| Literature DB >> 34948669 |
Yichun Hu1, Siran Li1, Jun Wang2, Deqiang Zheng3, Huidi Zhang1, Wei Yu2, Lijia Zhu2, Zhen Liu1, Xiaoguang Yang1, Lichen Yang1.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) in Chinese childbearing women, and to estimate the optimum threshold of 25(OH)D that maximally inhibits the PTH, which is considered to be the optimal status for vitamin D sufficiency.Entities:
Keywords: 25-hydroxyvitamin D; Chinese childbearing women; parathyroid hormone; threshold
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34948669 PMCID: PMC8702147 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182413060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
25 hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and intact parathyroid hormone concentration (PTH) of Chinese childbearing women aged 18–44 y.
| Characteristic | N (%) | 25(OH)D (ng/mL) * | PTH (pg/mL) * | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 1568 | 16.6 (11.9–22.4) | 34.3 (25.6–44.5) | ||
| City type | <0.0001 | 0.912 | |||
| Urban | 663 (42.3) | 15.2 (11.2–20.7) | 34.2 (25.7–43.9) | ||
| Rural | 905 (57.7) | 17.8 (12.6–23.9) | 34.4 (25.5–44.9) | ||
| Age group, y | 0.001 | 0.044 | |||
| 18~24 | 372 (23.7) | 15.3 (11.3–20.7) a | 32.5 (24.1–43.8) | ||
| 25~29 | 363 (23.2) | 16.7 (12.1–23.0) | 34.0 (25.3–45.1) | ||
| 30~34 | 256 (16.3) | 17.0 (12.0–23.4) b | 34.0 (23.9–43.8) | ||
| 35~39 | 245 (15.6) | 16.7 (12.3–21.8) | 36.2 (27.3–44.4) | ||
| ≥40 | 332 (21.2) | 17.5 (12.4–23.7) b | 34.5 (28.1–45.4) | ||
| Latitude, °N | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |||
| <23.5 | 131 (8.4) | 25.3 (21.1–29.7) a | 27.0 (22.4–35.3) a | ||
| 23.5~31.9 | 628 (40.1) | 20.2 (15.5–24.6) b | 35.3 (27.1–46.7) | ||
| 32~40.4 | 550 (35.1) | 12.8 (10.3–17.0) c | 34.1 (25.4–45.0) | ||
| ≥40.5 | 259 (16.5) | 13.2 (10.2–17.6) c | 34.9 (26.3–44.7) | ||
| Season | <0.001 | 0.003 | |||
| Spring | 143 (9.1) | 16.0 (11.6–21.6) | 30.3 (23.0–44.0) b | ||
| Autumn | 785 (50.1) | 17.4 (12.6–23.0) a | 33.1 (25.4–43.2) | ||
| Winter | 640 (40.8) | 15.6 (11.2–21.8) b | 36.0 (26.9–46.4) a | ||
| BMI | 0.819 | <0.001 | |||
| Thin | 130 (8.3) | 15.9 (11.9–21.8) | 31.8 (24.7–44.3) | ||
| Normal | 895 (57.1) | 16.7 (11.9–22.4) | 33.0 (24.6–43.5) a | ||
| Overweight | 385 (24.5) | 16.5 (12.0–23.0) | 36.4 (27.7–47.2) b | ||
| Obesity | 158 (10.1) | 17.2 (12.0–21.5) | 37.2 (27.8–44.3) |
a,b,c There were significant differences among groups (p < 0.05); * the concentration of 25(OH)D and PTH was expressed as the median and interquartile, P50 (P25-P75); N, numbers of cases.
Linear correlation analysis between 25(OH)D, PTH and related variables.
| Variables | 25(OH)D, | |
|---|---|---|
| PTH | −0.161 (−0.210–−0.111) | <0.0001 |
| City type | 0.153 (0.107–0.200) | <0.0001 |
| Age | 0.093 (0.046–0.141) | 0.0002 |
| Latitude | −0.541 (−0.575–−0.503) | <0.0001 |
| Season | −0.066 (−0.114–−0.016) | 0.010 |
| BMI | 0.027 (−0.021–0.081) | 0.283 |
| Corrected calcium | 0.071 (0.014–0.125) | 0.012 |
| Phosphorus | 0.083 (0.025–0.138) | 0.003 |
Partial correlation between PTH and 25(OH)D under different 25(OH)D levels.
| 25(OH)D Concentrtaion | Partial Correlation Coefficient (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| total | −0.168 (−0.227–−0.109) | <0.0001 |
| <12 ng/mL | −0.182 (−0.300–−0.065) | 0.003 |
| 12–20 ng/mL | −0.123 (−0.210–−0.036) | 0.012 |
| 20–30 ng/mL | 0.001 (−0.095–0.108) | 0.980 |
| ≥30 ng/mL | 0.072 (−0.156–0.296) | 0.575 |
Figure 1Adjusted relationship between 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and intact parathyroid hormone (PTH): y-PTH, x-adjusted 25(OH)D; (A) locally Weighted Regression Smooth Scatterplot (LOESS); (B) Segmented Regression Plot based on the cut-points obtained from the nonlinear least squares estimation; β-Slope of each line segment.