| Literature DB >> 34946858 |
Juan Zhong1, Jianping Xu2, Ping Zhang1.
Abstract
Amanita exitialis is a poisonous mushroom and has caused many deaths in southern China. In this study, we collected 118 fruiting bodies of A. exitialis from seven different sites in Guangdong Province in southern China and investigated their genetic relationships using 14 polymorphic molecular markers. These 14 markers grouped the 118 fruiting bodies into 20 multilocus genotypes. Among these 20 genotypes, eight were each found only once while the remaining 12 were each represented by two to 54 fruiting bodies. Interestingly, among the 12 shared genotypes, four were shared between/among local populations that were separated by as far as over 80 km, a result consistent with secondary homothallic reproduction and long-distance spore dispersal. Despite the observed gene flow, significant genetic differentiations were found among the local populations, primarily due to the over-representation of certain genotypes within individual local populations. STRUCTURE analyses revealed that the 118 fruiting bodies belonged to three genetic clusters, consistent with divergence within this species in this geographic region. Interestingly, we found an excess of heterozygous individuals at both the local and the total sample level, suggesting potential inbreeding depression and heterozygous advantage in these populations of A. exitialis. We discuss the implications of our results for understanding the life cycle, dispersal, and evolution of this poisonous mushroom.Entities:
Keywords: AMOVA; Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; Mantel test; SNP markers; genetic clustering; genetic individual; heterozygosity; lethal mushroom; population genetics; secondary homothallism
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34946858 PMCID: PMC8701279 DOI: 10.3390/genes12121907
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1The basidiocarps of A. exitialis.
Amanita exitialis sample collection information.
| Code | City | Location | Sample Size | Latitude | Longitude | Altitude (above Sea Level) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Guangzhou | Duguting, Baiyunshan Mountain | 36 | 23.1674292 | 113.2971586 | 200–300 m |
| B | Guangzhou | Guangzhou University of Foreign Studies | 4 | 23.1986838 | 113.2989164 | 0–50 m |
| C | Guangzhou | South China Agricultural University | 27 | 23.1557492 | 113.3600235 | 0–50 m |
| D | Guangzhou | Guangzhou Tianluhu Forest Park | 6 | 23.2227467 | 113.4248414 | 200–300 m |
| E | Guangzhou | South China Botanical Garden | 8 | 23.1788847 | 113.3622869 | 0–50 m |
| F | Guangzhou | BeeWorld, Baiyunshan District | 22 | 23.1963429 | 113.2928271 | 100–200 m |
| G | Shenzhen | Fenghuangshan Forest Park | 15 | 22.6742000 | 113.8488670 | 100–200 m |
Figure 2Distributions of multilocus genotypes within and among the seven collection sites. Sub-figures A to G illustrate the spatial distribution of individual fruiting bodies and their multilocus genotypes in site A to G. Filled circles of the color represent the same multilocus genotype: site A contains 36 fruiting bodies belonging to nine genotypes; site B contains four fruiting bodies belonging to one genotype; site C contains 27 fruiting bodies belonging to seven genotypes; site D contains six fruiting bodies belonging to four genotypes; site E contains eight fruiting bodies belonging to three genotypes; site F contains 22 fruiting bodies belonging to four genotypes; and site G contains 15 fruiting bodies belonging to three genotypes. The geographic location of sites A to G are shown in Table 1.
AMOVA of genetic variation among seven populations of A. exitialis.
| Source of Variation | d.f. | Sum of Squares | Variance Components | Percentage of Variation (%) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among-population | 6 | 71.906 | 11.984 | 19% | 0.191 *** | 1.056 |
| Within-population | 111 | 282.780 | 2.548 | 81% | ||
| Total | 117 | 354.686 | 100% |
*** p < 0.01.
Figure 3Mantel test between genetic distance and geographic distance among the A. exitialis populations.
Figure 4Locations and genetic structure of seven populations of A. exitialis. STRUCTURE clustering analysis results based on their geographic distribution on the left. Codes of the populations are given in Table 1.
Figure 5(a). Dendrogram obtained for the 118 A. exitialis fruiting bodies based on their genetic distance; (b). The hierarchical clustering results of 118 A. exitialis fruiting bodies based on principal component analyses.
Chi-Square Tests for Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium using the total A. exitialis sample.
| Locus | Observed Heterozygotes | Expected Heterozygotes | Chi-Square Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| M12 | 73 | 49.640 | 21.849 *** |
| C21 | 106 | 59.000 | 74.881 *** |
| H11-300 | 64 | 53.809 | 5.104 * |
| A31-88 | 0 | 5.847 | 118.000 *** |
| A31-138 | 0 | 1.983 | 118.000 *** |
| A31-425 | 3 | 46.182 | 103.167 *** |
| A31-440 | 71 | 55.436 | 9.301 ** |
| G24-106 | 6 | 11.390 | 26.424 *** |
| G24-163 | 41 | 33.877 | 5.217 * |
| G24-489 | 77 | 51.877 | 27.674 *** |
| G24-600 | 106 | 58.390 | 78.453 *** |
| G24-615 | 5 | 10.487 | 32.305 *** |
| K47-355 | 103 | 58.962 | 65.826 *** |
| K47-556 | 103 | 58.962 | 65.826 *** |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 6A proposed model for the most likely mode of reproduction for A. exitialis in nature.
Figure 7Detection of gene flows among A. exitialis populations by TreeMix analysis.