| Literature DB >> 34945347 |
Muhammad Haroon Rashid1, Ants Koel2, Toomas Rang2, Nadeem Nasir3, Haris Mehmood4, Salman Cheema3.
Abstract
In the last decade, silicon carbide (SiC) has emerged as a potential material for high-frequency electronics and optoelectronics applications that may require elevated temperature processing. SiC exists in more than 200 different crystallographic forms, referred to as polytypes. Based on their remarkable physical and electrical characteristics, such as better thermal and electrical conductivities, 3C-SiC, 4H-SiC, and 6H-SiC are considered as the most distinguished polytypes of SiC. In this article, physical device simulation of a light-emitting diode (LED) based on the unique structural configuration of 4H-SiC and 6H-SiC layers has been performed which corresponds to a novel material joining technique, called diffusion welding/bonding. The proposed single quantum well (SQW) edge-emitting SiC-based LED has been simulated using a commercially available semiconductor device simulator, SILVACO TCAD. Moreover, by varying different design parameters, the current-voltage characteristics, luminous power, and power spectral density have been calculated. Our proposed LED device exhibited promising results in terms of luminous power efficiency and external quantum efficiency (EQE). The device numerically achieved a luminous efficiency of 25% and EQE of 16.43%, which is at par performance for a SQW LED. The resultant LED structure can be customized by choosing appropriate materials of varying bandgaps to extract the light emission spectrum in the desired wavelength range. It is anticipated that the physical fabrication of our proposed LED by direct bonding of SiC-SiC wafers will pave the way for the future development of efficient and cost-effective SiC-based LEDs.Entities:
Keywords: 4H-SiC; 6H-SiC; diffusion bonding; diffusion welding; edge-emitting led; light-emitting diode; quantum well; silicon carbide
Year: 2021 PMID: 34945347 PMCID: PMC8707511 DOI: 10.3390/mi12121499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Schematic of diffusion welding process (a) Bonding of two wafers under high pressure and temperature; (b) Direct bonding of wafers A and B under high pressure [25].
Figure 2Simulation steps of proposed SiC-based light-emitting diode (a) 300 µm thick wafer of N-type 4H-SiC; (b) deposition of an epitaxial layer of intrinsic 6H-SiC on 300 µm thick wafer of N-type 4H-SiC; (c) diffusion welding of 300 µm thick p-type 4H-SiC (Stack A) wafer with Stack B (n-type 4H-SiC and 6H-SiC).
Figure 3Schematic of 4H-SiC/6H-SiC/4H-SiC single quantum-well double hetero-structure edge-emitting LED.
Figure 4(a) Schematic of band profile of 4H-SiC/6H-SiC/4H-SiC LED where Eg1 is bandgap of 4H-SiC and Eg2 is bandgap of 6H-SiC; (b) emission of light from active layer region of edge-emitting LED.
Materials parameters used in SILVACO TCAD for simulated SiC LED [47].
| Symbol | Quantity | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Eg1 | Bandgap of 4H-SiC | 3.24 eV |
| Eg2 | Bandgap of 6H-SiC | 3.00 eV |
| Permittivity | 6H-SiC | 9.66 |
| Permittivity | 4H-SiC | 9.7 |
| Affinity | 6H-SiC | 3.00 eV |
| Affinity | 4H-SiC | 3.24 eV |
|
| Electron density of states for 6H-SiC | 7.68 × 1018 cm−3 |
|
| Electron density of states for 4H-SiC | 1.66 × 1019 cm−3 |
|
| Holes density of states for 6H-SiC | 4.76 × 10+18 |
|
| Holes density of states for 4H-SiC(per cc) | 3.30 × 10+19 |
| el | Life time of electrons for 6H-SiC | 1.00 × 10−7 |
| el | Life time of electrons for 4H-SiC | 1.00 × 10−7 |
| ho | Life time of holes for 4H-SiC | 1.00 × 10−7 |
| ho | Life time of holes for 6H-SiC | 1.00 × 10−7 |
| MUNO | Mobility of electrons for 6H-SiC | 330 cm2/(V·s) |
| MUNO | Mobility of electrons for 4H-SiC | 440 cm2/(V·s) |
| MUPO | Mobility of holes for 6H-SiC | 300 cm2/(V·s) |
| MUPO | Mobility of holes for 4H-SiC | 124 cm2/(V·s) |
Figure 5Energy band profile of SQW SiC LED as a function of its depth.
Figure 6Anode voltage vs. anode current density of simulated SiC LED.
Figure 7Anode current density vs. luminous power of simulated SiC LED.
Figure 8Wavelength vs. power spectral density of simulated SiC-based SQW LED. (Where curve-1 is at an anode voltage of 4 V and curve-2 is at an anode voltage of 6 V).
Luminous efficiency calculations for simulated SiC LED at 39 kA/cm2 bias.
| Device | Radiative Rate | Recombination Rate cm3/s (T) | %Luminuous Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| SQW SiC LED | 5 × 1014 | 2 × 1015 | 25 |
External quantum efficiency calculation for simulated LED at 6 V.
| Device | Flux Spectral Density [s cm eV]−1 (Φ) | Bias Current | %External Quantum Efficiency (%EQE = (q Φ/Js) × 100) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SQW SiC LED | 4 × 1019 | 39 | 16.43 |
Comparison of the luminous efficiencies of simulated. SiC LED with the literature [50].
| Device | Bias Current | %Luminous Efficiency |
|---|---|---|
| SQW SiC LED | 39 | 25 |
| Device A * | 5.62 | 79.8 |
| Device B * | 5.62 | 82.5 |
| Device C * | 5.62 | 81.0 |
* These LED structures have multiple quantum wells.
Comparison of the external quantum efficiencies of simulated. SiC LED with literature [50].
| Device | Bias Current | %External Quantum Efficiency |
|---|---|---|
| SQW SiC LED | 39 | 16.43 |
| Device A * | 5.62 | 19.3 |
| Device B * | 12.32 | 25.4 |
| Device C * | 12.02 | 24.0 |
* These LED structures have multiple quantum wells.