| Literature DB >> 34945501 |
Dah-Sol Kim1, Nami Joo1.
Abstract
One of the objectives of this study was to determine the effect of the cooking method on the antioxidant activity of Sacha inchi (Plukenetia volubilis). This work was focused on the importance of performing proper cooking for studying Sacha inchi. The result of this study sheds light on preventing nutritional loss with appropriate cooking methods. Three types of cooking processes were selected: uncooked, roasted at 160 °C for 6 min, boiled at 100 °C for 13 min. The results of the present study indicated that roasted Sacha inchi is distinguishable for its high content of antioxidants (total polyphenol content 485.50 μM, total flavonoid content 0.02 μg/mL, DPPH free radical scavenging activity 33.05%, ferric reducing ability 0.19 μM). The results of the present study also indicated that Sacha inchi uniquely promotes HT22 cell viability. With roasted Sacha inchi treatment, HT22 hippocampal neuronal cell showed a significantly increased number of growth (p < 0.001). Results also suggest that the development of tenderized Sacha inchi could help the elderly consumers achieve their target antioxidant provision in smaller portion sizes, thus curtailing the peril of sarcopenia. The mousse type of elderly food may also change the taste of many other nut consumers as they may opt to start selling and consuming Sacha inchi. It could be in the Sacha inchi industry's best interest to make certain all of the population's textural favors are catered.Entities:
Keywords: HT22 hippocampal brain neuron cell; Sacha inchi; antioxidant; cognitive ability; mousse type of elderly food
Year: 2021 PMID: 34945501 PMCID: PMC8700732 DOI: 10.3390/foods10122948
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Experimental design for response surface analysis and sensory properties of braised Sacha inchi.
| Standard | Run No. | Soy Sauce | Corn Starch Syrup | Roasted Sacha Inchi | Water | Response | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweetness (Y1) | Saltiness (Y2) | Nuttiness (Y3) | Overall Taste (Y4) | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 7.50 | 8.50 | 100.0 | 200.0 | 2.90 ± 0.14 | 2.79 ± 0.13 | 2.88 ± 0.14 | 2.98 ± 0.12 |
| 2 | 6 | 82.50 | 8.50 | 2.79 ± 0.13 | 2.68 ± 0.13 | 2.86 ± 0.14 | 2.97 ± 0.13 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 7.50 | 42.50 | 3.12 ± 0.14 | 3.34 ± 0.15 | 2.97 ± 0.13 | 2.95 ± 0.14 | ||
| 4 | 9 | 82.50 | 42.50 | 2.65 ± 0.13 | 2.97 ± 0.14 | 2.75 ± 0.13 | 2.76 ± 0.13 | ||
| 5 | 7 | 7.50 | 25.50 | 4.01 ± 0.20 | 4.32 ± 0.20 | 4.21 ± 0.21 | 3.91 ± 0.19 | ||
| 6 | 3 | 82.50 | 25.50 | 3.92 ± 0.18 | 4.11 ± 0.19 | 4.23 ± 0.20 | 3.72 ± 0.18 | ||
| 7 | 10 | 45.00 | 8.50 | 4.31 ± 0.21 | 4.21 ± 0.20 | 4.02 ± 0.19 | 4.13 ± 0.20 | ||
| 8 | 4 | 45.00 | 42.50 | 4.45 ± 0.22 | 4.30 ± 0.18 | 4.11 ± 0.20 | 4.20 ± 0.21 | ||
| 9 | 8 | 45.00 | 25.50 | 5.65 ± 0.27 | 5.50 ± 0.26 | 5.65 ± 0.28 | 5.79 ± 0.25 | ||
| 10 | 5 | 45.00 | 25.50 | 5.78 ± 0.26 | 5.55 ± 0.27 | 5.89 ± 0.29 | 6.08 ± 0.28 | ||
| F-value | 204.17 *** | 178.23 *** | 147.82 *** | 24.80 ** | |||||
Each value is an average of three replicates mean ± standard deviation. ** significant at p < 0.01, *** significant at p < 0.001.
Analyzed antioxidant effects of raw, roasted, and boiled Sacha inchi.
| Treatment | F-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | Roasting | Boiling | ||
| Total polyphenol | 737.519 ± 60.47 a | 485.500 ± 10.89 b | 159.683 ± 7.56 c | 1051.063 *** |
| Total flavonoid | 0.004 ± 0.000 c | 0.021 ± 0.001 a | 0.012 ± 0.001 b | 377.444 *** |
| DPPH free radical scavenging activity | 29.890 ± 1.09 b | 33.051 ± 2.08 a | 27.120 ± 0.88 c | 25.205 *** |
| Ferric reducing ability | 0.133 ± 0.002 b | 0.186 ± 0.008 a | 0.124 ± 0.003 b | 180.828 *** |
Each value is an average of three replicates mean ± standard deviation. *** significant at p < 0.001. a, b, c mean in a line by different superscripts are significantly different by Tukey’s multiple comparison method.
Figure 1Analyzed antioxidant effects of raw, roasted, and boiled Sacha inchi. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons using IBM SPSS statistics 23 (level of significance, *** p < 0.001).
Analyzed HT22 cell viability after 24 h according to extractant concentration for roasted Sacha inchi.
| Treatment | Percentage of Control |
|---|---|
| Control (DMEM) | 98.45 ± 0.60 a |
| Roasted Sacha inchi 40% ethanol extract | 89.53 ± 0.98 b |
| Roasted Sacha inchi 70% ethanol extract | 100.83 ± 1.98 a |
| F-value | 61.000 *** |
Each value is an average of three replicates mean ± standard deviation. *** significant at p < 0.001. a, b mean in a row by different superscripts are significantly different by Tukey’s multiple comparison method.
HT22 cell viability in the hippocampus for validation of cognitive enhancement by roasted Sacha inchi.
| Concentration (μg/mL) | Percentage of Control |
|---|---|
| Control (DMEM) | 100.00 ± 1.54 c |
| 1 | 105.61 ± 0.84 a |
| 5 | 106.65 ± 0.90 a |
| 10 | 105.87 ± 0.10 a |
| 20 | 105.43 ± 2.12 a |
| 40 | 103.69 ± 0.32 ab |
| 80 | 104.21 ± 0.83 ab |
| 100 | 101.59 ± 0.97 bc |
| F-value | 12.555 *** |
Each value is an average of three replicates mean ± standard deviation. *** significant at p < 0.001. a, b, c mean in a row by different superscripts are significantly different by Tukey’s multiple comparison method.
Figure 2Effects of roasted Sacha inchi on HT22 cell viability. Cells were incubated with roasted Sacha inchi (1~100 μg/mL) for 24 h on confluent cells, and the viability was quantified by an MTT assay. Results of cell viability are expressed as percentage of untreated control cells. Results of three independent experiments were averaged and are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons using IBM SPSS statistics 23 (level of significance, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Hardness of mousse type braised Sacha inchi added with gelatin powder.
| Concentration of Gelatin (%) | Hardness (N/m2) |
|---|---|
| 3 | 844.67 ± 16.79 |
| 5 | 2013.78 ± 26.93 |
| 7 | 3235.49 ± 50.26 |
| 9 | 3883.55 ± 166.10 |
| 11 | 4656.08 ± 191.72 |
| 13 | 5757.47 ± 37.34 |
| 15 | 12,042.94 ± 292.71 |
| 17 | 15,764.71 ± 859.91 |
| 19 | 25,829.05 ± 428.53 |
| 21 | 31,152.57 ± 291.13 |
| 23 | 36,586.56 ± 329.20 |
| 25 | 43,441.47 ± 2105.53 |
| 27 | 49,551.54 ± 1519.17 |
| 29 | 54,008.06 ± 955.80 |
| 31 | 61,211.00 ± 1205.74 |
| 33 | 65,614.42 ± 1064.42 |
| 35 | 71,214.89 ± 342.37 |
| 37 | 78,184.04 ± 842.00 |
| 39 | 81,314.33 ± 1461.28 |
| 41 | 90,759.82 ± 1810.79 |
Each value is an average of three replicates mean ± standard deviation.