| Literature DB >> 34945518 |
Vali Rasooli Sharabiani1, Sajad Sabzi1, Razieh Pourdarbani1, Mariusz Szymanek2, Sławomir Michałek3.
Abstract
Fruits provide various vitamins to the human body. The chemical properties of fruits provide useful information to researchers, including determining the ripening time of fruits and the lack of nutrients in them. Conventional methods for determining the chemical properties of fruits are destructive and time-consuming methods that have no application for online operations. For that, various researchers have conducted various studies on non-destructive methods, which are currently in the research and development stage. Thus, the present paper focusses on a non-destructive method based on spectral data in the 200-1100-nm region for estimation of total soluble solids and BrimA in Gala apples. The work steps included: (1) collecting different samples of Gala apples at different stages of maturity; (2) extracting spectral data of samples and pre-preprocessing them; (3) measuring the chemical properties of TSS and BrimA; (4) selecting optimal (effective) wavelengths using artificial neural network-simulated annealing algorithm (ANN-SA); and (5) estimating chemical properties based on partial least squares regression (PLSR) and hybrid artificial neural network known as the imperialist competitive algorithm (ANN-ICA). It should be noted that, in order to investigate the validity of the methods, the estimation algorithm was repeated 500 times. In the end, the results displayed that, in the best training, the ANN-ICA predicted the TSS and BrimA with correlation coefficients of 0.963 and 0.965 and root mean squared error of 0.167% and 0.596%, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: apple; artificial neural network; non-destructive prediction; optimization algorithm; ripening; spectroscopy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34945518 PMCID: PMC8700664 DOI: 10.3390/foods10122967
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Schematic view of different steps of proposed algorithm in this research.
The structure of ANN-SA for selecting the most effective spectrum.
| Parameters | Specification |
|---|---|
| Number of neurons | 1st layer: 13 |
| 2nd layer: 23 | |
| Number of layers | 2 |
| Transfer function | 1st layer: radbas |
| 2nd layer: logsig | |
| Back propagation network training function | trains |
| Back propagation weight/bias learning function | learnh |
Structure of the hidden layers of ANN-ICA to predict TSS and BrimA.
| Parameters | Specification | |
|---|---|---|
| TSS | BrimA | |
| Number of neurons | 16, 20, 7 | 19, 23, 17 |
| Number of layers | 3 | 3 |
| Transfer function | satlins, hardlim, tribas | netinv, logsig, logsig |
| Back propagation network training function | traincgb | traingd |
| Back propagation weight/bias learning function | learnsom | learnh |
Figure 2The correlation plot between mean predicted and true value of TSS of Gala cultivar (test set) for methods of ANN-ICA and PLSR. The multiply operation is denoted by the symbol *.
Figure 3Box diagram of error criteria (1st row) and coefficients of correlation and determination (2nd row) related to (a) ANN-ICA and (b) PLSR in prediction of TSS.
Figure 4The correlation plot between mean predicted and true value of BrimA of Gala cultivar for classifiers of ANN-ICA and PLSR. The multiply operation is denoted by the symbol *.
Figure 5Box diagram of error criteria (1st row) and coefficients of correlation and determination (2nd row) related to ANN-ICA and PLSR in prediction of BrimA.
Comparison of various criteria evaluating the efficiency of ANN-ICA and PLSR for predicting TSS in 500 replications using spectral data of key wavelengths.
| Method | Criteria | MSE | RMSE | MAE | R | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid ANN-ICA | Mean and SD in 500 iterations | 0.058 ± 0.022 | 0.237 ± 0.0466 | 0.186 ± 0.039 | 0.903 ± 0.037 | 0.818 ± 0.067 |
| In the best training | 0.028 | 0.167 | 0.129 | 0.963 | 0.927 | |
| PLSR | Mean and SD in 500 iterations | 0.366 ± 0.085 | 0.601 ± 0.071 | 0.473 ± 0.048 | 0.891 ± 0.027 | 0.794 ± 0.049 |
| In the best training | 0.187 | 0.432 | 0.396 | 0.953 | 0.908 |
Figure 6Box diagrams representing difference between the true and the predicted values of TSS in 500 replications. (a) ANN-ICA method, (b) PLSR method.
Comparison of various criteria evaluating the efficiency of ANN-ICA and PLSR for predicting BrimA in 500 replications using spectral data of effective wavelengths.
| Method | Criteria | MSE | RMSE | MAE | R | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid ANN-ICA | Mean and SD in 500 iterations | 0.662 ± 0.139 | 0.809 ± 0.088 | 0.649 ± 0.081 | 0.943 ± 0.011 | 0.889 ± 0.019 |
| In the best training | 0.355 | 0.596 | 0.487 | 0.965 | 0.931 | |
| PLSR | Mean and SD in 500 iterations | 0.675 ± 0.128 | 0.818 ± 0.078 | 0.651 ± 0.064 | 0.866 ± 0.031 | 0.751 ± 0.053 |
| In the best training | 0.475 | 0.693 | 0.549 | 0.922 | 0.851 |
Figure 7Box diagrams of the difference between the true and the predicted values of the BrimA of Gala apples in 500 iterations. (a) ANN-ICA method, (b) PLSR method.