| Literature DB >> 34948219 |
Nadia Cainelli1, Cristian Forestan2, Dario Angeli3, Tomas Roman Villegas3, Fabrizio Costa4, Alessandro Botton1, Angela Rasori1, Claudio Bonghi1, Benedetto Ruperti1.
Abstract
Superficial scald is a post-harvest chilling storage injury leading to browning of the surface of the susceptible cv Granny Smith apples. Wounding of skins has been reported to play a preventive role on scald development however its underlying molecular factors are unknown. We have artificially wounded the epidermal and sub-epidermal layers of apple skins consistently obtaining the prevention of superficial scald in the surroundings of the wounds during two independent vintages. Time course RNA-Seq analyses of the transcriptional changes in wounded versus unwounded skins revealed that two transcriptional waves occurred. An early wave included genes up-regulated by wounding already after 6 h, highlighting a specific transcriptional rearrangement of genes connected to the biosynthesis and signalling of JA, ethylene and ABA. A later transcriptional wave, occurring after three months of cold storage, included genes up-regulated exclusively in unwounded skins and was prevented from its occurrence in wounded skins. A significant portion of these genes was related to decay of tissues and to the senescence hormones ABA, JA and ethylene. Such changes suggest a wound-inducible reversed hormonal balance during post-harvest storage which may explain the local inhibition of scald in wounded tissues, an aspect that will need further studies for its mechanistic explanation.Entities:
Keywords: RNA-Seq; abiotic stressjasmonic acid; apple superficial scald; cold storage; ethylene; post-harvest; senescence; transcriptomics
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34948219 PMCID: PMC8705499 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413425
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(A) 2D pictures of the entire surface of Granny Smith apples at six hours after wounding (before storage) and after one and three months of cold storage (1.7 °C) followed by 8 days of shelf life. Pictures were taken at 3, 5 and 8 days of shelf-life by two-dimensional acquisition of the entire apple surface as described in materials and methods. Representative pictures are shown at the 8th day of shelf life, when symptoms of scald development became clearly visible. Black dots were applied on the apple surface to highlight the exact sites where wounding was performed. The right panel in A shows an enlargement of the boxed insets, to give a close-up view of the difference in terms of scald development between the wounded (red box) and the unwounded (blue box) areas of the apple surface after three months of storage followed by 8 days of shelf-life. (B) Dynamics of superficial scald incidence were expressed as mean percentage (±SD) of browned scald area over the total apple surface, measured on a total number of 10 (2019) and 20 (2020) independent apples (replicates) for each thesis after three months of cold storage and evaluated by 2D acquisition at different time-points of shelf-life over a period of 8 days (at 0, 3 and 8 days in 2019 and at 0, 3, 5 and 8 days in 2020). The incidence is shown separately for the wounded apple half versus non-wounded control half of apples. * and ** indicate a statistically significant difference between the means with a p-value of 0.1 and 0.05, respectively.
Figure 2(A) Diagram representing the percentage of genes identified as differentially expressed by RNA-Seq analyses in the comparison between wounded and control (unwounded) Granny Smith apple skins at 6 h after wounding (6 h), and after one and three months of storage (1 M and 3 M). Only DEGs with FDR < 5% were included. DEGs were classified as up-regulated or down-regulated (comparison between the treatments is >1 or <1, respectively, accordingly to their FPKM values. The prevalence of mainly up-regulated DEGs in the first two time-points is reversed at the last time point when down-regulated DEGs prevailed. (B) Fold change distribution of the DEGs identified by the RNA-Seq experiments in the three comparisons analysed. The ratios reported represent the comparison of wounded vs. control at the three time points of interest. Orange, yellow and pale yellow represent the fraction of genes that are up regulated, the grey area indicates the percentage of genes that show no statistically significant variation, and the blue fractions indicate the percentage of genes that are down regulated in wounded tissue in respect to the control. Different shades indicate the entity of variation based on the log2FC. (C) Venn diagrams showing the repartition of down-regulated DEGs and up-regulated DEGs in the comparison between wounded and control samples at three time points. Non-overlapping numbers represent the number of genes unique to each treatment. Overlapping numbers represent the number of mutual genes between treatments. The data refer to samples collected in 2019.
Figure 3Enrichment analysis of DEGs using the Gene Ontology database. GO categories overrepresented among up- and down-regulated gene sets in the wounded apple skin in comparison to non-wounded control skin at three time points 6 h after wounding (6 h), 1 month (1 M) and 3 months (3 M) of conservation. The data refer to samples collected in 2019. In panel (A) GO categories are shown for genes that were upregulated in the comparison between wound and control at 6 h; panel (B): GO categories of genes upregulated in the comparison between wound and control at 1 M; panel (C): GO categories of genes that were downregulated in the comparison between wound and control at 3 M.
Figure 4Expression patterns identified for DEGs regulated in control apples over time are shown in panel (A) while expression patterns of wounded apples are displayed in panel (B). Analogue gene expression patterns for wounded and control apples are shown one on top of another in comparison and Venn Diagrams show the number of genes shared by the two treatments or exclusive for wounded or control apples (panel (C)). Panel (D) shows the GO analysis of genes that were found shared between analogue expression groups in control and wounded apples. The data refer to samples collected in 2019.
Figure 5Heatmap showing the expression patterns of 448 differentially expressed genes in the treatment x time interaction analysis in wounded and control tissues of Granny Smith apples. Red and blue colours represent an increase or decrease in the gene expression levels, respectively. DEGs were identified as significantly differentially expressed with an adjusted p-value of <0.01 out of 28313 genes with nonzero total read counts using DESeq2. The data refer to samples collected in 2019.
Figure 6Time-course expression profiles identified by the time per treatment analysis among storage-regulated DEGs in control and wounded apples, highlighting the significantly different temporal dynamics of expression of specific groups of genes ((A–C); see text for details) as a consequence of wounding. The data refer to samples collected in 2019.
Figure 7Enrichment analysis of DEGs with similar gene expression patterns identified in the treatment and time interaction using the Gene Ontology database between the groups of DEGs reported in Figure 6: groups 1 and 2 (Panel (A)), groups 3,4 and 7 (Panel (B)) and group 6 (Panel (C)). The data refer to samples collected in 2019.
Regulatory genes differentially expressed after 6 h of wounding and after 1 and 3 months of cold storage (only DEGs with a log2FC > |3.5| are listed). Columns from left to right report: description of the encoded protein, the corresponding Rosaceae database ID of the encoding gene, the closest Arabidopsis homologue, log2 fold change of transcript abundance found between wounded and control samples, putative functional/regulatory process played by the closest Arabidopsis homologue, and corresponding reference. The data refer to samples collected in 2019.
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase superfamily protein | MD14G1140400 | AT4G10490.1 | 9.1359 | defense response to oomycetes, salicylic acid catabolic process | [ |
| 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase superfamily protein | MD04G1154400 | AT3G11180.1 | 8.8233 | regulation of jasmonic acid mediated signaling pathway | [ |
| 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase superfamily protein | MD14G1141200 | AT4G10490.1 | 8.6543 | defense response to oomycetes, salicylic acid catabolic process | [ |
| cytochrome P450%2C family 94%2C subfamily C%2C polypeptide 1 | MD03G1140700 | AT2G27690.1 | 7.0295 | response to wounding | [ |
| 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase superfamily protein | MD14G1141000 | AT4G10490.1 | 6.8804 | defense response to oomycetes, salicylic acid catabolic process | [ |
| potassium transporter 1 | MD05G1223100 | AT2G30070.1 | 5.8179 | potassium ion transmembrane transport | [ |
| laccase 7 | MD12G1157100 | AT3G09220.1 | 5.0617 | member of laccase family of genes (17 members in Arabidopsis) | [ |
| Integrase-type DNA-binding superfamily protein | MD10G1032000 | AT5G64750.1 | 4.9703 | wounding stress response | [ |
| UDP-glucosyl transferase 85A2 | MD08G1185700 | AT1G22360.1 | 4.7899 | glucuronosyltransferase activity | |
| Phosphorylase superfamily protein | MD15G1191300 | AT4G28940.1 | 4.7704 | nucleoside metabolic process | |
| hypothetical protein | MD06G1215300 | AT1G13360.1 | 4.7629 | cellular response to hypoxia | |
| high affinity K+ transporter 5 | MD11G1303100 | AT4G13420.1 | 4.5891 | potassium ion transport | [ |
| terpene synthase 14 | MD10G1309900 | AT1G61680.1 | 4.5332 | terpene synthase | [ |
| Uncharacterized protein family (UPF0114) | MD00G1038700 | AT4G19390.1 | 4.4614 | Na+ efflux activity | [ |
| F-box family protein | MD11G1169800 | AT2G27310.1 | 4.4381 | converts 2,3-oxidosqualene to cycloartenol in the sterol biosynthesis pathway | [ |
| RING/U-box superfamily protein | MD09G1240700 | AT2G42360.1 | 4.3325 | protein ubiquitination | |
| basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) DNA-binding superfamily protein | MD15G1305200 | AT4G37850.1 | 4.3299 | regulation of transcription | |
| plastid movement impaired protein | MD16G1029200 | AT2G01340.1 | 4.2995 | response to nematode | [ |
| AZA-guanine resistant1 | MD07G1231600 | AT3G10960.1 | 4.2822 | adenine transport, guanine transport | [ |
| cytochrome P450%2C family 82%2C subfamily G%2C polypeptide 1 | MD10G1158100 | AT3G25180.1 | 4.0730 | defense response to insect wounding | [ |
| anthranilate synthase alpha subunit 1 | MD07G1216200 | AT5G05730.1 | 4.0691 | response to wounding | [ |
| Protein kinase superfamily protein | MD15G1076300 | AT4G00340.1 | 4.0232 | Ser/Thr receptor-like protein kinase | [ |
| RING-H2 finger protein 2B | MD13G1051400 | AT2G01150.1 | 3.8958 | ABA response to abiotic stress/positive regulation of abscisic acid-activated signaling pathway | [ |
| myb domain protein 74 | MD05G1327500 | AT4G05100.1 | 3.8391 | response to salt stress | [ |
| MLP-like protein 423 | MD13G1161700 | AT1G24020.2 | 3.8376 | plant development/defence response | |
| polyamine oxidase 1 | MD02G1306200 | AT5G13700.1 | 3.7689 | reducing Reactive Oxygen Species Production and Increasing Defense Gene Expression | [ |
| Leucine-rich repeat protein kinase family protein | MD06G1198600 | AT1G74360.1 | 3.6803 | defense response to nematode | [ |
| Calcium-binding EF-hand family protein | MD03G1144700 | AT2G27480.1 | 3.6779 | calcium-binding EF-hand family protein | |
| WRKY DNA-binding protein 72 | MD06G1189100 | AT5G15130.1 | 3.6274 | transcriptional reprogramming associated with plant immune responses | [ |
| ARM repeat superfamily protein | MD06G1232800 | AT5G37490.1 | 3.5579 | plant-type hypersensitive response | [ |
| NAD(P)-binding Rossmann-fold superfamily protein | MD06G1003700 | AT2G33590.1 | 3.5458 | response to ABA | [ |
| myb domain protein 15 | MD05G1197600 | AT3G23250.1 | 3.5358 | response to cold | [ |
| cytochrome P450%2C family 94%2C subfamily C%2C polypeptide 1 | MD11G1171100 | AT2G27690.1 | 3.5234 | response to wound | [ |
| cytochrome P450%2C family 71%2C subfamily B%2C polypeptide 37 | MD16G1103600 | AT3G26330.1 | 3.5031 | oxidoreductase activity | |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Glucose-methanol-choline (GMC) oxidoreductase family protein | MD03G1090900 | AT1G73050.1 | 7.2112 | drought resistance | [ |
| 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase superfamily protein | MD11G1074400 | AT1G52800.1 | 7.1643 | hormonal development regulation | |
| Glucose-methanol-choline (GMC) oxidoreductase family protein | MD00G1012900 | AT1G73050.1 | 5.6504 | drought resistance | [ |
| RmlC-like cupins superfamily protein | MD10G1022900 | AT5G38940.1 | 5.0327 | response to abscisic acid (ROP10) | |
| ethylene response factor 1 | MD16G1216900 | AT3G23240.1 | 4.7101 | ethylene-activated defence response to abiotic factors | |
| 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase superfamily protein | MD03G1140400 | AT4G10490.1 | 4.6868 | defense response to oomycetes, response to salicylic acid | [ |
| nitrate transporter 1.5 | MD02G1228800 | AT1G32450.1 | 4.4253 | response to nitrate/nitrate transport | [ |
| Pathogenesis-related thaumatin superfamily protein | MD17G1250000 | AT1G20030.2 | 4.4096 | oxidative stress response | [ |
| Eukaryotic aspartyl protease family protein | MD11G1287900 | AT1G03220.1 | 4.4009 | response to abiotic stress conditions | [ |
| Pathogenesis-related thaumatin superfamily protein | MD17G1249600 | AT1G20030.2 | 4.0734 | oxidative stress response | [ |
| Late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein family | MD06G1094100 | AT2G46150.1 | 3.944 | pathogen response | [ |
| expansin A1 | MD06G1195100 | AT1G69530.2 | 3.9284 | regulation of stomatal opening | [ |
| homolog of carrot EP3-3 chitinase | MD04G1047700 | AT3G54420.1 | 3.8788 | response to environmental stresses (cold, wounding, dehydration) | |
| expansin A4 | MD01G1135600 | AT2G39700.1 | 3.8372 | growth and development modulation | [ |
| cytochrome P450%2C family 72%2C subfamily A%2C polypeptide 9 | MD16G1056600 | AT3G14630.1 | 3.6968 | hydrolyzation of gibberellins | [ |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| UDP-Glycosyltransferase superfamily protein | MD17G1125800 | AT1G22400.1 | −5.0363 | plant growth and development | [ |
| Plant invertase/pectin methylesterase inhibitor superfamily | MD02G1207900 | AT2G45220.1 | −4.8852 | pathogen-induced pectin methylesterases activity and resistance against B. cinerea by triggering jasmonic acid–ethylene-dependent PDF1.2 (AT5G44420) expression | [ |
| ACC synthase 1 | MD01G1070400 | AT3G61510.1 | −4.4324 | ethylene biosynthetic process | [ |
| Cupredoxin superfamily protein | MD15G1328900 | AT4G39830.1 | −4.2877 | salt-stress tolerance | [ |
| NC domain-containing protein-like protein | MD01G1232800 | AT5G16360.1 | −4.1931 | unknown | |
| NAD(P)-linked oxidoreductase superfamily protein | MD12G1240300 | AT1G60690.1 | −4.1175 | unknown | |
| blue-copper-binding protein | MD02G1028300 | AT5G20230.1 | −4.1059 | response to cold/freezing | [ |
| cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase 7 | MD01G1042500 | AT4G37980.1 | −4.1012 | direct plant defense at wound sites | [ |
| 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (acc) synthase 6 | MD14G1111500 | AT4G11280.1 | −4.0773 | environmental stress responses | [ |
| phospholipase A 2A | MD15G1085800 | AT2G26560.1 | −4.0524 | response to dehydration | [ |
| ABC-2 and Plant PDR ABC-type transporter family protein | MD09G1204300 | AT1G59870.1 | −3.9073 | ccadmium stress tolerance | [ |
| Late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein family | MD07G1281600 | AT2G46150.1 | −3.8798 | pathogen response | [ |
| potassium transporter 1 | MD05G1223100 | AT2G30070.1 | −3.8791 | response to salt stress | [ |
| Late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein family | MD14G1114000 | AT2G46150.1 | −3.8079 | pathogen response | [ |
| NAD(P)-linked oxidoreductase superfamily protein | MD08G1240600 | AT1G60750.1 | −3.8033 | response to wounding | [ |
| S-adenosyl-L-methionine-dependent methyltransferases superfamily protein | MD08G1242800 | AT5G10830.1 | −3.7399 | ROS-induced cell death | [ |
| cytochrome P450%2C family 81%2C subfamily D%2C polypeptide 8 | MD03G1281500 | AT4G37370.1 | −3.6903 | response to heavy metal | [ |
| FAD-binding Berberine family protein | MD10G1244300 | AT4G20820.1 | −3.685 | oxidative stress response | [ |
| early nodulin-like protein 14 | MD02G1028800 | AT2G25060.1 | −3.6798 | male-female communication and fertilization | [ |
| UDP-glucosyl transferase 73B3 | MD07G1007400 | AT4G34131.1 | −3.6701 | regulation of redox status and general detoxification of ROS-reactive secondary metabolites | [ |
| SAUR-like auxin-responsive protein family | MD07G1117400 | AT3G60690.1 | −3.6455 | Auxin-responsive protein SAUR like | |
| calcium ATPase 2 | MD02G1185000 | AT4G37640.1 | −3.6231 | Ca2+ transport against concentration gradients using ATP | [ |
| Heavy metal transport/detoxification superfamily protein | MD10G1280500 | AT1G06330.1 | −3.5779 | response to heavy metal | [ |
| cellulose synthase like G1 | MD02G1095700 | AT4G24010.1 | −3.5496 | response to cold | [ |
| multidrug resistance-associated protein 3 | MD16G1109500 | AT3G13080.1 | −3.5382 | response to heavy metal | [ |
| blue-copper-binding protein | MD02G1028600 | AT5G20230.1 | −3.5213 | ROS and SA-synthesis-related genes expression regulation | [ |
Mean fresh weight and ripening parameters (starch content, sugar content (brix°), firmness and acidity) measured at harvest in the two experimental vintages 2019 and 2020 on the apples that have been used for the experiments.
| Mean Starch Content | Mean Fresh Weight | Sugars Brix | Firmness kg/cm2 | Acidity g/L mal.ac | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vintage 2019 | 2.1 | 212.2 | 9.7 | 8.4 | 9 |
| vintage 2020 | 2.0 | 189 | 10 | 8.1 | 7.9 |
Figure 8Experimental set-up for the 2D image acquisition of the whole apple surface area and for sampling of material. Wounding sites are evidenced by black spots to allow tracking. The picture was taken by acquiring the entire surface of the fruit by placing it onto a rotating platform and using reference points (evidenced by black boxes and lines located on the adaptor placed on top and bottom sides of the apple), enabling to point the start and end of the image acquisition, as evidenced by orange arrows. By using the reference points the wounded and unwounded (control) halves of the fruits could be precisely separated (evidenced by the boxed areas). This approach allowed acquisition of almost the entire fruit’s surface and for later analysis of the percentage of browned (scalded) versus green areas. On the right of the panel enlarged pictures of the wounded (red box) and of the non-wounded control (blue box) area are shown. The yellow dotted circles indicate the skin area that has been excised for sampling.
Primer sequences used for targeted Real-Time PCR expression analysis on MdACO and MdPPO, known as ripening marker genes, and of RNA-Seq identified DEGs. ACO, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase—ACC oxidase; PPO, Polyphenol oxidase; BCB, blue-copper-binding protein; EP3, Endochitinase EP3; 2OG, 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase superfamily protein; FAD7, fatty acid desaturase 7; MLP423, Major latex-like protein 423, LHCB6, light harvesting complex photosystem II subunit 6; LHCB4.2, light harvesting complex photosystem II subunit 4.2.
| Gene Bank Accession Number | Name | Primer fw | Primer rv | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB030859 | MdACO | CAGTCGGATGGGACCAGAA | GCTTGGAATTTCAGGCCAGA | Dal Cin et al., 2000 |
| L29450 | MdPPO | CTGACTCGGACTGGTTGGAC | CTTCGCTACTTTGCTCAATGC | this work |
| MD02G1028600 | BCB | TCCTCCAGCTGGCTCTGTTGC | GCTACTCTGTGTTCCCCGCTCC | this work |
| MD04G1047700 | EP3 | TGGCCTCCGATCCCGTCCTT | AGGGCAGGCTGTTTACCATCACA | this work |
| MD11G1074400 | 2OG | CCTCACACGGACAAGAATTTCACA | GCAGCCTCAATCCACTCGCC | this work |
| MD10G1299400 | unknown1 | CCACTGCCCGCGATTTACG | ACCAGAGTCGGGGGCTGATG | this work |
| MD11G1072300 | FAD7 | AGCAGCAGAGCAAGCCCATCAA | GGAGGGGCACTTGGGTCGAA | this work |
| MD13G1161200 | unknown2 | GAGCACCAGCCACTATCACACCAAG | GGTGGGAGGCCTTCTCTTTGC | this work |
| MD13G1161000 | unknown3 | TGGTGGCTTCCGGCAATGGT | GGTGGGAGGCCTTCTCTTTGC | this work |
| MD13G1160900 | MLP423 | CAGTCTGCGCTCCTGCTAGGTTG | TTCCAACACCTCCATCTCCCTCA | this work |
| MD15G1411600 | LHCB6 | GGCTCGATGGCTCGCTTCC | ACCACTTGAGGAACGCCGGG | this work |
| MD04G1151300 | LHCB4.2 | CCCCGTCGCACCTTAGCACA | GTAGGCGTCGGTCGGAAGGC | this work |