| Literature DB >> 34948149 |
Małgorzata Namiota1, Radosław Bonikowski1.
Abstract
Prolonging crops' shelf-life while retaining their high quality is a major issue related to postharvest management. During storage, fruits and vegetables are exposed to microbial attacks, which may cause spoilage. Crop deterioration causes the loss of physical properties and drops in quality and nutritional value. Hence, new techniques to improve the resistance of food products are being explored. One promising technique is fumigation. Essential oils and their constituents, due to their antimicrobial properties, are likely to be used as fumigants, as they are highly volatile, effective in low concentrations, biodegradable, and safe. Papers indicate that some of them can improve their quality by increasing the content of antioxidants. This comprehensive review aims to present the current state of knowledge about the influence of essential oil fumigation on crop quality. It covers antioxidant capacity, the content of some bioactive compounds, physicochemical properties, decay properties, and sensory attributes of fruits and vegetables treated with essential oil vapors. The review indicates that this technique might be an interesting field for further exploration due to the promising results presented in the studies. Moreover, the review presents major objectives for current studies and indicates a lack of recent papers in this field.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant; decay; postharvest storage; shelf-life; volatiles
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34948149 PMCID: PMC8708446 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413351
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Chemical formulae of some essential oils’ constituents.
Presentation of volatiles that enhanced quality of analyzed fruits in studies.
| Volatile | Parameter | Fruit | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methyl jasmonate | Total phenolics content ↑ | [ | |
| PPO, POD activity ↑ | [ | ||
| SOD activity ↑ | [ | ||
| Ascorbic acid content ↑ | [ | ||
| Decay incidence * ↓ | [ | ||
| Sensory attributes ↑ | [ | ||
| Decay severity ** ↓ | [ | ||
| Fructose, glucose, malic, and citric acids content ↑ | [ | ||
| Total carotenoids, lutein, β-carotene content ↑ | [ | ||
| Allyl | Firmness ↑ | [ | |
| Malic acid content ↑ | [ | ||
| Decay incidence * ↓ | [ | ||
| Glucose and fructose content ↑ | [ | ||
| 4-methoxy | Ascorbic acid content ↑ | [ | |
| Carvacrol | Total phenolics content ↑ | [ | |
| Decay incidence * ↓ | [ | ||
| Citric acid content ↑ | [ | ||
| POD, CAT, APX, SOD activity ↑ | [ | ||
| Anethole | Total phenolics content ↑ | [ | |
| Menthol | Total phenolics content ↑ | [ | |
| Decay incidence * ↓ | [ | ||
| Firmness ↑ | [ | ||
| Thymol | Total phenolics content ↑ | [ | |
| Ascorbic acid content ↑ | [ | ||
| Malic and citric acids content ↑ | [ | ||
| Decay incidence * ↓ | [ | ||
| Tartaric acid content ↑ | [ | ||
| Sensory attributes ↑ | [ | ||
| Firmness ↑ | [ | ||
| Weight loss ↓ | [ | ||
| Citral | Firmness ↑ | [ | |
| Cinnamic acid | Glucose content ↑ | [ | |
| Eugenol | Total phenolics content ↑ | [ | |
| Firmness ↑ | [ | ||
| Sensory attributes ↑ | [ | ||
| Decay incidence * ↓ | [ | ||
| Ascorbic acid content ↑ | [ | ||
| Malic and citric acid content ↑ | [ | ||
| Weight loss ↓ | [ | ||
| Fructose and glucose content ↑ | [ | ||
| Decay incidence ↓ | [ | ||
| Perillaldehyde | Total phenolics content ↑ | [ | |
| POD, CAT, APX activity ↑ | [ | ||
| Citric acid content ↑ | [ | ||
| Tea tree EO | Total phenolics content ↑ | [ | |
| Malic and citric acid content ↑ | [ | ||
| Decay incidence * ↓ | [ | ||
| Thyme EO | Total phenolics content ↑ | [ | |
| Decay incidence * ↓ | [ | ||
| Sensory attributes ↓ | [ | ||
| Sensory attributes ↑ | [ | ||
| Anthracnose severity and incidence ↓ | [ | ||
| Weight loss ↓ | [ | ||
| POD, SOD activity ↑ | [ | ||
| PPO activity ↑ | [ | ||
| [ | |||
| Ascorbic acid content ↑ | [ | ||
| Total carotenoids content ↑ | [ | ||
| Firmness ↑ | [ | ||
| Cinnamaldehyde | Total phenolics content ↑ | [ | |
| POD, CAT, APX activity ↑ | [ | ||
| PPO activity ↑ | [ | ||
| Ascorbic acid content ↑ | [ | ||
| Sensory attributes ↑ | [ | ||
| Firmness ↑ | [ | ||
| Citric acid content ↑ | [ | ||
| Cinnamon EO | Total phenolics content ↑ | [ | |
| Decay severity ** ↓ | [ | ||
| Sensory attributes ↓ | [ | ||
| Lavender EO | Firmness ↑ | [ | |
| Clove EO | Total phenolics content ↑ | [ | |
| Weight loss, percentage open caps ↓ | [ | ||
| Anthracnose severity and incidence ↓ | [ | ||
| APX, GR activity ↑ | [ | ||
| PPO activity ↑ | [ | ||
| Sensory attributes ↓ | [ | ||
| Ascorbic acid content ↑ | [ | ||
| Firmness ↑ | [ | ||
| Oregano EO | Ascorbic acid content ↑ | [ | |
| Decay incidence * ↓ | [ | ||
| Peppermint EO | Total phenolics content ↑ | [ | |
| Decay incidence * ↓ | [ | ||
| Anthracnose severity and incidence ↓ | [ | ||
| Firmness ↑ | [ | ||
| Weight loss ↓ | [ | ||
| Basil EO | Weight loss ↓ | [ | |
| Decay incidence * | [ | ||
| Anthracnose incidence ↓ | [ | ||
| Rosemary EO | Firmness ↑ | [ | |
| Garlic EO | Firmness ↑ | [ | |
| Savory EO | Ascorbic acid content ↑ | [ | |
| Weight loss ↓ | [ | ||
| Sensory attributes ↓ | [ | ||
| Decay incidence * ↓ | [ | ||
| Lemongrass EO | Decay incidence * ↓ | [ | |
| Citronella EO | Total phenolics content ↑ | [ | |
| Weight loss ↓ | [ | ||
| Goldenrod EO | Decay severity ** ↓ | [ |
↑ indicates the increase in this parameter due to treatment with volatiles. ↓ indicates the decrease in this parameter due to treatment with volatiles. * Decay incidence is expressed as the percentage of fruits showing decay symptoms, regardless of the term used in mentioned reference. ** Decay severity is expressed as the intensity of the decay visible on the fruits, regardless of the term used in mentioned reference.