| Literature DB >> 34945566 |
Michela Costantini1, Martins Sabovics2, Ruta Galoburda2, Tatjana Kince2, Evita Straumite2, Carmine Summo1, Antonella Pasqualone1.
Abstract
Legumes are not valued by all consumers, mostly due to the prolonged soaking and cooking process they require. This problem could be solved by preparing legume-based ready-to-eat snacks. In this study, the effect of two different dies (circular and star-shaped, with cross-sections of 19.6 and 35.9 mm2, respectively) on the physico-chemical properties, anti-nutritional compounds, and sensory features of extruded breakfast snacks was determined. Extruded products were obtained from 100% legume flours of red lentil, faba bean, brown pea, and common bean. The extrusion-cooking conditions were 2.5 g/s feed rate; 160 ± 1 °C die temperature; 16 ± 1 g/100 g feed moisture, and 230 rpm screw speed. Star-shaped extrudates showed a lower expansion ratio, degree of starch gelatinization, and water solubility index, as well as higher bulk density, hardness, crunchiness, and lightness (L*) values. The oligosaccharides showed non univocal variations by changing the die, whereas phytates did not vary at all. The extrudates from lentil flour (richer in fiber) were the least preferred by sensory panelists, due to their hard texture. However, the spherical extrudates were preferred over the star-shaped product. These results emphasize the possibility of improving the physico-chemical and sensory properties of legume extrudates by selecting a proper die.Entities:
Keywords: extruder die; extrusion-cooking; legumes; oligosaccharides; phytates; texture profile
Year: 2021 PMID: 34945566 PMCID: PMC8701229 DOI: 10.3390/foods10123015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Proximate composition and energy value of red lentil, faba bean, brown pea and common bean flours. All values are expressed on fresh matter.
| Red Lentil | Faba Bean | Brown Pea | Common Bean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fats (g/100 g) | 1.10 | 1.39 | 1.97 | 1.51 |
| Carbohydrates (g/100 g) | 29.50 | 58.90 | 47.80 | 49.88 |
| Total dietary fibers (g/100 g) | 30.50 | 8.40 | 10.50 | 15.50 |
| Proteins (g/100 g) | 25.80 | 17.80 | 25.10 | 21.40 |
| Energy value (kcal/100 g) | 292.10 | 336.00 | 330.00 | 329.71 |
Figure 1Circular (a) and star-shaped (b) dies used in the experimental trials.
Figure 2Color of the legume-based extrudates. From left to right: flours and ground extrudates of red lentil (1), faba bean (2), brown pea (3), and common bean (4). The letter “a” indicates the flours and the letters “b” and “c” indicate ground spherical and star-shaped extruded products, respectively.
Color parameters (mean ± standard deviation, n = 5) of flours of red lentil, faba bean, brown pea, and common bean.
| Red Lentil | Faba Bean | Brown Pea | Common Bean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 84.79 ± 0.36 c | 87.56 ± 0.03 b | 87.85 ± 0.31 b | 89.12 ± 0.37 a |
|
| 9.45 ± 0.12 a | −0.49 ± 0.03 b | −0.75 ± 0.03 c | −0.56 ± 0.02 b |
|
| 21.85 ± 0.25 a | 14.50 ± 0.05 b | 13.16 ± 0.02 c | 12.93 ± 0.04 c |
Different letters in the rows indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among legume flour.
Anti-nutritional compounds (mean ± standard deviation, n = 3) of flours of red lentil, faba bean, brown pea, and common bean.
| Red Lentil | Faba Bean | Brown Pea | Common Bean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phytates (mg phytic acid/g d.m.) | 3.49 ± 0.09 d | 7.51 ± 0.09 b | 4.69 ± 0.02 c | 9.09 ± 0.11 a |
| Verbascose (mg/g d.m.) | 16.09 ± 0.09 b | 12.74 ± 0.10 c | 29.66 ± 0.23 a | 12.65 ± 0.40 c |
| Stachyose (mg/g d.m.) | 28.89 ± 0.67 c | 39.32 ± 1.11 a | 19.16 ± 0.85 d | 35.37 ± 0.98 b |
| Raffinose (mg/g d.m.) | 16.28 ± 0.68 a | 2.80 ± 0.14 d | 10.10 ± 0.88 b | 5.99 ± 0.43 c |
Different letters in the rows indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among legume flour.
Physico-chemical parameters (mean ± standard deviation) of spherical and star-shaped extruded products obtained from different legume flours (n = 5 for BD; n = 10 for ER; n = 3 for the other parameters).
| Die Configuration | Legume | Physico-Chemical Parameter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BD | ER | WAI | WSI | DG | ||
| Spherical | Red lentil | 0.41 ± 0.01 b | 2.10 ± 0.22 c | 3.83 ± 0.18 a | 9.32 ± 0.30 d | 95.21 ± 0.63 c |
| Faba bean | 0.21 ± 0.02 d | 2.46 ± 0.09 b | 3.22 ± 0.05 b | 16.79 ± 0.25 a | 98.29 ± 0.20 a | |
| Brown pea | 0.21 ± 0.00 d | 2.78 ± 0.12 a | 3.34 ± 0.14 b | 12.99 ± 0.89 b | 96.96 ± 0.66 b | |
| Common bean | 0.20 ± 0.01 d | 2.56 ± 0.23 b | 2.49 ± 0.09 c | 12.95 ± 0.61 b | 98.05 ± 0.05 a | |
| Star-shaped | Red lentil | 0.60 ± 0.03 a | 1.14 ± 0.04 f | 4.05 ± 0.20 a | 7.68 ± 0.36 e | 96.82 ± 0.21 b |
| Faba bean | 0.27 ± 0.02 c | 1.56 ± 0.05 de | 2.60 ± 0.03 c | 13.08 ± 0.56 b | 93.25 ± 0.14 d | |
| Brown pea | 0.27 ± 0.01 c | 1.70 ± 0.17 d | 3.33 ± 0.02 b | 10.62 ± 0.20 cd | 92.75 ± 0.40 d | |
| Common bean | 0.25 ± 0.01 c | 1.42 ± 0.07 e | 2.81 ± 0.18 c | 11.77 ± 0.61 bc | 96.99 ± 0.01 b | |
| Legume | ||||||
| Die | ||||||
| Legume × die | ||||||
BD = bulk density; ER = expansion ratio; WAI = water absorption index; WSI = water solubility index; DG = degree of starch gelatinization. Different letters in column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between both shapes of products (sphere and star) considering the interaction between the two factors (legume and die).
Figure 3Size of the legume-based extrudates. From left to right: extrudates of red lentil (1), faba bean (2), brown pea (3) and common bean (4). The letters “a” and “b” indicate spherical and star-shaped extruded products, respectively.
Texture (mean ± standard deviation; n = 5) of dry and milk-soaked spherical and star-shaped extruded products obtained from different legume flours.
| Die Configuration | Legume | Dry | Milk-Soaked (Bowl Life) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | Crunchiness | Crispness | Hardness | Crunchiness | Crispness | ||
| Spherical | Red lentil | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| Faba bean | 606 ± 7 c | 1799 ± 84 c | 51.3 ± 2.1 cd | 395 ± 3 a | 610 ± 10 a | 14.3 ± 2.9 b | |
| Brown pea | 477 ± 13 d | 2354 ± 105 b | 71.0 ± 3.6 a | 384 ± 16 ab | 665 ± 75 a | 27.0 ± 1.7 a | |
| Common bean | 604 ± 39 c | 1469 ± 68 d | 53.3 ± 5.5 cd | 303 ± 1 d | 350 ± 3 c | 8.0 ± 1.0 c | |
| Star-shaped | Red lentil | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| Faba bean | 747 ± 21 b | 2582 ± 87 ab | 59.7 ± 2.5 bc | 355 ± 6 c | 513 ± 22 b | 15.0 ± 2.0 b | |
| Brown pea | 688 ± 13 b | 2629 ± 80 a | 65.7 ± 2.3 ab | 366 ± 9 bc | 497 ± 4 b | 19.0 ± 1.0 b | |
| Common bean | 1030 ± 41 a | 2372 ± 129 ab | 50.0 ± 1.0 d | 393 ± 8 a | 429 ± 20 bc | 9.3 ± 1.2 c | |
| Legume | |||||||
| Die | |||||||
| Legume × die | |||||||
n.d. = not detectable. Different letters in the columns indicate the significant differences (p < 0.05) between both shapes of products (sphere and star) considering the interaction between the two factors (legume and die).
Figure 4Overall appearance of the legume-based extrudates. From left to right: extrudates of red lentil (1), faba bean (2), brown pea (3) and common bean (4). The letters “a” and “b” indicate the spherical and star-shaped extruded products, respectively.
Color parameters (mean ± standard deviation; n = 5) of spherical and star-shaped extruded products obtained from different legume flours.
| Die Configuration | Legume | Color Parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spherical | Red lentil | 74.64 ± 0.07 b | 4.18 ± 0.03 c | 31.88 ± 0.02 b |
| Faba bean | 70.45 ± 0.21 f | 2.75 ± 0.06 e | 20.94 ± 0.07 f | |
| Brown pea | 70.46 ± 0.09 f | 2.55 ± 0.05 f | 19.54 ± 0.03 h | |
| Common bean | 72.64 ± 0.04 d | 4.91 ± 0.01 a | 24.54 ± 0.05 c | |
| Star-shaped | Red lentil | 74.87 ± 0.06 a | 4.52 ± 0.03 b | 33.24 ± 0.04 a |
| Faba bean | 72.24 ± 0.06 e | 2.22 ± 0.02 h | 20.70 ± 0.08 g | |
| Brown pea | 73.25 ± 0.09 c | 2.39 ± 0.02 g | 21.09 ± 0.07 e | |
| Common bean | 75.04 ± 0.02 a | 4.09 ± 0.01 d | 24.12 ± 0.02 d | |
| Legume | ||||
| Die | ||||
| Legume × die | ||||
Different letters in the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between both shapes of products (sphere and star) considering the interaction between the two factors (legume and die).
Anti-nutritional compounds (mean ± standard deviation; n = 3) of spherical and star-shaped extruded products obtained from different legume flours.
| Die Configuration | Legume | Phytates Content | Oligosaccharide Content (mg/g d.m.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verbascose | Stachyose | Raffinose | |||
| Spherical | Red lentil | 3.55 ± 0.05 d | 17.02 ± 0.27 b | 31.09 ± 0.15 d | 14.18 ± 0.14 b |
| Faba bean | 6.53 ± 0.21 b | 13.69 ± 0.06 c | 41.45 ± 0.64 a | 3.84 ± 0.02 f | |
| Brown pea | 4.47 ± 0.04 c | 28.48 ± 0.48 a | 22.04 ± 0.38 e | 11.43 ± 0.30 c | |
| Common bean | 6.89 ± 0.09 a | 12.51 ± 0.42 d | 34.76 ± 0.42 c | 5.54 ± 0.40 e | |
| Star-shaped | Red lentil | 3.55 ± 0.11 d | 14.50 ± 0.44 c | 30.58 ± 0.67 d | 17.43 ± 0.10 a |
| Faba bean | 6.66 ± 0.22 ab | 14.08 ± 0.62 c | 42.52 ± 0.07 a | 3.67 ± 0.32 f | |
| Brown pea | 4.17 ± 0.03 c | 28.70 ± 0.12 a | 22.45 ± 0.38 e | 11.08 ± 0.04 c | |
| Common bean | 6.98 ± 0.03 a | 11.41 ± 0.41 d | 37.31 ± 1.04 b | 6.93 ± 0.36 d | |
| Legume | |||||
| Die | |||||
| Legume × die | |||||
Different letters in the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between both shapes of products (sphere and star) considering the interaction between the two factors (legume and die).
Characterization of extruded products (spheres and stars) by sensory attribute liking.
| Die Configuration | Legume | Appearance | Texture | Taste | Aftertaste |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spherical | Red lentil | 127 bc* | 178 b | 167 a | 149 ab |
| Faba bean | 106 cd | 98 cd | 124 b | 121 bc | |
| Brown pea | 107 cd | 105 cd | 101 bc | 113 bc | |
| Common bean | 76 d | 75 d | 75 c | 103 c | |
| Star-shaped | Red lentil | 199 a | 215 a | 199 a | 183 a |
| Faba bean | 160 b | 119 c | 126 b | 121 bc | |
| Brown pea | 132 bc | 123 c | 116 b | 115 bc | |
| Common bean | 101 cd | 95 cd | 100 bc | 102 c |
* Sums of rank by 28 semi-trained panelists (the smaller the sum, the better the sensory attribute liking). Different letters in the columns indicate significant differences among the sums of rank for each product (different limit at 5% of 35.93, z = 1.96), at p < 0.05.