| Literature DB >> 34947471 |
Mohamed Elsafi1, Mirvat Fawzi Dib1, Hoda Ezzelddin Mustafa2, M I Sayyed3,4, Mayeen Uddin Khandaker5, Abdullah Alsubaie6, Abdulraheem S A Almalki7, Mahmoud I Abbas1, Ahmed M El-Khatib1.
Abstract
We prepared red clays by introducing different percentages of PbO, Bi2O3, and CdO. In order to understand how the introduction of these oxides into red clay influences its attenuation ability, the mass attenuation coefficient of the clays was experimentally measured in a lab using an HPGe detector. The theoretical shielding capability of the material present was obtained using XCOM to verify the accuracy of the experimental results. We found that the experimental and theoretical values agree to a very high degree of precision. The effective atomic number (Zeff) of pure red clay, and red clay with the three metal oxides was determined. The pure red clay had the lowest Zeff of the tested samples, which means that introducing any of these three oxides into the clay will greatly enhance its Zeff, and consequently its attenuation capability. Additionally, the Zeff for red clay with 10 wt% CdO is lower than the Zeff of red clay with 10 wt% Bi2O3 and PbO. We also prepared red clay using 10 wt% CdO nanoparticles and compared its attenuation ability with the red clay prepared with 10 wt% PbO, Bi2O3, and CdO microparticles. We found that the MAC of the red clay with 10 wt% nano-CdO was higher than the MAC of the clay with microparticle samples. Accordingly, nanoparticles could be a useful way to enhance the shielding ability of current radiation shielding materials.Entities:
Keywords: MAC; Zeff; bulk metal oxides; nano-CdO; red clay
Year: 2021 PMID: 34947471 PMCID: PMC8703634 DOI: 10.3390/ma14247878
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition and densities of prepared ceramic-based red clay samples.
| Sample | Weight Percentage (%) | Density (g·cm−3) | Weight Fraction of Elements (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | O | Si | Ti | Fe | Pb | Bi | Cd | |||
| Red clay (R.C) | 100 | 1.982 ± 0.005 | 18,036 | 49,132 | 27,238 | 1.186 | 4.407 | - | - | - |
| R.C + PbO | 90:10 | 2.151 ± 0.003 | 16,232 | 44,932 | 24,512 | 1.067 | 3.964 | 9.283 | - | - |
| R.C + PbO | 70:30 | 2.602 ± 0.018 | 12,628 | 36,547 | 19,067 | 0.833 | 3.085 | 27.849 | - | - |
| R.C + Bi2O3 | 90:10 | 2.150 ± 0.012 | 16,232 | 45,245 | 24.,512 | 1.068 | 3.964 | - | 8.970 | - |
| R.C + Bi2O3 | 70:30 | 2.147 ± 0.005 | 12,627 | 37,487 | 19,068 | 0.833 | 3.086 | 26.910 | ||
| R.C + CdO | 90:10 | 2.562 ± 0.008 | 16,232 | 45,460 | 24,512 | 1.066 | 3.964 | - | - | 8.754 |
| R.C + CdO NPs | 90:10 | 2.152 ± 0.017 | 16,320 | 45,372 | 24,475 | 1.054 | 3.976 | - | - | 8.791 |
| R.C + CdO | 70:30 | 2.565 ± 0.004 | 12,628 | 38,134 | 19,067 | 0.833 | 3.086 | - | - | 26,262 |
| R.C + CdO NPs | 70:30 | 2.599 ± 0.020 | 12,522 | 38,152 | 19,004 | 0.835 | 3.087 | - | - | 26,398 |
| R.C + PbO + Bi2O3 + CdO | 70:10:10:10 | 2.581 ± 0.011 | 12,628 | 37,389 | 19,067 | 0.833 | 3.086 | 9.283 | 8.969 | 8.754 |
The activities and other specifications for point sources that are used in this study.
| PTB Nuclide | Energy (keV) | Emission Probability | Initial Activity (kBq) | Reference Date | Uncertainty (kBq) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Am-241 | 59.52 | 35.9 | 259 | 1 January 2009 | ±2.6 |
| Ba-133 | 80.99 | 34.1 | 275.3 | ±2.8 | |
| 356.21 | 21.4 | ||||
| Cs-137 | 661.66 | 34.1 | 385 | ±4.0 | |
| Co-60 | 1173.23 | 99.9 | 212.1 | ±1.5 | |
| 1332.50 | 99.982 |
Figure 1The schematic diagram of the experimental setup for the narrow-beam method.
Figure 2The MAC as a function of energy ranging from 0.015–15 MeV for different micro-samples calculated by XCOM software.
Figure 3The difference between the experimental and XCOM results of (a) MAC at 0.0596 MeV, (b) LAC at 0.356 MeV, (c) HVL at 0.662 MeV and (d) MFP at 1.173 MeV for red clay, as well as different 10% wt doped oxide-clays.
Figure 4The difference between the experimental and XCOM results of (a) MAC at 0.0596 MeV, (b) LAC at 0.356 MeV, (c) HVL at 0.662 MeV and (d) TVL at 1.173 MeV for different 30% wt doped oxide-clays.
Figure 5The effective atomic number as a function of energy, (a) Z of pure redl-clay as well as same the clay filled with 10%wt different oxides, and (b) Z of ball-clay filled with 30%wt different oxides.
Figure 6(a,b) The MAC for red clay filled with 10 wt% of different micro-oxides and 10 wt% CdO nanoparticles.
Figure 7The HVL of the studied materials compared with ordinary concrete and white casting mud.