| Literature DB >> 34948886 |
Siyao Ma1,2, Yalin Song1,2,3, Xueyan Ye1,2, Xinqiang Du1,2, Jingjia Ma4.
Abstract
Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) using urban stormwater facilitates relieving water supply pressure, restoring the ecological environment, and developing sustainable water resources. However, compared to conventional water sources, such as river water and lake water, MAR using urban stormwater is a typically intermittent recharge mode. In order to study the clogging and water quality change effects of Fe, Zn, and Pb, the typical mental pollutants in urban stormwater, a series of intermittent MAR column experiments were performed. The results show that the type of pollutant, the particle size of the medium and the intermittent recharge mode have significant impacts on the pollutant retention and release, which has led to different clogging and water quality change effects. The metals that are easily retained in porous media have greater potential for clogging and less potential for groundwater pollution. The fine medium easily becomes clogged, but it is beneficial in preventing groundwater contamination. There is a higher risk of groundwater contamination for a shallow buried aquifer under intermittent MAR than continuous MAR, mainly because of the de-clogging effect of porous media during the intermittent period.Entities:
Keywords: clogging; intermittent MAR; metal contamination; urban stormwater; water quality change
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34948886 PMCID: PMC8701788 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182413272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Mineral composition of the filter media.
| Mineral Name | Chemical Formula | Content (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Quartz | SiO2 | 21 |
| Potash (alkaline) feldspar | KAlSi3O8 | 22 |
| Plagioclase | Na[AlSi3O8]-Ca[Al2Si2O8] | 52 |
| Biotite | K(Mg,Fe)3AlSi3O10(F,OH)2 | 5 |
Quality characteristics of the tap water.
| Component | HCO3− | CO32− | Cl− | SO42− | NO3− | K+ | Na+ | Ca2+ | Mg2+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration(mg/L) | 75.4 | 0.0 | 22.9 | 26.9 | 10.0 | 5.5 | 9.1 | 13.8 | 5.3 |
Figure 1Physical diagram of the intermittent recharge experimental setups.
Pollutant migration design under different conditions.
| Group | Pollutant | Concentration (mg/L) | Medium | Hydraulic | Intermittent Time (d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Fe | 3 | Fine sand | 1 | 3 |
| E2 | Fe | 3 | Medium sand | 1 | 3 |
| E3 | Zn | 1 | Fine sand | 1 | 3 |
| E4 | Zn | 1 | Medium sand | 1 | 3 |
| E5 | Pb | 2 | Fine sand | 1 | 3 |
| E6 | Pb | 2 | Medium sand | 1 | 3 |
Figure 2Diagram of K/K0 vs. C/C0. (a) E1 (Fe + fine sand); (b) E2 (Fe + medium sand); (c) E3 (Zn + fine sand); (d) E4 (Zn + medium sand); (e) E5 (Pb + fine sand); (f) E6 (Pb + medium sand).
Figure 3Cumulative mass distribution of pollutants in media with different particle sizes. (a) E1 and E2 (Fe); (b) E3 + E4 (Zn); (c) E5 + E6 (Pb).
Mass balance information from the column experiment. Here, MIn denotes the injection mass of pollutant; MBTC and MRet denote the mass of the injection pollutant that was recovered in the breakthrough curve and retained in the sand column, respectively.
| No. | MIn (mg) | MBTC (mg) | MRet (mg) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recharge Stage | Recharge Stage | ||||||
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | ||
| E1 | 165.0 | 60.0 | 40.5 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 251.8 |
| E2 | 184.5 | 105.0 | 60.0 | 9.2 | 7.0 | 2.2 | 325.8 |
| E3 | 160.0 | 136.0 | 137.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 430.7 |
| E4 | 815.0 | 380.0 | 425.0 | 13.7 | 7.1 | 9.7 | 1588.1 |
| E5 | 296.0 | 267.0 | 269.0 | 66.2 | 28.7 | 60.6 | 675.7 |
| E6 | 996.0 | 872.0 | 710.0 | 27.1 | 8.4 | 24.2 | 2509.1 |
Figure 4Clogging effect of background water.
Corresponding characteristic values of C/C0 and K/K0.
| Recharge Stage | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | E5 | E6 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | Start | End | Start | End | Start | End | Start | End | Start | End | ||
| 1st recharge | C/C0 | 0 | 0.35 | 0 | 0.48 | 0 | 0.03 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 0.0008 | 0 | 0.26 |
| K/K0 | 1 | 0.08 | 1 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.45 | 1 | 0.28 | |
| 2nd recharge | C/C0 | 0.57 | 0.30 | 0.80 | 0.46 | 0.71 | 0.04 | 0.58 | 0.17 | 0.0019 | 0.0003 | 0.41 | 0.07 |
| K/K0 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.79 | 0.43 | 0.63 | 0.28 | |
| 3rd recharge | C/C0 | 0.49 | 0.32 | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.77 | 0.20 | 0.0013 | 0.0007 | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| K/K0 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.73 | 0.37 | 0.50 | 0.26 | |
Figure 5Water content change with time. (a) E1 (Fe + fine sand); (b) E2 (Fe + medium sand); (c) E3 (Zn + fine sand); (d) E4 (Zn + medium sand); (e) E5 (Pb + fine sand); (f) E6 (Pb + medium sand).
Figure 6Redox potential change with time. (a) E1 (Fe + fine sand); (b) E2 (Fe + medium sand); (c) E3 (Zn + fine sand); (d) E4 (Zn + medium sand); (e) E5 (Pb + fine sand); (f) E6 (Pb + medium sand).