| Literature DB >> 34947939 |
Jyh-Gang Leu1,2, Chien-Mei Wang3, Chao-Yi Chen4, Yi-Feng Yang4, Chin-Yu Shih4, Jiun-Tsai Lin5, Han-Min Chen3,4,5, Yao-Jen Liang4,5.
Abstract
Ischemia followed by blood supply reperfusion in cardiomyocytes leads to an overproduction of free radicals and a rapid decrease of adenosine triphosphate concentration. The cardioprotective effect of a potential drug, adenine, was evaluated using H9c2 rat cardiomyoblasts. After hypoxia-reoxygenation (HR) treatment consisting of hypoxia for 21 h followed by reoxygenation for 6 h, it was revealed that pretreatment with 200 µM adenine for 2 h effectively prevented HR-induced cell death. Adenine also significantly decreased the production of reactive oxygen species and reduced cell apoptosis after HR injury. The antioxidant effect of adenine was also revealed in this study. Adenine pretreatment significantly reduced the expression of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) proteins, and protein disulfide isomerase induced a protective effect on mitochondria after HR stimulation. Intracellular adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPARδ), and perilipin levels were increased by adenine after HR stimulation. Adenine had a protective effect in HR-damaged H9c2 cells. It may be used in multiple preventive medicines in the future.Entities:
Keywords: adenine; antioxidation; cell cycle; ischemia-reperfusion; myocardial infarction
Year: 2021 PMID: 34947939 PMCID: PMC8703696 DOI: 10.3390/life11121408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Figure 1Adenine treatment significantly affected cell numbers and cell viability after hypoxia–reoxygenation (HR). (A) HR significantly decreased the cell number in H9c2 cells. Pretreatment with 200 and 400 μM significantly attenuated the HR effects. (B) Pretreatment with 200 μM adenine 2 h but not 0.5 h before HR stimulation significantly reversed the HR-decreased cell numbers. (C) Pretreatment with adenine significantly reversed HR-decreased cell viability. (D) Treatment with 200 μM adenine alone did not increase the cell viability. Treatment with adenine after HR stimulation for 0.5 h did not increase the viability. Each value represents the mean ± SEM; n = 6 for each group. * p < 0.05 when compared to control group; ** p < 0.01 when compared to control; # p < 0.05 when compared to HR group.
Figure 2Effects of adenine on hypoxia–reoxygenation (HR)-induced ROS/superoxide in H9c2 cells. (A) HR significantly increased ROS production. Pretreatment with 200 μM adenine significantly decreased the productions. (B) Pretreatment with adenine reversed the HR-induced superoxide but did not reach statical significance. (C) HR significantly decreased GSH production, and pretreated adenine significantly reversed the effects. Each value represents the mean ± SEM; n = 6 for each group. ** p < 0.01 when compared to control; # p < 0.05 when compared to HR group.
Figure 3Cell apoptosis detection and endoplasmic reticulum stress protein expression after hypoxia–reoxygenation (HR) treatment and adenine pretreatment. (A) Quantification from repeated PI-FITC staining experiments; pretreatment with 200 μM adenine significantly reversed HR-decreased H9c2 cell viability. (B) Adenine pretreatment significantly decreased the HR-induced ATF4 and PDI protein expressions in H9c2 cells. Metformin (MF) serves as a comparable control. Each value represents the mean ± SEM; n = 6 for each group. ** p < 0.01 when compared to control; # p < 0.05 when compared to HR group, ## p < 0.01 when compared to HR group.
Figure 4Adenine effects on AMPK and PPARδ expressions after hypoxia–reoxygenation (HR). (A) Pretreatment with 200 μM adenine significantly reversed the HR-decreased ratio of phosphorylation AMPK and total AMPK protein expressions. (B) HR treatment significantly decreased PPARδ and downstream perilipin protein expressions, and pretreatment with adenine or metformin significantly increased PPARδ and perilipin expressions after HR stimulation, respectively. Each value represents the mean ± SEM; n = 6 for each group. * p < 0.05 when compared to control; # p < 0.05 when compared to HR group.