| Literature DB >> 34946675 |
Nicola Zerbinati1, Sabrina Sommatis2, Cristina Maccario2, Serena Di Francesco2, Maria Chiara Capillo2, Giulia Grimaldi2, Raffaele Rauso3, Martha Herrera4, Pier Luca Bencini5, Roberto Mocchi2.
Abstract
(1) Background: Cosmeceuticals are topical products applied to human skin to prevent skin ageing and maintain a healthy skin appearance. Their effectiveness is closely linked to the compounds present in a final formulation. In this article, we propose a panel of in vitro tests to support the efficacy assessment of an anti-ageing cream enriched with functional compounds. (2)Entities:
Keywords: 3D model; MMP-1; anti-ageing; ceramides; collagen; cosmeceuticals; elastin; in vitro; safety; skin irritation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34946675 PMCID: PMC8708483 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26247592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Cell viability (%) of HaCaT cells (in blue) and NHDF cells (in orange) after treatment with different concentrations of the cream (range between 0.312 and 5 mg/mL) with respect to untreated cells (n = 2; replicates = 3).
Figure 2(a) Collagen levels and (b) elastin levels expressed as concentration (µg/mL) after treatment with the tested cream (0.625 and 1.25 mg/mL) in NHDF cells. * p values ≤ 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant compared with untreated cells (n = 3; replicates = 2).
Figure 3Quantitative analysis of IL-6 levels (pg/mL) after treatment with the cosmetic cream at the concentrations of 1.25 and 2.5 mg/mL and stimulation with TNF-α; Ctrl (−): untreated cells; Ctrl (+): cells treated only with TNF-α. * p values ≤0.05 and *** p values ≤ 0.001 were considered to be statistically significant compared with respective controls (n = 2; replicates = 2).
Figure 4Quantitative analysis of MMP-1 levels (ng/mL) after treatment with the cosmetic cream at the concentrations of 1.25 and 2.5 mg/mL. Ctrl (−): untreated cells; UVB (+): irradiated cells. * p values ≤0.05 and ** p values ≤ 0.01 were considered to be statistically significant compared with irradiated cells (n = 2; replicates = 2).
Figure 5(a) Cell viability expressed as a percentage (%) of RHE treated with Ceramide Shield Cream. Ctrl (−): RHE treated with DPBS; Ctrl (+): RHE treated with SDS as the irritating stimulus. (b) IL-1α amount (IU/mL) in the medium after treatment with Ceramide Shield Cream; Ctrl (−): cells treated with DPBS; Ctrl (+): RHE treated with SDS. Values of *** p ≤ 0.001 were considered statistically significant compared with Ctrl (−) by one-way ANOVA statistical analysis followed by Fisher’s LSD test.
Figure 6Cell viability expressed as a percentage (%) of HCE treated with Ceramide Shield Cream. Ctrl (−): HCE treated with DPBS; Ctrl (+): HCE treated with SDS as the irritating stimulus.
Functional classification of ingredients contained in the cream used in the study.
| Function | Ingredients |
|---|---|
| Humectant | Propanediol, Glycerin, Caprylyl Glycol, Acetyl Heptapeptide-4 |
| Emollient | Dimethicone, Cholesterol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Caprylyl Glycol, Glyceryl Caprylate, Glycine Soja Oil, Glycerin |
| Emulsifier | Carbomer, Sodium lauroyl lactylate, Xanthan gum, Sorbitan Stearate, Sorbityl 1-laurate, Polysorbate 20, Glyceryl Caprylate, Sodium oleate, Hydrogenated Lecithin, Cholesterol |
| Solvent | Aqua, Ethanol |
| Antimicrobic | Ethanol |
| Skin conditioning | Ceramide 3, Phytosphingosine, Ceramide 6 II, Ceramide 1, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Butyrospermum Parkii Butter, Glycyrrhizic acid, |
| Preservative & Perfume | Alcohol, Phenoxyethanol, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride |
| Chelating Agent | Disodium EDTA |
| Surfactant | Sorbityl Laurate, Polysorbate 20, Sodium Oleate |
| Film Forming | Polyisobutene |