
| ACS | 136 (14.8) | 43 (14.3) | 93 (15.1) | 0.768 |
| Stable angina | 570 (62.4) | 185 (61.5) | 385 (62.9) | 0.716 |
| Atypical chest pain | 21 (2.3) | 5 (1.7) | 16 (2.6) | 0.483 |
| Asymptomatic | 135 (15.0) | 61 (20.3) | 74 (12.3) |
|
| Silent ischemia | 275 (32.5) | 90 (30.0) | 185 (33.8) | 0.283 |
|
| ||||
| Target vessel | ||||
| LAD | 248 (27.0) | 89 (29.6) | 159 (25.7) | 0.235 |
| CX | 150 (16.3) | 49 (16.3) | 101 (16.3) | 1.0 |
| RCA | 516 (56.1) | 160 (53.2) | 356 (57.5) | 0.229 |
| LMCA | 6 (0.7) | 3 (1.0) | 3 (0.5) | 0.399 |
ACS, acute coronary syndrome; BMI, body mass index; CTO, chronic total occlusion; CX, circumflex coronary artery; CKD, chronic kidney disease; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LV, left ventricular; LV EF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LMCA, left main coronary artery; PAD, peripheral artery disease; RCA, right coronary artery. Dichotomous variables are reported as number (percentages). Continuous variables are reported as means with standard deviation. Significant p values below 0.05 are shown in bold.
In-hospital complications.
| All ( | Years 1–4 ( | Years 5–9 ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any complication | 86 (9.3) | 23 (7.6) | 63 (10.2) | 0.230 |
| Major complication | 43 (4.7) | 9 (3.0) | 34 (5.5) | 0.098 |
| Major adverse cardiovascular events | 23 (2.5) | 4 (1.3) | 19 (3.1) | 0.175 |
| In-hospital death | 3 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.3) | 1.0 |
| Stroke | 2 (0.2) | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.2) | 0.548 |
| Periprocedural MI | 18 (2.0) | 2 (0.7) | 16 (2.6) | 0.072 |
|
| ||||
| Coronary complications | 37 (4.0) | 13 (4.3) | 24 (3.9) | 0.724 |
| CTO vessel | 27 (2.9) | 10 (3.3) | 17 (2.7) | 0.678 |
| Donor vessel | 10 (1.1) | 3 (1.0) | 7 (1.1) | 1.0 |
| Coronary perforation | 28 (3.0) | 10 (3.3) | 18 (2.9) | 0.838 |
| Ellis type 2 or more | 18 (2.0) | 8 (2.7) | 10 (1.6) | 0.314 |
| Requiring intervention | 12 (1.3) | 3 (1.0) | 9 (1.5) | 0.760 |
|
| ||||
| Vascular complications | 30 (3.3) | 6 (2.0) | 24 (3.9) | 0.166 |
| Retroperitoneal hematoma | 3 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.3) | 1.0 |
| Hematoma > 5 cm | 12 (1.3) | 5 (1.7) | 7 (1.1) | 0.542 |
| Pseudoaneurysm | 12 (1.3) | 0 (0) | 12 (1.9) |
|
| Acute limb ischemia | 3 (0.3) | 0 (0.5) | 3 (0.5) | 0.555 |
|
| ||||
| Major vascular complication | 9 (1.0) | 3 (1.0) | 6 (1.0) | 1.0 |
|
| ||||
| Others | ||||
| Pericardial effusion | 16 (1.7) | 6 (2.0) | 10 (1.6) | 0.789 |
| Major bleeding | 9 (1.0) | 3 (1.0) | 6 (1.0) | 1.0 |
| Contrast-induced nephropathy | 16 (1.7) | 4 (1.3) | 12 (1.9) | 0.601 |
|
| ||||
| Myocardial injury | ||||
| hsTroponin T, baseline (ng/L) | 15 (9–30) | 18 (10–40) | 14 (9–25) |
|
| hsTroponin T, day 1 (ng/L) | 43 (22–110) | 33 (18–90) | 50 (24–127) |
|
| Coronary procedure-related myocardial injury | 462 (71.0) | 154 (61.1) | 308 (77.2) |
|
CTO, chronic total occlusion; hsTroponin T, high-sensitivity troponin T; MI, myocardial infarction. Troponin values are median with interquartile range. Dichotomous variables are reported as number (percentages). Significant p values below 0.05 are shown in bold.
Figure 1Temporal trends in the success rates and approaches of CTO PCI. (a) Significant improvement in technical success up to 85.6% and procedural success up to 84.1% in year 9 (p value for trend both <0.001). (b) Significant increase in the lesion complexity (increase in J-CTO score) (p value for trend <0.001), with an increase in retrograde and dissection/reentry techniques. (c) There was evolution from the use of the CrossBoss catheter to contemporary ADR techniques using dual or triple lumen microcatheters. (d) Temporal increase in the number of guidewires, microcatheters, and guide extensions (all p value for trend <0.001) and balloons (p=0.028). (e) Increase in the average stent length (p value for trend <0.001). (f) More comprehensive approaches with an increase in the use of dual injections and intracoronary imaging but contemporary with an increase in at least one radial access and a decrease in sheaths larger than 7F (all p for trend <0.001). (g) Temporal increase in fluoroscopy time (p=0.028) but decrease in the skin dose (p < 0.001). (h) Regression model adjusted for age, LV EF, vessel, J-CTO score, the use of microcatheters, dual injections, and intracoronary imaging showing a significant increase in technical success starting from year 3 and year 4, compared to year 1 as reference. ADR, antegrade dissection/reentry; AWE, antegrade wire escalation; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; J-CTO, Multicentre CTO Registry of Japan score; LV EF, left ventricular ejection fraction; OCT, optical coherence tomography; OR, odds ratio; RDR, retrograde dissection/reentry; RWE, retrograde wire escalation.
Figure 2Temporal trends in the complications. (a) Stable rates of in-hospital major complications and MACE (cardiovascular death, stroke, and periprocedural MI) (p value for trend 0.330 and 0.404, respectively). (b) A significant temporal increase in the rate of coronary procedure-related myocardial injury (p value for trend <0.001), without an increase in periprocedural MI (p value for trend 0.310). MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; URL, upper reference limit.