| Literature DB >> 34946965 |
Tingyan Hu1, Sainan Huang1, Xiaoyang Lv2, Shanhe Wang1, Tesfaye Getachew3, Joram M Mwacharo3, Aynalem Haile3, Wei Sun1,2.
Abstract
Wool curvature is the determining factor for lambskin quality of Hu lambs. However, the molecular mechanism of wool curvature formation is not yet known. miRNA has been proved to play an important role in hair follicle development, and we have discovered a differentially expressed miRNA, miR-143, in hair follicles of different curl levels. In this study, we first examined the effects of miR-143 on the proliferation and cell cycle of dermal papilla cells using CCK8, EdU and flow cytometry and showed that miR-143 inhibited the proliferation of dermal papilla cells and slowed down the cell cycle. Bioinformatics analysis was performed to predict the target genes KRT71 and CUX1 of miR-143, and both two genes were expressed at significantly higher levels in small waves than in straight lambskin wool (p < 0.05) as detected by qPCR and Western blot (WB). Then, the target relationships between miR-143 and KRT71 and CUX1 were verified through the dual-luciferase assay in 293T cells. Finally, after overexpression and suppression of miR-143 in dermal papilla cells, the expression trend of CUX1 was contrary to that of miR-143. Meanwhile, KRT71 was not detected because KRT71 was not expressed in dermal papilla cells. Therefore, we speculated that miR-143 can target CUX1 to inhibit the proliferation of dermal papilla cells, while miR-143 can target KRT71 to regulate the growth and development of hair follicles, so as to affect the development of hair follicles and ultimately affect the formation of wool curvature.Entities:
Keywords: CUX1; KRT71; dermal papilla cell; miR-143; proliferation; wool curvature
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34946965 PMCID: PMC8700861 DOI: 10.3390/genes12122017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
The primer information of qRT-PCR.
| Gene/miRNA Name | Forward Primer (5′-3′) | Reverse Primer (5′-3′) | Product Length (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| GCACGACATTGAGACGGAG | AGCTATGGTCTCAGCCTGGT | 160 |
|
| GGCTCATCCAGAGAATCCGC | GAGCATTGTCACCCCTCTGT | 102 |
|
| TCTCAAGGGCATTCTAGGCTAC | GCCGAATTCATTGTCGTACCAG | 151 |
|
| AGAAGTGGCTGCATCACAAG | TCTCAGAATCTCCAGGGAATAG | 92 |
|
| CGAGGGCTTCGACACTTAC | GTCTTCATTGCCAGCACATT | 97 |
| Cyclin d1 | CCGAGGAGAACAAGCAGATC | GAGGGTGGGTTGGAAATG | 91 |
| miR-143 | CGCGTGAGATGAAGCACTG | AGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATT | variable |
| U6 | CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT | 95 |
The primer for construction of vector.
| Gene Name | Primer | Forward Primer (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
|
| CCctcgagCCATCTCCCTTTAAAGAGGG | |
| TTgcggccgcGACTTAGAGCTCGCTGTCC | ||
|
| CCctcgagTTGTCCCAGCTCCTGCTT | |
| TTgcggccgcTATTGAGGATGCAG | ||
|
| CTTGGGGACAGAGACC | |
| CAGTGTCACAGC | ||
|
| GGGAAGAGGAGGCCC | |
| GAAAGGAGAA |
Note: In the wild type, lowercase nucleotides indicate restriction enzyme sites. However, in the mutant type, the underlined nucleotide is the binding site for KRT71, CUX1 to miR-143, and the bolded nucleotide indicates the mutation site.
Figure 1The expression level of miR-143 (A) in small waves and straight wool, the CCK-8 results (B) after transfection of the miR-143 mimic and NC, and the CCK-8 results (C) after transfection of the miR-143 inhibotor and NC. * p < 0.05 or ** p < 0.01.
Figure 2miR-143 suppressing dermal papilla cells’ proliferation: (A) The cell cycle assay and (B) EdU assay after transfection of the miR-143 mimic and inhibitor. The short red lines in each picture represent 50 μm (C) The count of proliferating cells. (D,E) The relative expression level of CDK2, PCNA and cyclin d1. * p < 0.05 or ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3Target validation between miR-143 and KRT71 and CUX1: (A) Target gene prediction of miR-143. (B) The transfection efficiency verification of miR-143 mimic and inhibitor in dermal papilla cells. (C,D) The dual-luciferase assay between miR-143 and KRT71 and miR-143 and CUX1 in 293T cell. (E) Overexpression and inhibition of miR-143 in dermal papilla cells. (F) Detection of CUX1 protein expression level. * p < 0.05 or ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4The expression levels of CUX1 and KRT71 in small waves and straight wool group. (A) The relative mRNA expression levels of CUX1 were significantly higher in small waves group, as indicated by qRT-PCR. (B) The relative mRNA expression levels of KRT71 were significantly higher in small waves group, as indicated by qRT-PCR. (C–E) The protein expression levels of CUX1 and KRT71 in small waves group were higher than those in straight wool, as indicated byWestern blot. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.