Literature DB >> 3494749

Relation between geometric dimensions of coronary artery stenoses and myocardial perfusion reserve in man.

R A Goldstein, R L Kirkeeide, L L Demer, M Merhige, A Nishikawa, R W Smalling, N A Mullani, K L Gould.   

Abstract

To determine the relation between stenosis anatomy and perfusion in man, 31 patients had quantitative coronary arteriography and positron imaging (PET) with Rb-82 or N-13 ammonia at rest and after dipyridamole-handgrip stress. 10 patients were also studied after angioplasty (total stenoses = 41). Percent narrowing and absolute cross-sectional luminal area were related through a quadratic function to myocardial perfusion reserve determined with PET. Arteriographically determined coronary flow reserve was linearly related to relative myocardial perfusion reserve as expected, based on the derivation of equations for stenosis flow reserve. All of the correlations had considerable scatter, indicating that no single measurement derived by coronary arteriography was a good indicator of perfusion reserve by PET in individual patients. This study provides the relation between all anatomic dimensions of coronary artery stenoses and myocardial perfusion reserve in man, and suggests that PET indicates the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses for clinical purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3494749      PMCID: PMC424422          DOI: 10.1172/JCI112976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  14 in total

1.  Effect of geometry on pressure losses across models of arterial stenoses.

Authors:  B D Seeley; D F Young
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance.

Authors:  K L Gould; K Lipscomb
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  K L Gould; K Lipscomb; G W Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82. I. Measurement of extraction fraction and flow with external detectors.

Authors:  N A Mullani; R A Goldstein; K L Gould; S K Marani; D J Fisher; H A O'Brien; M D Loberg
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Regional myocardial perfusion assessed with N-13 labeled ammonia and positron emission computerized axial tomography.

Authors:  H R Schelbert; M E Phelps; E J Hoffman; S C Huang; C E Selin; D E Kuhl
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. I. Physiologic basis and experimental validation.

Authors:  K L Gould
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82. II. Effects of metabolic and pharmacologic interventions.

Authors:  R A Goldstein; N A Mullani; S K Marani; D J Fisher; K L Gould; H A O'Brien
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  The value of lesion cross-sectional area determined by quantitative coronary angiography in assessing the physiologic significance of proximal left anterior descending coronary arterial stenoses.

Authors:  D G Harrison; C W White; L F Hiratzka; D B Doty; D H Barnes; C L Eastham; M L Marcus
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VII. Validation of coronary flow reserve as a single integrated functional measure of stenosis severity reflecting all its geometric dimensions.

Authors:  R L Kirkeeide; K L Gould; L Parsel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VIII. Clinical feasibility of positron cardiac imaging without a cyclotron using generator-produced rubidium-82.

Authors:  K L Gould; R A Goldstein; N A Mullani; R L Kirkeeide; W H Wong; T J Tewson; M S Berridge; L A Bolomey; R K Hartz; R W Smalling
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  21 in total

1.  3D assessment of myocardial perfusion parameter combined with 3D reconstructed coronary artery tree from digital coronary angiograms.

Authors:  T H Schindler; N Magosaki; M Jeserich; E Nitzsche; U Oser; T Abdollahnia; M Nageleisen; M Zehender; H Just; U Solzbach
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  2000-02

2.  Fusion imaging: combined visualization of 3D reconstructed coronary artery tree and 3D myocardial scintigraphic image in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T H Schindler; N Magosaki; M Jeserich; U Oser; T Krause; R Fischer; E Moser; E Nitzsche; M Zehender; H Just; U Solzbach
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-10

3.  Method for percutaneously introducing, and removing, anatomical stenosis of predetermined severity in vivo: the "stenotic stent".

Authors:  Nicolas Foin; Sayan Sen; Ricardo Petraco; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Ryo Torii; Chrysa Kousera; Christopher Broyd; Vikram Mehta; Yun Xu; Jamil Mayet; Alun Hughes; Carlo Di Mario; Rob Krams; Darrel Francis; Justin Davies
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Incremental prognostic value of coronary flow reserve assessed with single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Robert A Dekemp; Mikael Trottier; Rob S B Beanlands
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  PET in clinical cardiology: can we already swim?

Authors:  J A Blokland; E K Pauwels; E E van der Wall
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

6.  Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: does coronary pressure never lie?

Authors:  Tim P van de Hoef; Martijn A van Lavieren; José P S Henriques; Jan J Piek; Bimmer E P M Claessen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

Review 7.  [Examination of myocardial perfusion with positron emission tomography: a clinically useful and valid method?].

Authors:  J vom Dahl
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.443

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment.

Authors:  Federico E Mordini; Tariq Haddad; Li-Yueh Hsu; Peter Kellman; Tracy B Lowrey; Anthony H Aletras; W Patricia Bandettini; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01

Review 9.  Clinical cardiac PET using generator-produced Rb-82: a review.

Authors:  K L Gould
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 10.  Adequate patient selection for coronary revascularization: an overview of current methods used in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Steven A J Chamuleau; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit; Martijn Meuwissen; Jan J Piek
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.