| Literature DB >> 34947474 |
Chenggong Chang1,2,3, Lingyun An4, Weixin Zheng2,3, Jing Wen2,3, Jinmei Dong2,3, Fengyun Yan1, Xueying Xiao2,3.
Abstract
Aiming at the problem that ordinary cement concrete is subjected to damage in heavy saline soil areas in China, a new type of magnesium oxychloride cement concrete is prepared by using the gelling properties of magnesium oxychloride cement in this study, and the erosion resistance of the synthesized magnesium oxychloride cement concrete in concentrated brine of salt lakes is studied through the full immersion test. The effects of concentrated brine of salt lakes on the macroscopic, microscopic morphology, phase composition and mechanical properties of magnesium oxychloride cement concrete are investigated by means of macro-morphology, erosion depth, SEM, XRD and strength changes. The salt erosion resistance mechanism of magnesium oxychloride cement concrete is revealed. The results demonstrate that under the environment of full immersion in concentrated brine of salt lakes, there is no macroscopic phenomenon of concrete damage due to salt crystallization, and the main phase composition is basically unchanged. The microscopic morphology mostly changes from needle-rod-like to gel-like. Due to the formation of a new 5·1·8 phase on the surface layer and the increase in compactness, its compressive strength has a gradual increase trend. Based on the engineering application of magnesium oxychloride cement concrete, it is further confirmed that magnesium oxychloride cement concrete has excellent salt erosion resistance and good weather resistance, which provides theoretical support for future popularization and application.Entities:
Keywords: magnesium oxychloride cement concrete; mechanical property; microscopic morphology; phase composition; salt erosion resistance
Year: 2021 PMID: 34947474 PMCID: PMC8704459 DOI: 10.3390/ma14247880
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition of bischofite.
| Composition | MgCl2 | NaCl | MgSO4 | KCl | CaCl2 | Water Insoluble Matter | H2O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content (wt.%) | 44.90 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 51.04 |
Chemical composition of light burned magnesia.
| Composition | MgO | MgCO3 | CaCO3 | f-CaO | Acid Insoluble Matter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content (wt.%) | 69.52 | 19.80 | 1.34 | 0.38 | 8.41 |
Chemical composition/(wt.%) of concentrated brine of salt lakes.
| Composition | K+ | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | Na+ | Fe3+ | Al3+ | Cl− | SO42− | HCO3− |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content (g/L) | 0.62 | 0.49 | 113.0 | 1.99 | 0.007 | 0.012 | 342.88 | 0.651 | 1.916 |
Chemical composition/(wt.%) of fly ash.
| Composition | SiO2 | Al2O3 | K2O | CaO | Fe2O3 | TiO | MgO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content (wt.%) | 40.04 | 41.87 | 3.29 | 1.49 | 9.68 | 0.95 | 0.74 |
Mixture ratio of MOCC.
| Raw Materials | Light Burned Magnesia | Sand | Crushed Stone | Fly Ash | 23.5% of Mass FractionSolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality/Kg | 12 | 40 | 63 | 1.8 | 7.9 |
Figure 1The experiments process of MOCC.
Figure 2Macro morphology of MOCC (a) before and (b,c) after immersion in concentrated brine of salt lakes for 12 months. Among them, (c) is the case that MOCC presented in (b) is taken out from concentrated brine of salt lakes.
Figure 3Microscopic morphology of MOCC (a–c) before and (d–f) after immersion in concentrated brine of salt lake for different months.
Figure 4XRD patterns of MOCC (a) before and (b) after immersion in concentrated brine of salt lake for different months.
Erosion depth of MOCC immersed in concentrated brine of salt lake for different months.
| Soaking Time/Month | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 |
| Erosion depth/mm | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Figure 5Mechanical properties of MOCC before and after immersion in concentrated brine of salt lake for different months.
Figure 6MOCC pavement and tracking sample (a) during construction process; (b) cured for 12 months; (c) cross section of tracking sample.
Compressive strength of tracking sample of MOCC.
| Time/Month | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compressive strength/MPa | 33.8 | 35.6 | 37.2 | 37.8 | 38.4 |
Figure 7Microscopic morphology of tracking sample of MOCC for different months (a). 1 month (b). 6 months (c). 12 months.
Figure 8XRD patterns of tracking sample of MOCC for different months.