| Literature DB >> 34948884 |
Pejman Ebrahimi1, Datis Khajeheian2, Maria Fekete-Farkas3.
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate how social network marketing affects consumers' sustainable purchase behavior (CSPB) while considering the role of Eco-friendly attitude. The statistical population of the study included Iranian users of online social networks with at least one online purchasing experience. An online questionnaire was distributed on Instagram, Telegram, and WhatsApp platforms as the most popular networks in the country. By use of convenience sampling, commonly used in quantitative studies to overcome bias, 450 out of 475 returned questionnaires were acceptable, showing a response rate of 94.7%. The results indicated that an increase in Eco-friendly attitude positively increases the effect of word of mouth on consumers' sustainable purchase behavior. Meanwhile, Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) revealed that to reach a 50% level of consumers' sustainable purchase behavior, six essential necessary conditions are required: an eco-friendly consumers' attitude at no less than 50%, the trend at no less than 57.1%, word of mouth at no less than 45.5%, interaction at no less than 42.9%, customization at no less than 35.3% and entertainment at no less than 26.7%. Furthermore, the Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA) was investigated as a strategic tool. The results of IPMA showed that "buy products that use biodegradable material in packaging", "buy those products that are picked up and recycled", and "buy biodegradable products even if they belong to a less well-known company" show desirable performance and high importance and there is a great opportunity for expansion in this area.Entities:
Keywords: SEM-NCA; consumers’ sustainable purchase behavior; eco-friendly attitude; social media marketing activities; social networks marketing
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34948884 PMCID: PMC8704288 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182413276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Research Model (Source: Authors).
Figure 2Pair plot of the respondents’ demographic data (Source: authors’ calculations based on Python programming/Seaborn package).
Figure 3Path coefficients model (CUS: Customization, INT: Interaction, WOM: Word of Mouth, ENT: Entertainment, TRE: Trend, ATT: Eco-friendly Attitude, CSPB: Customers’ sustainable Purchase Behavior).
Measurement models.
| Variables and Items | Outer Loadings | VIF |
|---|---|---|
| Entertainment [ | ||
| ENT 1: The contents on social networks are believed to be thought-provoking in using sustainable products. | 0.871 | 2.615 |
| ENT 2: Using social networks is exciting. | 0.881 | 2.452 |
| ENT 3: Gathering data on sustainable services and sustainable products through social networks is fun. | 0.819 | 2.047 |
| ENT 4: Using social networks saves time in identifying sustainable products easily. | 0.790 | 1.619 |
| Customization [ | ||
| CUS 1: Looking for tailored data related to sustainable products and services on social networks is possible. | 0.701 | 1.507 |
| CUS 2: Customized services are offered by social networks. | 0.751 | 1.618 |
| CUS 3: Social networks offer exciting feed data that users are interested in. | 0.766 | 1.709 |
| CUS 4: Using Social networks makes it easy to find sustainable products. | 0.792 | 1.787 |
| CUS 5: Social networks are everywhere. | 0.848 | 2.231 |
| Interaction [ | ||
| INT 1: Conveying opinions between buyers/sellers through social networks is easy. | 0.894 | 2.891 |
| INT 2: Exchange of opinions or conversations related to sustainable products and services with buyers/sellers through social networks. | 0.859 | 2.552 |
| INT 3: Two-way interaction through social networks is easy. | 0.849 | 1.899 |
| INT 4: Sharing data with buyers/sellers through social networks is easy. | 0.637 | 1.293 |
| Word of mouth [ | ||
| WOM 1: I like to share information about sustainable products or services from social networks with my friends. | 0.890 | 2.056 |
| WOM 2: I like uploading content from social networks on my page, blog, or microblog. | 0.824 | 1.746 |
| WOM 3: I like sharing thoughts on items or services acquired from social networks with my friends. | 0.843 | 1.702 |
| Trend [ | ||
| TRE 1: It is a leading brand and supports sustainable products/services by using social networks. | 0.903 | 1.422 |
| TRE 2: Contents related to sustainable products/services on social networks are fresh. | 0.852 | 1.422 |
| eco-friendly consumers’ attitude [ | ||
| ATT1: I would prefer to buy products that use biodegradable material in packaging. | 0.782 | 1.513 |
| ATT2: I would wish to buy those products that are picked up and recycled for other use.rend | 0.852 | 1.716 |
| ATT3: I would buy biodegradable products even if they belong to a less well-known company. | 0.874 | 1.787 |
| CSPB [ | ||
| CSPB1: I would buy products with eco-friendly packaging in the near future. | 0.853 | 1.708 |
| CSPB2: I plan to buy eco-friendly packaged products regularly. | 0.821 | 1.599 |
| CSPB3: I intend to buy products with eco-friendly packaging due to my environmental concerns. | 0.838 | 1.641 |
Notes: SD: Standard deviation; AVE: Average of Variance Extracted; C. alpha: Cronbach’s alpha; Rho_A, rho_A: reliability indices for each construct; CR: Composite Reliability; VIF: Variance Inflation Factor in items; level. CUS: Customization, INT: Interaction, WOM: Word of Mouth, ENT: Entertainment, TRE: Trend, ATT: Eco-friendly Attitude, CSPB: Customers’ sustainable Purchase Behavior
Discriminant validity.
| Constructs | CSPB | CUS | ENT | INT | TRE | WOM | ATT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSPM | 0.837 | ||||||
| CUS | 0.723 | 0.773 | |||||
| ENT | 0.747 | 0.683 | 0.841 | ||||
| INT | 0.750 | 0.664 | 0.722 | 0.816 | |||
| TRE | 0.730 | 0.756 | 0.726 | 0.755 | 0.878 | ||
| WOM | 0.750 | 0.748 | 0.698 | 0.759 | 0.657 | 0.853 | |
| ATT | 0.744 | 0.646 | 0.692 | 0.658 | 0.624 | 0.658 | 0.837 |
Notes: Data in Table 2 are square roots of AVE (numbers in oblique line) and discriminant validity of a measurement model requires correlations between the constructs to be smaller than the square root of AVE; CSPB, CSPB; CUS, Customization; ENT, Entertainment; INT, Interaction; TRE, Trened; WOM, Word of mouth; ATT, eco-friendly consumers’ attitude.
Results of research hypotheses and model fit.
| Hypotheses | Direct Effect | Standard Deviation (SD) | T-Statistics | Low CI (Confidence Interval) | High CI | Moderation | Decision | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | 0.354 | 0.036 | 9.921 *** | 0.000 | 0.286 | 0.451 | Supported | |
| H2 | 0.121 | 0.045 | 2.707 ** | 0.007 | 0.463 | 0.612 | Supported | |
| H3 | 0.414 | 0.036 | 11.400 *** | 0.000 | 0.782 | 0.869 | Supported | |
| H4 | 0.011 | 0.029 | 0.376 | 0.707 | 0.767 | 0.885 | Not Supported | |
| H5 | 0.014 | 0.032 | 0.431 | 0.667 | 0.644 | 0.802 | Not Supported | |
| H6a | 0.070 | 0.048 | 1.472 | 0.142 | 0.315 | 0.478 | No | Not Supported |
| H6b | 0.043 | 0.043 | 1.000 | 0.318 | 0.141 | 0.325 | No | Not Supported |
| H6c | 0.188 | 0.070 | 2.667 ** | 0.008 | 0.285 | 0.410 | Yes | Supported |
| H6d | 0.138 | 0.040 | 3.462 *** | 0.001 | Yes | Supported | ||
| H6e | 0.063 | 0.046 | 1.370 | 0.171 | No | Not Supported | ||
| Model fit | R2 | R2 Adjusted | Q2 predict | |||||
| CSPB | 85.9% | 85.6% | 0.576 |
Note: t > 1.96 at * p < 0.05; t > 2.58 at ** p < 0.01; t > 3.29 at *** p < 0.001; two-tailed test.
Figure 4Moderating effect (Word of Mouth*Attitude-Consumer Sustainable Purchase Behavior).
PLS predict assessment of the manifest variable CPB.
| Items | RMSEPLS-SEM | RMSELM | ∆RMSE |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSPB1 | 0.423 | 0.447 | −0.024 |
| CSPB2 | 0.529 | 0.534 | −0.005 |
| CSPB3 | 0.483 | 0.492 | −0.009 |
Notes: RMSE = root mean squared error; gray-shaded results = PLS-SEM’s predictive power is lower than the LM benchmark.
Figure 5Scatter plots of Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA).
Bottleneck table and NCA effect sizes.
| Bottleneck CSPB | ENT | CUS | INT | WOM | TRE | ATT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | NN | NN | NN | NN | NN | NN |
| 10 | 20.0 | NN | 7.1 | 9.1 | NN | NN |
| 20 | 26.7 | 35.3 | 28.6 | 18.2 | 28.6 | 20.0 |
| 30 | 26.7 | 35.3 | 28.6 | 18.2 | 42.9 | 50.0 |
| 40 | 26.7 | 35.3 | 42.9 | 45.5 | 57.1 | 50.0 |
| 50 | 26.7 | 35.3 | 42.9 | 45.5 | 57.1 | 50.0 |
| 60 | 26.7 | 35.3 | 42.9 | 45.5 | 57.1 | 50.0 |
| 70 | 26.7 | 64.7 | 42.9 | 45.5 | 57.1 | 50.0 |
| 80 | 60.0 | 64.7 | 57.1 | 54.5 | 71.4 | 60.0 |
| 90 | 60.0 | 64.7 | 57.1 | 72.7 | 71.4 | 60.0 |
| 100 | 86.7 | 76.5 | 78.6 | 72.7 | 71.4 | 70.0 |
| NCA effect sizes (Accuracy and fit are 100%) | ||||||
| Construct | CE-FDH | Slope | ||||
| ENT (Entertainment) | 0.387 * | 1.066 | ||||
| CUS (Customization) | 0.447 * | 1.155 | ||||
| INT (Interaction) | 0.429 * | 1.318 | ||||
| WOM (Word of Mouth) | 0.427 * | 1.291 | ||||
| TRE (Trend) | 0.514 * | 1.198 | ||||
| ATT (Eco-friendly Attitude) | 0.460 * | 1.382 | ||||
Note: t > 1.96 at * p < 0.05; CE-FDH for CSPB, ceiling envelopment-free disposal hull.