| Literature DB >> 34948425 |
Ola Gutziet1,2, Roee Iluz1,2, Hila Ben Asher1,2, Linoy Segal1,2, Dikla Ben Zvi1,2, Yuval Ginsberg1,2, Nizar Khatib1,2, Osnat Zmora3,4, Michael G Ross5, Zeev Weiner1,2, Ron Beloosesky1,2.
Abstract
Perinatal hypoxia is a major cause of infant brain damage, lifelong neurological disability, and infant mortality. N-Acetyl-Cysteine (NAC) is a powerful antioxidant that acts directly as a scavenger of free radicals. We hypothesized that maternal-antenatal and offspring-postnatal NAC can protect offspring brains from hypoxic brain damage.Sixty six newborn rats were randomized into four study groups. Group 1: Control (CON) received no hypoxic intervention. Group 2: Hypoxia (HYP)-received hypoxia protocol. Group 3: Hypoxia-NAC (HYP-NAC). received hypoxia protocol and treated with NAC following each hypoxia episode. Group 4: NAC Hypoxia (NAC-HYP) treated with NAC during pregnancy, pups subject to hypoxia protocol. Each group was evaluated for: neurological function (Righting reflex), serum proinflammatory IL-6 protein levels (ELISA), brain protein levels: NF-κB p65, neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), TNF-α, and IL-6 (Western blot) and neuronal apoptosis (histology evaluation with TUNEL stain). Hypoxia significantly increased pups brain protein levels compared to controls. NAC administration to dams or offspring demonstrated lower brain NF-κB p65, nNOS, TNF-α and IL-6 protein levels compared to hypoxia alone. Hypoxia significantly increased brain apoptosis as evidenced by higher grade of brain TUNEL reaction. NAC administration to dams or offspring significantly reduce this effect. Hypoxia induced acute sensorimotor dysfunction. NAC treatment to dams significantly attenuated hypoxia-induced acute sensorimotor dysfunction. Prophylactic NAC treatment of dams during pregnancy confers long-term protection to offspring with hypoxia associated brain injury, measured by several pathways of injury and correlated markers with pathology and behavior. This implies we may consider prophylactic NAC treatment for patients at risk for hypoxia during labor.Entities:
Keywords: N-Acetyl Cysteine; brain injury; hypoxia; inflammation; oxidative stress; sensorimotor dysfunction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34948425 PMCID: PMC8709193 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413629
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Offspring brain nNOS and NFkB protein levels in Control, Hypoxia, NAC-Hypoxia and Hypoxia-NAC groups: Hypoxia significantly increased offspring brain nNOS and NFkB protein levels compared to control, while NAC treatment decreased hypoxia-induced brain NFkB and nNOS pathways. * Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to Hypoxia.
Figure 2Offspring brain TNF-α and IL-6 protein levels in Control, Hypoxia, NAC-Hypoxia and Hypoxia-NAC groups: Hypoxia significantly increased offspring brain TNF-α and IL-6 protein levels compared to control, while NAC treatment decreased hypoxia-induced brain TNF-α and IL-6 levels. * Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to Hypoxia.
Figure 3Offspring neuronal Tunel staining (orange arrows) in Control (A), Hypoxia (B), NAC-Hypoxia (C) and Hypoxia-NAC groups (D), X40. Hypoxia pups had a higher grade of TUNEL reaction (grade 2) compared to control (grade 1). NAC to pregnant dams or offspring decreased TUNEL reaction to grade 1, similar to controls.
Figure 4Sensorimotor function evaluation in Control, Hypoxia, NAC-Hypoxia and Hypoxia-NAC groups: Righting reflex on the fifth day of life. Hypoxia significantly Induced acute sensorimotor dysfunction in offspring measured by Righting reflex compared to control. NAC treatment during pregnancy prior to hypoxia significantly attenuated Hypoxia induced acute sensorimotor dysfunction. * Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to hypoxia.
Pups weight and mortality in the different groups: Control, Hypoxia, NAC-Hypoxia and Hypoxia-NAC. * p value < 0.05 compered to Hypoxia.
| NAC-HYO (n = 23) | HYP-NAC (n = 21) | HYO (n = 11) | CON (n = 11) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth Weight | ||||
| Average weight (gr) | 6.26 | 5.94 | 6.07 | 6.16 |
| SD | 0.31 | 0.52 | 0.19 | 0.43 |
| Weight at day 5 of life | ||||
| Average (gr) | 9.4 * | 9.04 | 8.88 | 9.04 |
| SD | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.21 | 0.32 |
| Mortality | ||||
| 2 (8.69%) | 1 (4.76%) | 2 (20%) | 0 (0%) | |
Figure 5Maternal liver glutathione level in NAC and control group: Maternal NAC significantly increased maternal liver glutathione levels compared to control.* Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to control.
Scheme 1Study groups: Group 1: Control (CON). Group 2: Hypoxia (HYP). Group 3: Hypoxia-NAC (HYP-NAC). Group 4: NAC Hypoxia (NAC-HYP).